Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cup positioning in THA: current status and pitfalls. A systematic evaluation of the literature

  • Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The correct determination of cup orientation in THA regarding the intraoperative as well as the postoperative assessment due to the pelvic tilt and rotation with inexact incorporation of the pelvis is uncertain. The anterior pelvic plane (APP) seems to be the most reliable reference frame and computer-assisted navigation systems seem to provide the best tool for correct implantation to date. For the intraoperative assessment of the APP, the exact determination of the bony landmarks is mandatory. For the standard plain radiography, standardized positioning of the patient and approximation of pelvic tilt by a lateral view are mandatory. An additional CT must be carried out for certain indications. More emphasis has to be given to the individuality of pelvic tilt and range of motion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Ackland MK, Bourne WB, Uhthoff HK (1986) Anteversion of the acetabular cup. Measurement of angle after total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 68:409–413

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Amiot LP, Poulin F (2004) Computed tomography-based navigation for hip, knee, and spine surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 421:77–86

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Anda S, Svenningsen S, Grontvedt T, Benum P (1990) Pelvic inclination and spatial orientation of the acetabulum. A radiographic, computed tomographic and clinical investigation. Acta Radiol 31:389–394

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Archbold HA, Mockford B, Molloy D, McConway J, Ogonda L, Beverland D (2006) The transverse acetabular ligament: an aid to orientation of the acetabular component during primary total hip replacement: a preliminary study of 1,000 cases investigating postoperative stability. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:883–886

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Asayama I, Akiyoshi Y, Naito M, Ezoe M (2004) Intraoperative pelvic motion in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 19:992–997

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Aubry S, Marinescu A, Forterre O, Runge M, Garbuio P (2005) Definition of a reproducible method for acetabular anteversion measurement at CT. J Radiol 86:399–404

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Barrack RL (2003) Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: implant design and orientation. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 11:89–99

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Belei P, Skwara A, De La FM, Schkommodau E, Fuchs S, Wirtz DC, Kamper C, Radermacher K (2007) Fluoroscopic navigation system for hip surface replacement. Comput Aided Surg 12:160–167

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bernsmann K, Langlotz U, Ansari B, Wiese M (2001) Computer-assisted navigated cup placement of different cup types in hip arthroplasty—a randomised controlled trial. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 139:512–517

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bialecki P, Gusta A, Bohatyrewicz A, Ferenc M (2006) Luxation of the prothesis after total hip arthroplasty. Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol 71:21–24

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Blendea S, Eckman K, Jaramaz B, Levison TJ, Digioia AMIII (2005) Measurements of acetabular cup position and pelvic spatial orientation after total hip arthroplasty using computed tomography/radiography matching. Comput Aided Surg 10:37–43

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Blendea S, Troccaz J, Merloz P (2007) Accuracy measurements of acetabular cup positioning using CT less navigation. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 93:157–164

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Blendea S, Troccaz J, Ravey JN, Merloz P (2007) Image-free cup navigation inaccuracy: a two-study approach. Comput Aided Surg 12:176–180

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bosker BH, Verheyen CC, Horstmann WG, Tulp NJ (2007) Poor accuracy of freehand cup positioning during total hip arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 127:375–379

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Brodner W, Grubl A, Jankovsky R, Meisinger V, Lehr S, Gottsauner-Wolf F (2004) Cup inclination and serum concentration of cobalt and chromium after metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 19:66–70

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Callaghan JJ, Salvati EA, Pellicci PM, Wilson PD Jr, Ranawat CS (1985) Results of revision for mechanical failure after cemented total hip replacement, 1979 to 1982. A two to five-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67:1074–1085

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen WM, Engh CA Jr, Hopper RH Jr, McAuley JP, Engh CA (2000) Acetabular revision with use of a bilobed component inserted without cement in patients who have acetabular bone-stock deficiency. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82:197–206

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Chevrot A, Najman G (1983) Charnley-type total hip prosthesis. Radiological technic of angular measurements of the acetabular piece (anteversion). Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 69:483–485

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Collet C, Grosdidier G, Coudane H, Borrelly J (1985) Anatomical basis for study of acetabular migration of the prosthetic cup used in arthroplasty of the hip: a new technique for measurement of migration. Anat Clin 7:171–173

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Collis DK (1982) Long-term radiographic follow-up of total hip replacements. Hip 1–26

  21. Coudane H, Fery A, Sommelet J, Lacoste J, Leduc P, Gaucher A (1981) Aseptic loosening of cemented total arthroplasties of the hip in relation to positioning of the prosthesis. New utilization of the Tschuprow–Cramer statistical test. Acta Orthop Scand 52:201–205

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. D’Lima DD, Urquhart G, Buehler KO, Walker RH, Colwell CW Jr (2000) The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82:315–321

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dandachli W, Richards R, Sauret V, Cobb JP (2006) The transverse pelvic plane: a new and practical reference frame for hip arthroplasty. Comput Aided Surg 11:322–326

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Del SH Jr, Lipman AJ, Bannar SM, Livermore JT, Ilstrup D, Morrey BF (1998) Effects of acetabular abduction on cup wear rates in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 13:621–626

    Google Scholar 

  25. Delagoutte P, Mainard D, Dupuy M, Peltre G, G’Sell C (1991) Study of loosening and wear of total hip prosthesis. Apropos of a series followed-up over 10 years. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 77:25–33

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. DeWal H, Su E, DiCesare PE (2003) Instability following total hip arthroplasty. Am J Orthop 32:377–382

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. DiGioia AM, Jaramaz B, Blackwell M, Simon DA, Morgan F, Moody JE, Nikou C, Colgan BD, Aston CA, Labarca RS, Kischell E, Kanade T (1998) The Otto Aufranc Award. Image guided navigation system to measure intraoperatively acetabular implant alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 355:8–22

    Google Scholar 

  28. Digioia AMIII, Jaramaz B, Plakseychuk AY, Moody JE Jr, Nikou C, Labarca RS, Levison TJ, Picard F (2002) Comparison of a mechanical acetabular alignment guide with computer placement of the socket. J Arthroplasty 17:359–364

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Djerf K, Wahlstrom O, Hammerby S (1986) Loosening 5 years after total hip replacement—a radiological study of the McKee-Farrar and Charnley prostheses. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 105:339–342

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Dorr LD, Hishiki Y, Wan Z, Newton D, Yun A (2005) Development of imageless computer navigation for acetabular component position in total hip replacement. Iowa Orthop J 25:1–9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Dorr LD, Malik A, Wan Z, Long WT, Harris M (2007) Resurfacing for Perthes Disease: Precision and Bias of Imageless Computer Navigation and Surgeon Estimates for Acetabular Component Position. Clin Orthop Relat Res (in press)

  32. Doyle J, Murray P, Mahony PO, Farmer M, Hooper AC (1989) Acetabular cup-siting device for total hip arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 108:317–321

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Ebramzadeh E, Sangiorgio SN, Lattuada F, Kang JS, Chiesa R, McKellop HA, Dorr LD (2003) Accuracy of measurement of polyethylene wear with use of radiographs of total hip replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A:2378–2384

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Echeverri S, Leyvraz PF, Zambelli PY, Jolles BM (2006) Reliable acetabular cup orientation with a new gravity-assisted guidance system. J Arthroplasty 21:413–419

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Eddine TA, Migaud H, Chantelot C, Cotten A, Fontaine C, Duquennoy A (2001) Variations of pelvic anteversion in the lying and standing positions: analysis of 24 control subjects and implications for CT measurement of position of a prosthetic cup. Surg Radiol Anat 23:105–110

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Fabeck L, Farrokh D, Tolley M, Descamps PY, Gebhart M, Delince P (1999) A method to measure acetabular cup anteversion after total hip replacement. Acta Orthop Belg 65:485–491

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Falliner A, Muhle C, Brossmann J (2002) Acetabular inclination and anteversion in infants using 3D MR imaging. Acta Radiol 43:221–224

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Fontes D, Benoit J, Lortat-Jacob A, Didry R (1991) Luxation of total hip prosthesis. Mathematic modelization, biomechanical approach. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 77:151–162

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Fousek J, Indrakova P (2007) Total hip arthroplasty in post-dysplastic hip arthritis. Can type and position of the acetabular component influence longevity of the prosthesis? Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 74:47–54

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Frick SL, Kim SS, Wenger DR (2000) Pre- and postoperative three-dimensional computed tomography analysis of triple innominate osteotomy for hip dysplasia. J Pediatr Orthop 20:116–123

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Grutzner PA, Zheng G, Langlotz U, von Recum J, Nolte LP, Wentzensen A, Widmer KH, Wendl K (2004) C-arm based navigation in total hip arthroplasty-background and clinical experience. Injury 35(Suppl 1):S-A90–S-A95

    Google Scholar 

  42. Haaker R, Tiedjen K, Rubenthaler F, Stockheim M (2003) Computer-assisted navigated cup placement in primary and secondary dysplastic hips. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 141:105–111

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Haaker RG, Tiedjen K, Ottersbach A, Rubenthaler F, Stockheim M, Stiehl JB (2007) Comparison of conventional versus computer-navigated acetabular component insertion. J Arthroplasty 22:151–159

