Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Non-operative treatment of ACL rupture with mild instability

  • Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study examined whether or not conservative treatment of an acutely injured anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) could be successful in a select group of patients. Routine ACL reconstruction surgery in all acute ACL-injured patients should be avoided. We hypothesize that acutely injured ACL with mild instability at the initial physical examination could be improved even if there is disruption of ACL fibers on magnetic resonance images (MRI).

Materials and methods

Among 232 acute ACL-injured patients who visited our institution from March 1997 to April 2006, 48 were treated non-operatively. Patients diagnosed with an acute ACL injury by MRI with Lachman test ≤grade 1 were treated non-operatively. In this study, 30 male and 18 female patients with a mean age of 31.8 years were enrolled. The initial and follow-up Lachman test and pivot shift test were performed 3 weeks after the injury. The Lysholm knee scoring scale, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score and KT-2000 were obtained at the last follow-up.

Results

There were 12 complete (25%) and 36 incomplete ACL ruptures (75%). The patients were followed up clinically and with MRI for 21.5 and 11.3 months, respectively. The follow-up Lachman test improved to grade 0 in 41 patients (87%). Thirty-six patients (76%) showed no laxity in the follow-up pivot shift test. The last follow-up IKDC score was a mean value of 91.1 points. KT 2000 was performed in 40 patients with a mean side-to-side difference of 2.85 mm. Of 48 patients, 46 showed restored ACL continuity and 39 (84%) showed restored low signal intensity on MRI.

Conclusion

A selective group of ACL tears with mild instability (Lachman ≤grade 1), though these seem to be complete tears on MRI, can show restoration of their continuity and signals on the MRI. Joint laxity on physical examination was improved at follow-up. These results suggest that a select group of patients with an acute ACL injury can successfully undergo non-operative treatment. In addition, unnecessary early ACL reconstruction surgery should be avoided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barrack RL, Bruckner JD, Kneisl J, Inman WS, Alexander AH (1990) The outcome of nonoperatively treated complete tears of the anterior cruciate ligament in active young adults. Clin Orthop Relat Res 259:192–199

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Barry KP, Mesgarzadeh M, Triolo J, Moyer R, Tehranzadeh J, Bonakdarpour A (1996) Accuracy of MRI patterns in evaluating anterior cruciate ligament tears. Skeletal Radiol 25:365–370

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Buss DD, Min R, Skyhar M, Galinat B, Warren RF, Wickiewicz TL (1995) Nonoperative treatment of acute anterior cruciate ligament injuries in a selected group of patients. Am J Sports Med 23:160–165

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Diekstall P, Rauhut F (1999) Considerations for the indications for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Results of conservative versus operative treatment. Unfallchirurg 102:173–181

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Eriksson E (2007) Partial ACL injuries. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:1065

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Falchook FS, Tigges S, Carpenter WA, Branch TP, Stiles RG (1996) Accuracy of direct signs of tears of the anterior cruciate ligament. Can Assoc Radiol J 47:114–120

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Frobell RB, Lohmander LS, Roos EM (2007) The challenge of recruiting patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury of the knee into a randomized clinical trial comparing surgical and non-surgical treatment. Contemp Clin Trials 28:295–302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fujimoto E, Sumen Y, Ochi M, Ikuta Y (2002) Spontaneous healing of acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries—conservative treatment using an extension block soft brace without anterior stabilization. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 122:212–216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jonsson H, Riklund-Ahlstrom K, Lind J (2004) Positive pivot shift after ACL reconstruction predicts later osteoarthrosis: 63 patients followed 5–9 years after surgery. Acta Orthop Scand 75:594–599

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kocher MS, Steadman JR, Briggs KK, Sterett WI, Hawkins RJ (2004) Relationships between objective assessment of ligament stability and subjective assessment of symptoms and function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 32:629–634

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee JK, Yao L, Phelps CT, Wirth CR, Czajka J, Lozman J (1988) Anterior cruciate ligament tears: MR imaging compared with arthroscopy and clinical tests. Radiology 166:861–864

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Myklebust G, Engebretsen L, Braekken IH, Skjolberg A, Olsen OE, Bahr R (2007) Prevention of noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injuries in elite and adolescent female team handball athletes. Instr Course Lect 56:407–418

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Petersen W, Zantop T (2006) Partial rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament. Arthroscopy 22:1143–1145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ruiz AL, Kelly M, Nutton RW (2002) Arthroscopic ACL reconstruction: a 5–9 year follow-up. Knee 9:197–200

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Scavenius M, Bak K, Hansen S, Norring K, Jensen KH, Jorgensen U (1999) Isolated total ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament—a clinical study with long-term follow-up of 7 years. Scand J Med Sci Sports 9:114–119

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Snyder-Mackler L, Fitzgerald GK, Bartolozzi AR 3rd, Ciccotti MG (1997) The relationship between passive joint laxity and functional outcome after anterior cruciate ligament injury. Am J Sports Med 25:191–195

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Strehl A, Eggli S (2007) The value of conservative treatment in ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). J Trauma 62:1159–1162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wittenberg RH, Oxfort HU, Plafki C (1998) A comparison of conservative and delayed surgical treatment of anterior cruciate ligament ruptures. A matched pair analysis. Int Orthop 22:145–148

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yao L, Gentili A, Petrus L, Lee JK (1995) Partial ACL rupture: an MR diagnosis? Skeletal Radiol 24:247–251

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zantop T, Brucker PU, Vidal A, Zelle BA, Fu FH (2007) Intraarticular rupture pattern of the ACL. Clin Orthop Relat Res 454:48–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sang Soo Eun.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ahn, J.H., Chang, M.J., Lee, Y.S. et al. Non-operative treatment of ACL rupture with mild instability. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 130, 1001–1006 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-010-1077-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-010-1077-4

Keywords

Navigation