Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Diagnosis of discogenic low back pain in patients with probable symptoms but negative discography

  • Orthopaedic Outcome Assessment
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of the current study was to determine, whenever the patients complained of probable symptoms of discogenic low back pain and had obvious disc pathological changes on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) but showed negative in discography, whether we could absolutely exclude the diagnosis of discogenic pain or not.

Methods

The patients we selected in our study had only one segmental disc pathology on MRI for the purpose of minimizing the interference and all patients complained of probable discogenic pain symptoms. Some special lumbar diseases were excluded by physical examination and CT or MRI scan. Finally, 45 isolated patients with negative discography were enrolled in our study from January 2006 to June 2008. Twenty-three patients were randomly distributed in experimental group, who underwent provocative discography plus intradiscal injection of dexamethasone (5 mg in each patient), while the other 22 patients in the control group received intradiscal injection of saline as a placebo. Visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were used to evaluate the changes of pain and function after discography.

Results

The mean age of the 16 male and 29 female patients was 44.9 years, whose main clinical manifestations included axial back pain (100%), pain in the region of Groin (33.3%), pain in the anterior or posterior region of thigh (42.2%), buttock pain (24.4%) and lower extremity pain (11.1%), and among them L3–L4 pathological disc was found in three patient, L4–L5 pathological disc in 28 patients and L5–S1 pathological disc in 14 patients. Discography and CT scans of the 45 patients revealed that there were grade 5 in 38 discs and grade 4 in seven discs by means of Modified Dallas classification. After about 6-month follow-up, the results showed that VAS scores and ODI scores were greatly improved during the first 3-month follow-up in the experimental group compared with pre-discography and between groups (p < 0.05), but no statistically significant difference after 24-week follow-up (p > 0.05). The probable symptoms of discogenic low back pain were significantly improved in the experimental group in the short term.

Conclusion

The study indicated that negative discography in patients with probable symptoms of discogenic low back pain cannot absolutely exclude the diagnosis of discogenic pain. Patients of this kind may suffer from other diseases, but we cannot ignore the existence of discogenic pain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Trainor TJ, Wiesel SW (2002) Epidemiology of back pain in the athlete. Clin Sports Med 21(1):93–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Peng B, Wu W, Hou S, Li P, Zhang C, Yang Y (2005) The pathogenesis of discogenic low back pain. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87(1):62–67

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Solovieva S, Kouhia S, Leino-Arjas P, Ala-Kokko L, Luoma K, Raininko R, Saarela J, Riihimaki H (2004) Interleukin 1 polymorphisms and intervertebral disc degeneration. Epidemiology 15(5):626–633 (00001648-200409000-00021[pii])

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Young S, Aprill C, Laslett M (2003) Correlation of clinical examination characteristics with three sources of chronic low back pain. Spine J 3(6):460–465 (S1529943003001517[pii])

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cohen SP, Larkin TM, Barna SA, Palmer WE, Hecht AC, Stojanovic MP (2005) Lumbar discography: a comprehensive review of outcome studies, diagnostic accuracy, and principles. Reg Anesth Pain Med 30(2):163–183 (S1098733904005930[pii])

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mekhail NA, Moufawad S (2000) Discography and discogenic pain. Tech Reg Anaesth Pain 4(3):126–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sachs BL, Vanharanta H, Spivey MA, Guyer RD, Videman T, Rashbaum RF, Johnson RG, Hochschuler SH, Mooney V (1987) Dallas discogram description: a new classification of CT/discography in low-back disorders. Spine 12(3):287–294

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Derby R, Howard MW, Grant JM, Lettice JJ, Van Peteghem PK, Ryan DP (1999) The ability of pressure-controlled discography to predict surgical and nonsurgical outcomes. Spine 24(4):364–371 (discussion 371–362)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Murtagh FR, Arrington JA (1992) Computer tomographically guided discography as a determinant of normal disc level before fusion. Spine 17(7):826–830

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Carragee EJ, Alamin TF (2001) Discography. a review. Spine J 1(5):364–372 (S1529-9430(01)00051-1[pii])

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Moneta GB, Videman T, Kaivanto K, Aprill C, Spivey M, Vanharanta H, Sachs BL, Guyer RD, Hochschuler SH, Raschbaum RF et al (1994) Reported pain during lumbar discography as a function of anular ruptures and disc degeneration A re-analysis of 833 discograms. Spine 19(17):1968–1974

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Scuderi GJ, Brusovanik GV, Golish SR, Demeo R, Hyde J, Hallab N, Vaccaro AR (2008) A critical evaluation of discography in patients with lumbar intervertebral disc disease. Spine J 8(4):624–629. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2006.10.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Freemont AJ, Watkins A, Le Maitre C, Baird P, Jeziorska M, Knight MT, Ross ER, O’Brien JP, Hoyland JA (2002) Nerve growth factor expression and innervation of the painful intervertebral disc. J Pathol 197(3):286–292. doi:10.1002/path.1108

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Weisskopf M, Birnbaum K, Sagheri M, Lorenzen J, Wirtz DC (2004) Correlation of low back pain and enhanced vascularization in the vertebral endplate. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 142(2):174–178. doi:10.1055/s-2004-818782

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Burke JG, Watson RWG, Conhyea D, McCormack D, Dowling FE, Walsh MG, Fitzpatrick JM (2003) Human nucleus pulposis can respond to a pro-inflammatory stimulus. Spine 28(24):2685–2693. doi:10.1097/01.BRS.0000103341.45133.F3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Olmarker K, Nutu M, Storkson R (2003) Changes in spontaneous behavior in rats exposed to experimental disc herniation are blocked by selective TNF-alpha inhibition. Spine 28(15):1635–1641. doi:10.1097/01.BRS.0000083162.35476.FF (discussion 1642)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Shen B, Melrose J, Ghosh P, Taylor F (2003) Induction of matrix metalloproteinase-2 and -3 activity in ovine nucleus pulposus cells grown in three-dimensional agarose gel culture by interleukin-1beta: a potential pathway of disc degeneration. Eur Spine J 12(1):66–75. doi:10.1007/s00586-002-0454-2

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Adams MA, McNally DS, Dolan P (1996) ‘Stress’ distributions inside intervertebral discs The effects of age and degeneration. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78(6):965–972

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Peng B, Wu W, Li Z, Guo J, Wang X (2007) Chemical radiculitis. Pain 127(1–2):11–16. doi:10.1016/j.pain.2006.06.034

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Buttermann GR (2004) The effect of spinal steroid injections for degenerative disc disease. Spine J 4(5):495–505. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2004.03.024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. McLain RF, Kapural L, Mekhail NA (2005) Epidural steroid therapy for back and leg pain: mechanisms of action and efficacy. Spine J 5(2):191–201. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2004.10.046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopedics, The Second Military Medical University, Changzheng Hospital, 415 Fengyang Road, Huangpu District, Shanghai, 200003, P. R. China

    Yang Yu, Wei Liu, Dianwen Song, Qunfeng Guo & Lianshun Jia

  2. Department of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Liaoning Medical University, Jinzhou, P. R. China

    Yang Yu

Authors
  1. Yang Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wei Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dianwen Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Qunfeng Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Lianshun Jia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dianwen Song.

Additional information

The authors Y. Yu, W. Liu contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yu, Y., Liu, W., Song, D. et al. Diagnosis of discogenic low back pain in patients with probable symptoms but negative discography. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132, 627–632 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-011-1448-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-011-1448-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation