Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Arthroplasty: critical scientometric analysis of current benchmarking and evaluation procedures

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Groneberg-Kloft B, Scutaru C, Kreiter C, Kolzow S, Fischer A, Quarcoo D (2008) Institutional operating figures in basic and applied sciences: scientometric analysis of quantitative output benchmarking. Health Res Policy Syst 6:6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Groneberg-Kloft B, Kreiter C, Welte T, Fischer A, Quarcoo D, Scutaru C (2008) Interfield dysbalances in research input and output benchmarking: visualisation by density equalizing procedures. Int J Health Geogr 7:48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Andersen J, Belmont J, Cho CT (2006) Journal impact factor in the era of expanding literature. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 39:436–443

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Smith DR (2008) Citation analysis and impact factor trends of 5 core journals in occupational medicine, 1985–2006. Arch Environ Occup Health 63:114–122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Norman Schöffel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schöffel, N., Spallek, M., Scutaru, C. et al. Arthroplasty: critical scientometric analysis of current benchmarking and evaluation procedures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 130, 293–296 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-009-1007-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-009-1007-5

Keywords

Navigation