Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Publication rate of abstracts presented at the Annual Congress of the German Society of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery

  • Basic Science
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The quality of abstracts presented at medical conferences reflects the scientific activity in the organisations involved. The aims of this study were to evaluate the publication rate of studies presented at the annual congress of the German Society of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery and to investigate predictive factors for publication. The results were to be compared with other international meetings.

Method

All 1,100 abstracts presented at the Congress of the German Society of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery in 2003 were assessed. The publication rate for the corresponding articles in peer-reviewed journals within 5 years was examined using a PubMed search. The consistency of the congress abstracts with the publications was studied. Factors influencing publication rates were investigated, including level of evidence (LoE) and type of study.

Results

The publication rate was 36%, with a mean of 15 months between conference and publication (mean impact factor 1.50). No significant differences were observed between publication rates for oral presentations and posters. Experimental studies and those with LoE I and II had higher publication rates (47.1%; 55.2%; 39.8%) than clinical studies and those with LoE III and IV (30.8%; 29.2%; 28.0%). Abstracts of randomised studies and prospective studies showed publication rates of 43.2 and 35.6% and were published more often than abstracts of non-randomised studies and retrospective studies, with publication rates of 35.3 and 27.1%.

Conclusion

The publication rate was in the lower range of rates available for comparable conferences—e.g., the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, with rates between 34 and 55%—but lower than those of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association, at 52–67%. However, 64% of the abstracts remained unpublished, calling into question the acceptability of citing conference abstracts in the scientific literature and implementing them in clinical practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wirth CJ (2003) Abstracts of the German Orthopedic Congress. 13–16 November 2003, Berlin, Germany. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 141(Suppl 1):S1–S176

  2. Anonymous (1979) Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. Preface. Lancet 1(8113):428–430

    Google Scholar 

  3. Begg CB, Berlin JA (1989) Publication bias and dissemination of clinical research. J Natl Cancer Inst 81(2):107–115

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ, Guyatt GH, Cook DJ, Swiontkowski MF, Sprague S, Schemitsch EH (2002) An observational study of orthopaedic abstracts and subsequent full-text publications. J Bone Jt Surg Am 84-A(4):615–621

    Google Scholar 

  5. Craig NJA, Lothian L, Maffulli N (2001) Publication rates for presentations at British Orthopaedic Association meetings from 1980 to 1984 and 1990 to 1994. CME Orthop 2(2):40–43

    Google Scholar 

  6. Daluiski A, Kuhns CA, Jackson KR, Lieberman JR (1998) Publication rate of abstracts presented at the annual meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society. J Orthop Res 16(6):645–649. doi:10.1002/jor.1100160603

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. DeMola PM, Hill DL, Rogers K, Abboud JA (2009) Publication rate of abstracts presented at the shoulder and elbow session of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467(6):1629–1633. doi:10.1007/s11999-008-0474-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dickersin K (1990) The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence. JAMA 263(10):1385–1389

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Donegan DJ, Kim TW, Lee GC (2009) Publication rates of presentations at an Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Clin Orthop Relat Res. doi:10.1007/s11999-009-1171-5

  10. Easterbrook PJ, Berlin JA, Gopalan R, Matthews DR (1991) Publication bias in clinical research. Lancet 337(8746):867–872. doi:0140-6736(91)90201-Y

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Eck JC (2005) Publication rates of abstracts presented at biennial meetings of the International Society of Arthroscopy, Knee Surgery and Orthopaedic Sports Medicine. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 13(5):426–429. doi:10.1007/s00167-004-0559-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Editors ICoMJ (1997) Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. JAMA 277 (11):927–934

    Google Scholar 

  13. Editors ICoMJ (2008) Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: writing and editing for biomedical publication (updated October 2008). Available from http://icmjeorg/2008_urmpdf

  14. Gavazza JB, Foulkes GD, Meals RA (1996) Publication pattern of papers presented at the American Society for Surgery of the Hand annual meeting. J Hand Surg Am 21(5):742–745

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ghaemi SN (2009) The failure to know what isn’t known: negative publication bias with lamotrigine and a glimpse inside peer review. Evid Based Ment Health 12(3):65–68. doi:10.1136/ebmh.12.3.65

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Goldman L, Loscalzo A (1980) Fate of cardiology research originally published in abstract form. N Engl J Med 303(5):255–259

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Guryel E, Durrant AW, Alakeson R, Ricketts DM (2006) From presentation to publication: the natural history of orthopaedic abstracts in the United Kingdom. Postgrad Med J 82(963):70–72. doi:10.1136/pgmj.2005.033738

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hamlet WP, Fletcher A, Meals RA (1997) Publication patterns of papers presented at the annual meeting of The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. J Bone Jt Surg Am 79(8):1138–1143

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Harris IA, Mourad M, Kadir A, Solomon MJ, Young JM (2007) Publication bias in abstracts presented to the annual meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 15(1):62–66

