Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A customized modular reference array clamp for navigated spine surgery

  • Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The current authors have developed a modular system of reference array fixation which is tailored specifically to the spinal level being operated upon. They believe that this system may further increase the precision and accuracy of pedicle screw placement.

Materials and methods

Two formalin-fixed whole body cadavers were used for this study. For cervical spine evaluation of the reference clamp, four odontoid screws (two per cadaver) for C1/C2-fusion and four lateral mass screws (two per cadaver) were implanted. Following navigated screw placement with 2D and 3D fluoroscopic verification, insertion of two lateral mass screws was performed. In the same way, lumbar and thoracic pedicle screws were implanted. Two pedicle screws were placed at two levels of the lumbar and two levels of the thoracic areas giving an overall of 16 screws implanted (8 cervical, 4 thoracic, and 4 lumbar). Postoperative evaluation involved comparison of postoperative 3D scans and preoperative planning images. A simple classification system was used for evaluation of any deviation from the planned trajectory.

Results

All pedicle screw placements were performed as planned without any technical problems. The reference array clamps remained in position at all the spinal levels at which they were employed with no loosening or displacement and no secondary damage to any of the spinous processes. Manual manipulation was performed but no displacement or slippage was observed. Image artefacts caused by the reference clamp were not significant as to obscure the area of interest. Both imaging modalities (Iso-C 3D and Vario 3D) generated sufficiently precise 3D images. There was no substantial difference in quality when those two systems were compared.

Discussion

Insufficient fixation of the reference clamp can lead to failure and complications. To date, no reference clamp systems have been developed specifically for navigated spine surgery.

Conclusions

Stable reference array fixation is a critical step in navigated surgery. To date, the same reference clamps have been applied to the spinal anatomy as have been developed originally for the appendicular skeleton. The current investigators have developed a novel modular clamp and have demonstrated its efficacy in a cadaveric model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amiot LP, Lang K, Putzier M et al (2000) Comparative results between conventional and computer-assisted pedicle screw installation in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine. Spine 25:606–614

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Board TN, Kendoff D, Citak M et al (2008) Soft tissue dissection in placement of reference markers during computer aided total hip arthroplasty. Comput Aided Surg 13:218–224

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bottros J, Klika AK, Lee HH et al (2008) The use of navigation in total knee arthroplasty for patients with extra-articular deformity. J Arthroplasty 23:74–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Castro WH, Halm H, Jerosch J et al (1996) Accuracy of pedicle screw placement in lumbar vertebrae. Spine 21:1320–1324

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Citak M, Board TN, Sun Y et al (2007) Reference marker stability in computer aided orthopedic surgery: a biomechanical study in artificial bone and cadavers. Technol Health Care 15:407–414

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Citak M, Haasper C, Kendoff D et al (2006) Preliminary clinical experience using a newly developed minimal-invasive reference base in computer-assisted foot surgery. Technol Health Care 14:515–519

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Citak M, Kendoff D, Wanich T et al (2008) The influence of metal artifacts on navigation and the reduction of artifacts by the use of polyether-ether-ketone. Comput Aided Surg 13:233–239

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dickman CA, Yahiro MA, Lu HT, Melkerson MN (1994) Surgical treatment alternatives for fixation of unstable fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine. A meta-analysis. Spine 19:2266S–2273S

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ebraheim NA, Xu R, Ahmad M, Yeasting RA (1997) Projection of the thoracic pedicle and its morphometric analysis. Spine 22:233–238

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Esses SI, Sachs BL, Dreyzin V (1993) Complications associated with the technique of pedicle screw fixation. A selected survey of ABS members. Spine 18:2231–2238 (discussion 8–9)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gertzbein SD, Robbins SE (1990) Accuracy of pedicular screw placement in vivo. Spine 15:11–14

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jerosch J, Malms J, Castro WH et al (1992) Accuracy of pedicle screws following instrumented dorsal fusion of the lumbar spine. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 130:479–483

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Laine T, Lund T, Ylikoski M et al (2000) Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion with and without computer assistance: a randomised controlled clinical study in 100 consecutive patients. Eur Spine J 9:235–240

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ludwig SC, Kramer DL, Balderston RA et al (2000) Placement of pedicle screws in the human cadaveric cervical spine: comparative accuracy of three techniques. Spine 25:1655–1667

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mayr E, de la Barrera JL, Eller G et al. The effect of fixation and location on the stability of the markers in navigated total hip arthroplasty: a cadaver study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:168–172

  16. Nolte LP, Beutler T (2004) Basic principles of CAOS. Injury 35(Suppl 1):SA6–SA16

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nolte LP, Steffen R, Kramer J, Jergas M (1993) Fixateur interne: a comparative biomechanical study of various systems. Aktuelle Traumatol 23:20–26

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nolte LP, Zamorano LJ, Jiang Z et al (1995) Image-guided insertion of transpedicular screws. A laboratory set-up. Spine 20:497–500

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ohnsorge JA, Weisskopf M, Siebert CH (2005) epiDRB––a new minimally invasive concept for referencing in the field of computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 143:316–322

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pitto RP, Malak S, Anderson IA (2009) Accuracy of a computer-assisted navigation system in resurfacing hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 33(2):391–395

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rampersaud YR, Simon DA, Foley KT (2001) Accuracy requirements for image-guided spinal pedicle screw placement. Spine 26:352–359

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Romanowski JR, Swank ML (2008) Imageless navigation in hip resurfacing: avoiding component malposition during the surgeon learning curve. J Bone Joint Surg 90 Suppl 3:65–70

    Google Scholar 

  23. Roy-Camille R, Roy-Camille M, Demeulenaere C (1970) Osteosynthesis of dorsal, lumbar, and lumbosacral spine with metallic plates screwed into vertebral pedicles and articular apophyses. La Presse medicale 78:1447–1448

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Schulze CJ, Munzinger E, Weber U (1998) Clinical relevance of accuracy of pedicle screw placement. A computed tomographic-supported analysis. Spine 23:2215–2220 (discussion 20–21)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Vaccaro AR, Rizzolo SJ, Balderston RA et al (1995) Placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine. Part II: An anatomical and radiographic assessment. J Bone Joint Surg 77:1200–1206

    Google Scholar 

  26. Vahldiek MJ, Panjabi MM (1998) Stability potential of spinal instrumentations in tumor vertebral body replacement surgery. Spine 23:543–550

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Yuan HA, Garfin SR, Dickman CA, Mardjetko SM (1994) A historical cohort study of pedicle screw fixation in thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spinal fusions. Spine 19:2279S–2296S

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

None of the authors have any financial or personal relationships with other people, or organizations, that could inappropriately influence (bias) their work, within 3 years of the beginning of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Musa Citak.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

O’Loughlin, P.F., Daentzer, D., Hüfner, T. et al. A customized modular reference array clamp for navigated spine surgery. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 130, 1475–1480 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-010-1060-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-010-1060-0

Keywords

Navigation