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Haenle M, Heitner A, Mittelmeier W, Barbano R, Scholz R, Steinhauser E, Bader R (2007) Assessment of cup position from plain radiographs: impact of pelvic tilting. Surg Radiol Anat 29:29–35

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Hassan DM, Johnston GH, Dust WN, Watson LG, Cassidy D (1995) Radiographic calculation of anteversion in acetabular prostheses. J Arthroplasty 10:369–372

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. He RX, Yan SG, Wu LD, Wang XH, Dai XS (2007) Position of the prosthesis and the incidence of dislocation following total hip replacement. Chin Med J (Engl) 120:1140–1144

    Google Scholar 

  47. Hirakawa K, Mitsugi N, Koshino T, Saito T, Hirasawa Y, Kubo T (2001) Effect of acetabular cup position and orientation in cemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 388:135–142

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Honl M, Schwieger K, Gauck CH, Lampe F, Morlock MM, Wimmer MA, Hille E (2005) Comparison of total hip replacements cup orientation and position. Navigation vs. conventional manual implantation of hip prostheses. Orthopade 34:1131–1136

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Honl M, Schwieger K, Salineros M, Jacobs J, Morlock M, Wimmer M (2006) Orientation of the acetabular component. A comparison of five navigation systems with conventional surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:1401–1405

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Hube R, Birke A, Hein W, Klima S (2003) CT-based and fluoroscopy-based navigation for cup implantation in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Surg Technol Int 11:275–280

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Jaramaz B, Digioia AMIII, Blackwell M, Nikou C (1998) Computer assisted measurement of cup placement in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 354:70–81

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Jaramaz B, Eckman K (2006) 2D/3D registration for measurement of implant alignment after total hip replacement. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv Int Conf Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 9:653–661

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Jolles BM, Genoud P, Hoffmeyer P (2004) Computer-assisted cup placement techniques in total hip arthroplasty improve accuracy of placement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 426:174–179

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Jolles BM, Zangger P, Leyvraz PF (2002) Factors predisposing to dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: a multivariate analysis. J Arthroplasty 17:282–288

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Kalteis T, Beckmann J, Herold T, Zysk S, Bathis H, Perlick L, Grifka J (2004) Accuracy of an image-free cup navigation system—an anatomical study. Biomed Tech (Berl) 49:257–262

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Kalteis T, Handel M, Bathis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, Grifka J (2006) Imageless navigation for insertion of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty: is it as accurate as CT-based navigation? J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:163–167

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Kalteis T, Handel M, Herold T, Perlick L, Baethis H, Grifka J (2005) Greater accuracy in positioning of the acetabular cup by using an image-free navigation system. Int Orthop 29:272–276

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Kalteis T, Handel M, Herold T, Perlick L, Paetzel C, Grifka J (2006) Position of the acetabular cup—accuracy of radiographic calculation compared to CT-based measurement. Eur J Radiol 58:294–300

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Katada S, Ando K (1984) A rontgenographic evaluation of the indices for hip dysplasia in children influenced by pelvic tilt. In: Ueno R, Akamatsu N, Itami Y, Tagawa H, Yoshino S (eds) The hip. Clinical studies and basic research. Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, pp 137–140

    Google Scholar 

  60. Kennedy JG, Rogers WB, Soffe KE, Sullivan RJ, Griffen DG, Sheehan LJ (1998) Effect of acetabular component orientation on recurrent dislocation, pelvic osteolysis, polyethylene wear, and component migration. J Arthroplasty 13:530–534

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Kiefer H (2003) OrthoPilot cup navigation—how to optimise cup positioning? Int Orthop 27(Suppl 1):S37–S42

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Kluess D, Martin H, Mittelmeier W, Schmitz KP, Bader R (2007) Influence of femoral head size on impingement, dislocation and stress distribution in total hip replacement. Med Eng Phys 29:465–471

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Kojima A, Nakagawa T, Tohkura A (1998) Simulation of acetabular coverage of femoral head using anteroposterior pelvic radiographs. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 117:330–336

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Komeno M, Hasegawa M, Sudo A, Uchida A (2006) Computed tomographic evaluation of component position on dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics 29:1104–1108

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Konishi N, Mieno T (1993) Determination of acetabular coverage of the femoral head with use of a single anteroposterior radiograph. A new computerized technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75:1318–1333

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Kuhne JH (2000) Differences in hip prosthesis implantation in a non-urban region. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 138:419–424

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Kummer FJ, Shah S, Iyer S, DiCesare PE (1999) The effect of acetabular cup orientations on limiting hip rotation. J Arthroplasty 14:509–513

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Laffargue P, Pinoit Y, Tabutin J, Giraud F, Puget J, Migaud H (2006) Computer-assisted positioning of the acetabular cup for total hip arthroplasty based on joint kinematics without prior imaging: preliminary results with computed tomographic assessment. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 92:316–325

