Clinical and radiographical results of 179 thrust plate hip prostheses: 5–14 years follow-up study

Abstract

Introduction

The thrust plate hip prosthesis (TPP) is a bone-reserving prosthesis for cementless fixation at the metaphysis of the proximal femur. We retrospectively evaluated the results of 162 patients (179 hips) who underwent hip arthroplasty using TPP.

Patients and methods

Eighty-three patients (87 hips) suffered from osteoarthritis of the hip joint (OA group), 79 patients (92 hips) from osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ON group). The mean age at surgery was 55 years in the OA group and 47.4 years in the ON group. The mean follow-up period was 97 months in the OA group and 104 months in the ON group. For these patients, we evaluated the results clinically and radiographically.

Results

The mean Merle d’Aubigne’s score improved from 8.2 to 16.9 in the OA group and from 9.1 to 16.6 in the ON group at the final follow-up. Early mechanical loosening of TPP was observed in two hips of OA and one hip of ON. In one patient of ON, bilateral TPPs had to be removed 5 years postoperatively because of infection. Two female patients with ON suffered from a spontaneous femoral fracture below the tip of the lateral plate. Kaplan–Meier survivorship using TPP removed for any reason as the end point was 97.7% in the OA group and 90.3% in the ON group after 13 years.

Conclusion

The middle-term results of the TPP were satisfactory if the indication for the TPP and the operative procedure were appropriate. The TPP is a useful and safe prosthesis for relatively young patients with not only osteoarthritis of the hip but also osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. 1.

    Adili A, Trousdale RT (2003) Femoral head resurfacing for the treatment of osteonecrosis in the young patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 417:93–101

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Amstutz HC, Antoniades JT, Le Duff MJ (2007) Results of metal-on-metal hybrid hip resurfacing for Crowe type-I and II developmental dysplasia. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 89:339–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Bereiter H, Burgi M, Schenk R (1997) Finite element investigations of the proximal femur after implantation of the thrust plate prosthesis compared with findings in a post-mortem histological specimen and in radiological follow-up examinations. In: Huggler AH, Jacob HAC (eds) The thrust plate hip prosthesis. Springer, Berlin, pp 48–62

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Buergi ML, Stoffel KK, Jacob HAC, Bereiter HH (2005) Radiological findings and clinical results of 102 thrust plate femoral hip prostheses. J Arthroplasty 20:108–117

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Chen HH, Morrey BF, An KN, Luo ZP (2009) Bone remodeling characteristics of a short-stemmed total hip replacement. J Arthroplasty 24:945–950

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Corner JA, Rawoot A, Parmar HV (2008) The thrust plate prosthesis in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the hip. Clinical and radiological outcome with minimum 5-year follo-up. Hip Int 18:88–94

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Davies AP, Willert HG, Campbell PA, Learmonth ID, Case CP (2005) An unusual lymphocytic perivascular infiltration in tissues around contemporary metal-on-metal joint replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 87:18–27

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Engh CA, Bobyn JD, Glassman AH (1987) Porous-coated hip replacement: the factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results. J Bone Joint Surg Br 69:45–55

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Fink B, Wessel S, Deuretzbacher G, Protzen M, Ruther W (2007) Midterm results of thrust plate prosthesis. J Arthroplasty 22:703–710

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Fottner A, Schmid M, Birkenmaier C, Mazoochian F, Plitz W, Jansson V (2009) Biomechanical evaluation of two types of short-stemmed hip prostheses compared to the thrust plate prosthesis by three-dimensional measurement of micromotions. Clin Biomech 24:429–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Goh SK, Yang KY, Koh JS, Wong MK, Chua SY, Chua DT, Howe TS (2007) Subtrochanteric insufficiency fractures in patients on alendronate therapy: a caution. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 89:349–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Goto T, Yasunaga Y, Takahashi K, Ochi M (2004) Biomechanical analysis and quantitative analysis of bone scintigraphy on thrust plate hip prosthesis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124:357–362

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Gruber G, Wricke J, Sturz H (1997) Recommendations for standardized radiologic follow-up of thrust plate endoprosthesis. Aktuelle Radiol 7:312–316

