Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Do locking plates have a role in orthopaedic oncological reconstruction

  • Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Role of locking plate in skeletal reconstruction after resection of bone tumours in Indian patients.

Materials and methods

Retrospective evaluation of skeletal reconstruction using locking plate in 20 cases of long bone tumours was done. Reconstruction was done in 12 patients following limb salvage surgery, internal fixation of pathological fracture in seven bone tumours and one angiomatous tumour. There were 12 females and 8 male patients.

Results

Average age at the time of surgery was 30.1 years (range 10–58). Minimum follow-up was 11 months (range 11–38). Average time for union in pathological fractures was 4 weeks and 120 days after limb salvage surgery. Vicryl mesh was used to contain the morcellized allograft and cancellous iliac crest in 17 cases. Eighteen reconstructions were intact at an average follow-up of 17 months. Two failed reconstructions included one plate breakage and one screw pull out.

Conclusion

Use of locking plate does not ensure the bony union at the site of reconstruction but it expedite it and allow early mobilization of joints and weight bearing particularly in Indian patients with late presentations. Careful selection of patients and proper preoperative planning including length of resection are essential for optimal outcomes and to minimize complications. Reconstruction should be supported by cortico-cancellous autograft/allograft for stabilization and union at junction of host and autograft/allograft bone and should be given adequate protection. Vicryl mesh helps in containing the morcellized grafts along the long axis of reconstruction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Buecker PJ, Berenstein M, Gebhardt MC, Hornicek FJ, Mankin HJ (2006) Locking versus standard plates for allograft fixation after tumour resection in children and adolescents. J Paediatr Orthop 26(5):680–685

    Google Scholar 

  2. Virkus WW, Miller BJ, Chye PC, Gitelis S (2008) The use of locking plates in orthopaedic oncology reconstructions. Orthopaedics 31(5):438

    Google Scholar 

  3. Holt GE, Griffin AM, Pintilie M et al (2005) Fractures following radiotherapy and limb-salvage surgery for lower extremity soft-tissue sarcomas: a comparison of high-dose and low-dose radiotherapy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(2):315–319

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gainor BJ, Buchert P (1983) Fracture healing in metastatic bone disease. Clin Orthop Relat Res 178:297–302

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wagner M (2003) General principles for the clinical use of the LCP. Injury 34(Suppl 2):B31–B42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Biau D, Faure F, Katsahian S, Jeanro C, Tomeno B, Anract P (2006) Survival of total knee replacement with a megaprosthesis after bone tumor resection. JBJS (Am) 88:1285–1293

    Google Scholar 

  7. Egol KA, Kubiak EN, Fulkerson E, Kummer FJ, Koval KJ (2004) Biomechanics of locked plates and screws. J Orthop Trauma 18:488–493

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Haidukewych GJ (2004) Innovations in locking plate technology. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 12(4):205–212

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yukata K, Doi K, Hattori Y, Sakamoto S (2009) Early breakage of a titanium volar locking plate for fixation of a distal radius fracture: case report. J Hand Surg Am 34(5):907–909

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Muscolo DL, Ayerza MA, Aponte-Tinao LA, Ranalletta M (2004) Partial epiphyseal preservation and intercalary allograft reconstruction in high-grade metaphyseal osteosarcoma of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86(12):2686–2693

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

No financial or any otherwise support has been received in any regard from any organization or institution for this study. All authors have contributed for the study and publication of this case report and agree in congruence to the same. Permission from the Institutional Review Board was taken for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashok Kumar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rastogi, S., Kumar, A. & Khan, S.A. Do locking plates have a role in orthopaedic oncological reconstruction. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 130, 1493–1497 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-010-1066-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-010-1066-7

Keywords

Navigation