Skip to main content

Computer-assisted antetorsion control prevents malrotation in femoral nailing: an experimental study and preliminary clinical case series

Abstract

Materials and methods

The effect of fluoroscopy-based navigation for femoral fracture reduction on the prevention of malrotation was examined in an experimental setting followed by a first case series. Eleven cadaver femurs were used. All femurs were reduced by closed methods. An optoelectronic navigation system was utilized to check for fragment reduction and alignment. Fluoroscopic control without navigation was used as the control group. The Six Sigma Analysis [offset capability index (C pk) = 1.3] was used to compare the probability of outliers of more than 15°. In the clinical case series the same navigation tool was used in ten non-consecutive patients with femoral fractures. Torsional differences between both legs were measured postoperatively by CT scan.

Results

The highest malrotation in the navigated group was 7.0° for the cadaver testings, while two femurs in the control group showed a difference of more than 10° (10.3°, 17.4°). Only the navigated group showed a sufficient offset capability index (C pk-navigated = 1.83; C pk-conventional = 0.59). In the clinical series nine femurs were successfully reduced by navigation control. The average malrotation was 6.6°. No patient had a torsional difference of more than 10°.

Conclusion

Navigated femoral nailing reduces the risk for outliers of postoperative torsional differences and might avoid revision surgery for malrotation.

Level of evidence

IV.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Hernandez RJ, Tachdjian MO, Poznanski AK, Dias LS (1981) CT determination of femoral torsion. AJR Am J Roentgenol 137:97–101

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Prevot N, Charissoux JL, Fiorenza F, Arnaud JP, Pecout C (1998) Utilisation d’un clou non fendu de Russel-Taylor pour la stabilisation des fractures du femur. A propos de 57 fractures avec 30 etudes tomodensitometriques de la rotation. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 84:33–40

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Strecker W, Suger G, Kinzl L (1996) Lokale Komplikationen der Marknagelung. Orthopade 25:274–291

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Stephen DJ, Kreder HJ, Schemitsch EH, Conlan LB, Wild L, McKee MD (2002) Femoral intramedullary nailing: comparison of fracture-table and manual traction: a prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A:1514–1521

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jaarsma RL, Pakvis DF, Verdonschot N, Biert J, van Kampen A (2004) Rotational malalignment after intramedullary nailing of femoral fractures. J Orthop Trauma 18:403–409

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Strecker W, Keppler P, Gebhard F, Kinzl L (1997) Length and torsion of the lower limb. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79:1019–1023

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Strecker W, Hoellen I, Keppler P, Suger G, Kinzl L (1997) Torsionskorrekturen nach Marknagelosteosynthesen der unteren Extremität. Unfallchirurg 100:29–38

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jaarsma RL, Ongkiehong BF, Gruneberg C, Verdonschot N, Duysens J, van Kampen A (2004) Compensation for rotational malalignment after intramedullary nailing for femoral shaft fractures. An analysis by plantar pressure measurements during gait. Injury 35:1270–1278

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Krettek C, Miclau T, Grun O, Schandelmaier P, Tscherne H (1998) Intraoperative control of axes, rotation and length in femoral and tibial fractures. Technical note. Injury 29(Suppl 3):C29–C39

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jaarsma RL, Verdonschot N, van der Venne R, van Kampen A (2005) Avoiding rotational malalignment after fractures of the femur by using the profile of the lesser trochanter: an in vitro study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 125:184–187

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hilgert RE, Ohrendorf K, Schafer FK, Schafer PJ, Muller M, Trompetter R, Egbers HJ (2006) Bildwandlergestützte Vermeidung einer Torsionsabweichung zur Gegenseite bei der Oberschenkelmarknagelung. Unfallchirurg 109:855–861

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hofstetter R, Slomczykowski M, Krettek C, Koppen G, Sati M, Nolte LP (2000) Computer-assisted fluoroscopy-based reduction of femoral fractures and antetorsion correction. Comput Aided Surg 5:311–325

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hufner T, Pohlemann T, Tarte S, Gansslen A, Geerling J, Bazak N, Citak M, Nolte LP, Krettek C (2002) Computer-assisted fracture reduction of pelvic ring fractures: an in vitro study. Clin Orthop 399:231–239

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Westphal R, Winkelbach S, Gosling T, Hufner T, Faulstich J, Martin P, Krettek C, Wahl F (2006) A surgical telemanipulator for femur shaft fracture reduction. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 2:238–249

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Georgiadis GM, Burgar AM (2001) Percutaneous skeletal joysticks for closed reduction of femoral shaft fractures during intramedullary nailing. J Orthop Trauma 15:570–571

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Stiehl JB, Heck DA (2007) Six sigma analysis of computer-assisted surgery tracking protocols in TKA. Clin Orthop 464:105–110

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Müller ME, Nazarian S, Koch P, Schatzker J (1990) The comprehensive classification of fractures of long bones. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 128–137

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kendoff D, Citak M, Gardner MJ, Gosling T, Krettek C, Hufner T (2007) Navigated femoral nailing using noninvasive registration of the contralateral intact femur to restore anteversion. Technique and clinical use. J Orthop Trauma 21:725–730

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Grutzner PA, Suhm N (2004) Computer aided long bone fracture treatment. Injury 35(Suppl 1):S-64

    Google Scholar 

  20. Weil YA, Gardner MJ, Helfet DL, Pearle AD (2007) Computer navigation allows for accurate reduction of femoral fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 460:185–191

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Keil C, von Recum J, Nolte LP, Wentzensen A, Grutzner PA (2008) Bestimmung des Femur-Antetorsionswinkels mit einem fluoroskopiebasierten optoelektronischen Navigationssystem. Unfallchirurg 111:126–131

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bonutti P, Dethmers D, Stiehl JB (2008) Case report: femoral shaft fracture resulting from femoral tracker placement in navigated TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466(6):1499–1502

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Padraigh O’Loughlin for the contribution of his work for this manuscript and Bernhard Vaske for the statistical work.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Gösling.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gösling, T., Oszwald, M., Kendoff, D. et al. Computer-assisted antetorsion control prevents malrotation in femoral nailing: an experimental study and preliminary clinical case series. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129, 1521–1526 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-009-0871-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-009-0871-3

Keywords

  • Malrotation
  • Navigation
  • Femur
  • Fracture
  • Reduction