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Huggler AH (1997) The thrust plate prosthesis. A new experience in hip surgery. In: Huggler AH, Jacob HAC (eds) The thrust plate hip prosthesis. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Ishaque BA, Gils J, Wienbeck S, Donle E, Basad E, Sturz H (2009) Results after replacement of femoral neck prostheses–thrust plate prosthesis (TPP) versus ESKA cut prosthesis. Z Orthop Unfall 147:79–88

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Jakubowitz E, Seeger JB, Lee C, Heisel C, Kretzer JP, Thomsen MN (2009) Do short-stemmed-prostheses induce priprosthetic fractures earlier than standard hip stem? A biomechanical ex vivo study of two different stem designs. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129:849–855

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Jacob HAC (1997) Biomechanical principles and design details of the thrust plate hip prosthesis. In: Huggler AH, Jacob HAC (eds) the thrust plate hip prosthesis. Springer, Berlin, pp 25–47

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Karatoson V, Unver B, Gunal I (2008) Hip arthroplasty with the thrust plate prosthesis in patients of 65 years of age or older: 67 patients followed 2–7 years. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128:377–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Livermore J, Ilstrup D, Morrey B (1990) Effect of femoral head size on wear of the polyethylene acetabular component. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 72:518–528

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Maniar RN, Todd RC, Robinson S (1995) Uptake of 99mTc-MDP after uncemented hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 79:123–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Merle d’Aubigne R, Postel M (1954) Functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthrsis. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 36:451–475

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Moonot P, Singh PJ, Cronin MD, Kalairajah YE, Kavanagh TG, Field RE (2008) Birmingham hip resurfacing: is acetabular bone conserved? J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 90:319–323

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Morrey BF, Adams RA, Kessler M (2000) A consecutive femoral replacement for total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 82:952–958

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Naal FD, Schmled M, Munzinger U, Leunig M, Hersche O (2009) Outcome of hip resurfacing arthroplasty in patients with developmental hip dysplasia. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:1516–1521

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Niggemeyer O, Steihagen J, Ruther W (2010) Long-term results of the thrust plate prosthesis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a minimum 10-years follow-up. J Orthop Sci 15:772–780

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Pandit H, Glyn-Jones S, McLardy-Smith P, Gundle R, Whitwell D, Gibbons CL, Ostlere S, Athanasou N, Gill HS, Murray DW (2008) Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip replacements. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 90:847–851

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Sayed-Noor AS, Sjoden GO (2009) Two femoral insufficiency fractures after long-term alendronate therapy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:1921–1926

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Shimmin AJ, Back D (2005) Femoral neck fractures following Birmingham hip resurfacing: a national review of 50 cases. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 87:463–464

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Steens W, Daele R, U. Simon, Goetze C (2009) Clinical and radiological mid-term results of the thrust plate prosthesis. Int Orthop 33:1519–1524

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Suh KT, Lee CB, Kim IJ (2001) Natural progress of a bone scan after cementless hydroxyapatite-coated total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 389:134–142

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Sugano N, Atsumi T, Ohzono K, Kubo T, Hotokebuchi T, Takaoka K (2002) The 2001 revised criteria for diagnosis, classification, and staging of idiopathic osteonecorosis of the femoral head. J Orthop Sci 7:601–605

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Witzleb WC, Arnold M, Krummenauer F, Knecht A, Ranisch H, Gunther KP (2008) Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: short term clinical and radiographic outcome. Eur J Med Res 13:39–46

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Yasunaga Y, Goto T, Hisatome T, Tanaka R, Yamasaki T, Ochi M (2003) Bone-preserving prosthesis with a single axis for treating osteonecrosis of the femoral head: midterm results for the thrust plate hip prosthesis. J Orthop Sci 8:818–822

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Zelle BA, Gerich TG, Bastian L, Shuler FD, Pape HC, Krettek C (2004) Total hip arthroplasty in young patients using the thrust plate prosthesis:clinical and radiological results. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124:310–316

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

No financial or any otherwise support has been received in any regard from any organization or institution for this study

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuji Yasunaga.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yasunaga, Y., Yamasaki, T., Matsuo, T. et al. Clinical and radiographical results of 179 thrust plate hip prostheses: 5–14 years follow-up study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132, 547–554 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-011-1434-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • A bone preserving prosthesis
  • Thrust plate prosthesis
  • THA