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Harris IA, Mourad MS, Kadir A, Solomon MJ, Young JM (2006) Publication bias in papers presented to the Australian Orthopaedic Association Annual Scientific Meeting. ANZ J Surg 76(6):427–431. doi:10.1111/j.1445-2197.2006.03747.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jackson KR, Daluiski A, Kay RM (2000) Publication of abstracts submitted to the annual meeting of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America. J Pediatr Orthop 20(1):2–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Jasko JJ, Wood JH, Schwartz HS (2003) Publication rates of abstracts presented at Annual Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Meetings. Clin Orthop Relat Res (415):98–103. doi:10.1097/01.blo.0000093902.12372.76

  23. Kleweno CP, Bryant WK, Jacir AM, Levine WN, Ahmad CS (2008) Discrepancies and rates of publication in orthopaedic sports medicine abstracts. Am J Sports Med 36(10):1875–1879. doi:10.1177/0363546508319054

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kwong Y, Kwong FN, Patel J (2007) Publication rate of trauma abstracts presented at an international orthopaedic conference. Injury 38(7):745–749. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2006.07.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lloyd EW, Geller JA, Iorio R, Yoon RS, Huo M, Macaulay W (2006) Publication rates of scientific presentations at the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons annual meetings from 1996 to 2001. J Arthroplasty 21(6 Suppl 2):2–5. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2006.04.021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Murrey DB, Wright RW, Seiler JG, Day TE, Schwartz HS (1999) Publication rates of abstracts presented at the 1993 annual Academy meeting. Clin Orthop Relat Res (359):247–253

  27. Nguyen V, Tornetta P, Bkaric M (1998) Publication rates for the scientific sessions of the OTA. Orthopaedic Trauma Association. J Orthop Trauma 12(7):457–459 (discussion 456)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Obremskey WT, Pappas N, Attallah-Wasif E, Tornetta P, Bhandari M (2005) Level of evidence in orthopaedic journals. J Bone Jt Surg Am 87(12):2632–2638. doi:10.2106/JBJS.E.00370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Okike K, Kocher MS, Mehlman CT, Heckman JD, Bhandari M (2008) Publication bias in orthopaedic research: an analysis of scientific factors associated with publication in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume). J Bone Jt Surg Am 90(3):595–601. doi:10.2106/JBJS.G.00279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Preston CF, Bhandari M, Fulkerson E, Ginat D, Egol KA, Koval KJ (2006) The consistency between scientific papers presented at the Orthopaedic Trauma Association and their subsequent full-text publication. J Orthop Trauma 20(2):129–133. doi:10.1097/01.bot.0000199120.45982.41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Preston CF, Bhandari M, Fulkerson E, Ginat D, Koval KJ, Egol KA (2005) Podium versus poster publication rates at the Orthopaedic Trauma Association. Clin Orthop Relat Res (437):260–264. pii:00003086-200508000-0004

  32. Scherer RW, Langenberg P, von Elm E (2008) Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts (review). The Cochrane Library (4)

  33. Sprague S, Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ, Swiontkowski MF, Tornetta P, Cook DJ, Dirschl D, Schemitsch EH, Guyatt GH (2003) Barriers to full-text publication following presentation of abstracts at annual orthopaedic meetings. J Bone Jt Surg Am 85-A(1):158–163

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wang JC, Yoo S, Delamarter RB (1999) The publication rates of presentations at major Spine Specialty Society meetings (NASS, SRS, ISSLS). Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24(5):425–427

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Weale AR, Edwards AG, Lear PA, Morgan JD (2006) From meeting presentation to peer-review publication—a UK review. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 88(1):52–56

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Weber EJ, Callaham ML, Wears RL, Barton C, Young G (1998) Unpublished research from a medical specialty meeting: why investigators fail to publish. JAMA 280(3):257–259

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Whitehouse MR, Atwal NS, Blom AW (2009) Publication rates for hip surgery-related abstracts presented at national and international meetings. Orthopedics 32(6):407. doi:10.3928/01477447-20090511-13

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Wright JG (2007) A practical guide to assigning levels of evidence. J Bone Jt Surg Am 89(5):1128–1130. doi:10.2106/JBJS.F.01380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Wright JG, Swiontkowski M, Heckman JD (2006) Levels of evidence. J Bone Jt Surg Br 88(9):1264. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.88B9.18389

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Wright JG, Swiontkowski MF, Heckman JD (2003) Introducing levels of evidence to the journal. J Bone Jt Surg Am 85-A(1):1–3

    Google Scholar 

  41. Yoo S, Oh G, Wang JC (2002) Publication rates of presentations made at annual meetings of the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine and the Arthroscopy Association of North America. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 31(6):367–369 (discussion 369)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no financial competing interests. The authors T.L.S., T.L., G.G., S.H. and V.B. are members of the German Society of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedics and Tumour Orthopaedics, Münster University Hospital, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Germany

    Tobias L. Schulte, Matthias Trost, Katharina Huck, Tobias Lange, Georg Gosheger, Steffen Höll & Viola Bullmann

  2. Department of Medical Informatics and Biomathematics, University of Münster, Münster, Germany

    Nani Osada

Authors
  1. Tobias L. Schulte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Matthias Trost
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nani Osada
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Katharina Huck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Tobias Lange
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Georg Gosheger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Steffen Höll
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Viola Bullmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tobias L. Schulte.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schulte, T.L., Trost, M., Osada, N. et al. Publication rate of abstracts presented at the Annual Congress of the German Society of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132, 271–280 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-011-1398-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-011-1398-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation