Abstract
Background
Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) is biomechanically sound as it ablates the degenerated disc, restores the intervertebral height, relieves foraminal stenosis, and positions the bone graft along the weight-bearing axis. But this conventional procedure also results in significant traction on the dural sac and the cauda equina and is thereby a potential source of neurologic damage. Therefore, we performed a minimally invasive technique: percutaneous endoscopic discectomy and interbody fusion (PEDIF) with B-Twin expandable spinal spacer (B-twin ESS) to treat symptomatic lumbar degenerative disc disease and explored the clinical outcome.
Methods
From June 2004 to December 2006, 43 consecutive patients with symptomatic lumbar degenerative disc disease were included in this study. There were 28 males and 15 females, with average age of 47 years (range 26–63). Following a routine micro-endoscopic discectomy or percutaneous nucleotomy, endplate curettage was meticulously carried out. The intervertebral space was packed with autograft cancellous bone cut from lumbar delivered through a 5-mm diameter funnel. The B-twin ESS was introduced into the intervertebral space and then expanded. Both stages were monitored by C-arm fluoroscopy.
Results
The mean operative time was 110 ± 36 min (80–150). The mean blood loss was 350 ± 68 ml (210–700). The mean length of hospitalization was 6.6 ± 2.9 days (3–10). All patients were evaluated in follow-up of 12–30 months (mean 18). According to radiological evidence of fusion on dynamic X-ray plain film, 31 cases (72.1%) achieved bone graft fusion after 6 months postoperatively; at the final follow-up, union of the bone graft has been established in all but one patient (97.7%). The subsidence degree of the B-twin ESS was 20–30% in 2 cases and in rest of the cases less than 10%. According to the modified criteria of Chinese Orthopaedic Association, excellent in 31 cases, good in 8 cases, fair in 3 cases, poor in 1 case, and the rate of excellent and good cases was 91%.
Conclusion
The PEDIF technique provided an option for percutaneous interbody fusion similar to that in open surgery while minimizing destruction to adjacent tissues. This technique was safe and exhibited a trend toward decreased intraoperative blood loss, length of stay and the risk of neurological complications.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Evans JH (1985) Biomechanics of lumbar fusion. Clin Orthop 193:38–46
Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Tsuji H (1996) Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery. A histologic and enzymatic analysis. Spine 21:941–944
Bravda BM, Cinnella P (2000) Posterior endoscopic discectomy (and other procedure). Eur Spine J 9:24–29
Foley KT, Smith MM (1997) Microendoscopic discectomy. Tech Neurosurg 3:301–307
Bergey DL, Villavicencio AT, Goldstein T, Regan JJ (2004) Endoscopic lateral transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine. Spine 29:1681–1688
Jinkins JR (1999) The related consequences of acquired collapse of the intervertebral discs at and suprajacent to the lumbosacral junction. Riv Neuroradiol 12:15–26
Elias WJ, Simmons NE, Kaptain GJ, Chadduck JB, Whitehill R (2000) Complications of posterior lumbar interbody fusion when using a titanium-threaded cage device. J Neurosurg 93:45–52
Isaacs RE, Podichetty VK, Santiago P et al (2005) Minimally invasive microendoscopy-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with instrumentation. J Neurosurg 3:98–105
Schwender JD, Holly LT, Rouben DP et al (2005) Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): technical feasibility and initial results. J Spinal Disord Tech 18:S1–S613
Foley KT, Holly LT, Schwender JD (2003) Minimally invasive lumbar fusion. Spine 28:S26–S35
Jang JS, Lee SH (2005) Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with ipsilateral pedicle screw and contralateral facet screw fixation. J Neurosurg 3:218–223
Krismer M, Haid C, Rabl W (1996) The contribution of annulus fibers to torque resistance. Spine 21:2551–2557
Albumi K, Panjabi MM, Kramer K et al (1990) Biomechanical evaluation of lumbar spine stability after graded facetectomies. Spine 15:1142–1147
Fogel GR, Toohey JS, Neidre A (2006) Outcomes of L1–L2 posterior lumbar interbody fusion with the lumbar I/F cage and the variable screw placement system: reporting unexpected poor fusion results at L1–L2. Spine J 6:421–427
Regan JJ, Yuan H, McAfee PC (1999) Laparoscopic fusion of the lumbar spine: minimally invasive spine surgery. A prospective multicenter study evaluating open and laparoscopic lumbar fusion. Spine 24:402–411
Parikh K, Tomasino A, Knopman J, Boockvar J, Härtl R (2008) Operative results and learning curve: microscope-assisted tubular microsurgery for 1- and 2-level discectomies and laminectomies. Neurosurg Focus 25:E14
Yoram F, Sang HL, Jose RS, Reuven G (2003) Posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative disc disease using a minimally invasive B-Twin expandable spinal spacer. J Spinal Disord Tech 16:455–460
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yao, N., Wang, W. & Liu, Y. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and interbody fusion with B-Twin expandable spinal spacer. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131, 791–796 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-010-1222-0
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-010-1222-0