Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Impaction bone grafting for acetabular reconstruction: mean 5.5-year results in Japanese patients

  • Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

We performed a retrospective outcome study on 23 consecutive acetabular reconstructions involving impaction bone grafting in Japanese patients.

Method

Two hips had cavitary defects, and 21 hips had combined segmental and cavitary defects. The mid-term follow-up was performed at a mean of 5.5 years postoperatively. The mean Merle d’Aubigné and Postel hip score had improved from 11.5 to 15.7 points at the final follow-up. Two hips showed migration at 30 months after surgery, and one of these was a candidate for re-revision due to symptomatic cup migration.

Results

The Kaplan–Meier survival rate of the cup, with loosening and re-operation as the end points, was 91.3 and 95.7% at 5 years, respectively.

Conclusion

Acetabular impaction bone grafting is a reproducible technique in which surgeons should strictly follow the recommended technical procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig 4
Fig 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Slooff TJJH, Huiskes R, van Horn J et al (1984) Bone grafting in total hip replacement for acetabular protrusion. Acta Orthop Scand 55:593–596

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Slooff TJ, Buma P, Schreurs BW et al (1996) Acetabular and femoral reconstruction with impacted graft and cement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 324:108–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Schreurs BW, Bolder SBT, Gardeniers JWM et al (2004) Acetabular revision with impacted morsellized cancellous bone grafting and a cemented cup: a 15- to 20-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86B:492–497

    Google Scholar 

  4. Comba F, Buttaro M, Pusso R et al (2006) Acetabular reconstruction with impacted bone allografts and cemented acetabular components: a 2- to 13-year follow-up study of 142 aseptic revisions. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88B:865–869

    Google Scholar 

  5. van Haaren EH, Heyligers IC, Alexander FGM et al (2007) High rate of failure of impaction grafting in large acetabular defects. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89B:296–300

    Google Scholar 

  6. D’Antonio JA, Capello WN, Borden LS et al (1989) Classification and management of acetabular abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 243:126–137

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gie GA, Linder L, Ling RS et al (1993) Impacted cancellous allografts and cement for revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75B:14–21

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mandziak DG, Howie DW, Neale SD et al (2007) Cement-within-cement stem exchange using the collarless polished double-taper stem. J Arthroplasty 22:1000–1006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Merle d’Aubigné R, Postel M (1954) Functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 36A:451–475

    Google Scholar 

  10. DeLee JG, Charnley J (1976) Radiological demarcation of cemented cups in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 121:20–32

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hodgkinson JP, Shelley P, Wroblewski BM (1988) The correlation between the roentgenographic appearance and operative findings at the bone-cement junction of the cup in Charnley low friction arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 228:105–109

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kaplan EL, Meier P (1958) Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53:457–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Whaley AL, Berry DJ, Harmsen WS (2001) Extra-large uncemented hemispherical acetabular components for revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83A:1352–1357

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ito H, Matsuno T, Aoki Y et al (2003) Acetabular components without bulk bone graft in revision surgery: a 5- to 13-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 18:134–139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Abeyta PN, Namba RS, Janku GV et al (2008) Reconstruction of major segmental acetabular defects with an Oblong-shaped cementless prosthesis. A long-term outcomes study. J Arthroplasty 23:247–253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kerboull M, Hamadouche M, Kerboull L (2000) The Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device in major acetabular reconstructions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 378:155–168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tanaka C, Shikata J, Ikenaga M et al (2007) Acetabular reconstruction using a Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement device and hydroxyapatite granules. a 3- to 8-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 18:719–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kawanabe K, Akiyama H, Onishi F et al (2007) Revision total hip replacement using the Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device with morsellized or bulk graft. Results at a mean follow-up of 8.7 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89B:26–31

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lunn JV, Kearns SS, Quinlan W et al (2005) Impaction allografting and the Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device: 35 hips followed for 3–7 years. Acta Orthop Scand 76:296–302

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gerber A, Pisan M, Zurakowski D et al (2003) Ganz reinforcement ring for reconstruction of acetabular defects in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85A:2358–2364

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gie GA (1999) Femoral bone grafting: intramedullary impaction grafting. In: Steinberg ME, Garino JP (eds) Revision total hip arthroplasty. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 281–297

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bolder SBT, Schreurs BW, Verdonschot N et al (2003) Particle size of bone graft and method of impaction affect initial stability of cemented cups. Human cadaveric and synthetic pelvic specimen studies. Acta Orthop Scand 74:652–657

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dunlop DG, Brewster NT, Madabhushi SPG et al (2003) Techniques to improve the shear strength of impacted bone graft. The effect of particle size and washing of the graft. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85A:639–646

    Google Scholar 

  24. Board TN, Rooney P, Kay PR (2008) Strain imparted during impaction grafting may contribute to bony incorporation. An in vitro study of the release of BMP-7 from allograft. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90B:821–824

    Google Scholar 

  25. Manus U, Andereya S, Gravius S et al (2008) How to store autologous bone graft perioperatively: an in vitro study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128:1007–1011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Enneking WF, Mindell ER (1991) Observations on massive retrieved human allografts. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73A:1123–1142

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hooten JP Jr, Engh CA, Heekin RS et al (1996) Structural bulk allografts in acetabular reconstruction: analysis of two grafts retrieved at post-mortem. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78B:270–275

    Google Scholar 

  28. van der Donk S, Buma P, Slooff TJJH et al (2002) Incorporation of morsellized bone grafts: a study of 24 acetabular biopsy specimens. Clin Orthop Relat Res 396:131–141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hamamatsu Medical Center, 328 Tomitsuka-cho, Naka-ku, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, 432-8580, Japan

    Toshiki Iwase, Tetsuo Masui & Atsushi Kouyama

  2. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Okazaki City Hospital, Okazaki, Aichi, Japan

    Yukio Torii

Authors
  1. Toshiki Iwase
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tetsuo Masui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yukio Torii
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Atsushi Kouyama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toshiki Iwase.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Iwase, T., Masui, T., Torii, Y. et al. Impaction bone grafting for acetabular reconstruction: mean 5.5-year results in Japanese patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 130, 433–439 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-009-0904-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-009-0904-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation