Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Retrospective and consecutive analysis of the long-term outcomes of the SBG stem: a 15-year follow-up study

  • Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

In 1991, 230 cementless total hip arthroplasties (THAs) with anatomical Stolzalpe-Buchner-Graf (SBG) stems were implanted in 230 patients at our hospital. Patients were examined retrospectively and consecutively 15 years after the operations.

Methods

In total, 118 patients were available for follow-up (average 12.8 ± 3.8 years postoperatively), with 44 examined clinically/radiologically at our hospital and 74 interviewed by telephone. Five THAs needed revision (stem explantation), three for aseptic loosening. Average patient age at the time of surgery was 61 years (27–91 years). For all THAs, we implanted ceramic-to-metal heads in combination with ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene inlay (ceramic/polyethylene and metal/polyethylene articulating components).

Results

The survival rate of the SBG stem was 98.13% (CI 94.32–99.39%) with aseptic loosening as the endpoint and 96.98% (CI 92.85–98.74%) with revision and stem explantation for any other reason as the endpoint. The average Harris Hip Score was 36.0 ± 6.9 (range 22–45) preoperatively, increasing to 88.2 ± 15.3 (30–100) for clinically evaluated patients and 80.3 ± 11.3 (27–91) for telephone-interviewed patients at 15 years postoperatively. Osteolysis and radiolucent lines around the prosthetic stem were rarely observed (mainly at the proximal diaphysis).

Conclusion

These follow-up results emphasize the excellent long-term outcomes associated with the SBG stem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC (1979) “Modes of failure” of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res 141:17–27

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Zweymüller K, Samek V (1990) Radiologische Erkenntnisse der Titaniumpfanne. In: Zweymüller K (ed) 10 Jahre Zweymüller-Hüftendoprothese. Verlag Hans Huber, Bern, pp 35–46

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zweymüller K, Samek V (1990) Radiologische Grundphänomene des Titanium-Gradschaftes. In: Zweymüller K (ed) 10 Jahre Zweymüller-Hüftendoprothese. Verlag Hans Huber, Bern, pp 23–34

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, Riley LH Jr (1973) Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am 55:1629–1632

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Crenshaw AA Jr (1998) Surgical techniques and approaches. In: Canale ST (ed) Campbell’s operative orthopaedics, 9th edn. Mosby, Missouri, pp 84–90

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wurnig C, Eyb R, Auersperg V (1992) Indomethacin for prevention of ectopic ossification in cementless hip arthroplasties. A prospective 1-year study of 100 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 63:628–630

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Effenberger H, Graf R, May M et al (2004) Anatomically adapted, HA coated SBG stem—ten years of successful implantation. Biomed Techn 49:290–294

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Engh CA, Massin P, Suthers KE (1990) Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components. Clin Orthop 257:107–128

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Panisello JJ, Herrero L, Herrera A et al (2006) Bone remodelling after total hip arthroplasty using an uncemented anatomic femoral stem: a three-year prospective study using bone densitometry. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 14:32–37

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. van der Wal BC, de Kramer BJ, Grimm B et al (2007) Femoral fit in ABG-II hip stems, influence on clinical outcome and bone remodeling: a radiographic study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128:1065–1072

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. van der Wal BC, Rahmy A, Grimm B, Heyligers I, Tonino A (2008) Preoperative bone quality as a factor in dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry analysis comparing bone remodelling between two implant types. Int Orthop 32:39–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Panisello JJ, Canales V, Herrero L et al (2008) Changes in periprosthetic bone remodelling after redesigning an anatomic cementless stem. Int Orthop Jan 11 [Epub ahead of print]

  13. Incavo SJ, Schneider R, Elting J (1998) The effect of surface coating of femoral prostheses implanted without cement: a 2- to 4-year follow-up study. Am J Orthop 27:355–361

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lintner F, Böhm G, Huber M, Scholz R (1994) Histology of tissue adjacent to an HAC-coated femoral prosthesis. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76:824–830

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Soballe KS, Overgaard S (1996) The current status of hydroxyapatite coating of prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78:689–691

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Landor I, Vavrik P, Sosna A, Jahoda D, Hahn J, Daniel M (2007) Hydroxyapatite porous coating and the osteointegration of the total hip replacement. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 127:81–89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Grochola LF, Habermann B, Mastrodomenico N, Kurth A (2008) Comparison of periprosthetic bone remodeling after implantation of anatomic and straight stem prostheses in total hip arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128:383–392

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors did not receive any funding related to this study.

Conflict of interest statement

No conflicts of interest are declared.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Azizbaig Mohajer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Azizbaig Mohajer, M., Hofmann, F. & Graf, R. Retrospective and consecutive analysis of the long-term outcomes of the SBG stem: a 15-year follow-up study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 130, 185–190 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-009-0929-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-009-0929-2

Keywords

Navigation