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Lazennec JY, Charlot N, Gorin M, Roger B, Arafati N, Bissery A, Saillant G (2004) Hip-spine relationship: a radio-anatomical study for optimization in acetabular cup positioning. Surg Radiol Anat 26:136–144

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Leenders T, Vandevelde D, Mahieu G, Nuyts R (2002) Reduction in variability of acetabular cup abduction using computer assisted surgery: a prospective and randomized study. Comput Aided Surg 7:99–106

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Leichtle U, Gosselke N, Wirth CJ, Rudert M (2007) Radiologic evaluation of cup placement variation in conventional total hip arthroplasty. Rofo 179:46–52

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Lembeck B, Mueller O, Reize P, Wuelker N (2005) Pelvic tilt makes acetabular cup navigation inaccurate. Acta Orthop 76:517–523

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, Compere CL, Zimmerman JR (1978) Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am 60:217–220

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Liaw CK, Hou SM, Yang RS, Wu TY, Fuh CS (2006) A new tool for measuring cup orientation in total hip arthroplasties from plain radiographs. Clin Orthop Relat Res 451:134–139

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Lind M, Krarup N, Petersen LG, Mikkelsen S, Horlyck E (2002) Acetabular revision for recurrent dislocations: results in 14 cases after 3 years of follow-up. Acta Orthop Scand 73:291–294

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Lokietek W, Legaye J, Bary JM, De CP, Trigaux J (1987) Radiological evaluation of cup anteversion in total hip prosthesis. Acta Orthop Belg 53:462–466

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Mahoney CR, Pellicci PM (2003) Complications in primary total hip arthroplasty: avoidance and management of dislocations. Instr Course Lect 52:247–255

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Malik A, Maheshwari A, Dorr LD (2007) Impingement with total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:1832–1842

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Mantwill F, Schulz AP, Faber A, Hollstein D, Kammal M, Fay A, Jurgens C (2005) Robotic systems in total hip arthroplasty—is the time ripe for a new approach? Int J Med Robot 1:8–19

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Marx A, Pfortner J, von Knoch M, Wiese M, Loer F, Saxler G (2006) Influence of the X-ray technique on evaluation of cup anteversion after total hip arthroplasty. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 144:394–399

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Marx A, von Knoch M, Pfortner J, Wiese M, Saxler G (2006) Misinterpretation of cup anteversion in total hip arthroplasty using planar radiography. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 126:487–492

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Masaoka T, Yamamoto K, Shishido T, Katori Y, Mizoue T, Shirasu H, Nunoda D (2006) Study of hip joint dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 30:26–30

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Mayr E, de la Barrera JL, Eller G, Bach C, Nogler M (2006) The effect of fixation and location on the stability of the markers in navigated total hip arthroplasty: a cadaver study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:168–172

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Mayr E, Kessler O, Prassl A, Rachbauer F, Krismer M, Nogler M (2005) The frontal pelvic plane provides a valid reference system for implantation of the acetabular cup: spatial orientation of the pelvis in different positions. Acta Orthop 76:848–853

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. McCollum DE, Gray WJ (1990) Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Causes and prevention. Clin Orthop Relat Res 261:159–170

    Google Scholar 

  86. McKibbin B (1970) Anatomical factors in the stability of the hip joint in the newborn. J Bone Joint Surg Br 52:148–159

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. McLaren RH (1973) Prosthetic hip angulation. Radiology 107:705–706

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Meek RM, Allan DB, McPhillips G, Kerr L, Howie CR (2006) Epidemiology of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 447:9–18

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Mian SW, Truchly G, Pflum FA (1992) Computed tomography measurement of acetabular cup anteversion and retroversion in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 276:206–209

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Minoda Y, Kadowaki T, Kim M (2006) Acetabular component orientation in 834 total hip arthroplasties using a manual technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res 445:186–191

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Moore KD, Barrack RL, Sychterz CJ, Sawhney J, Yang AM, Engh CA (2000) The effect of weight-bearing on the radiographic measurement of the position of the femoral head after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82:62–69

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. Morrey BF (1997) Difficult complications after hip joint replacement. Dislocation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 344:179–187

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Muller O, Lembeck B, Reize P, Wulker N (2005) Quantification and visualization of the influence of pelvic tilt upon measurement of acetabular inclination and anteversion. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 143:72–78

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. Muller O, Reize P, Trappmann D, Wulker N (2006) Measuring anatomical acetabular cup orientation with a new X-ray technique. Comput Aided Surg 11:69–75

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Murray DW (1993) The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75:228–232

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. Nadzadi ME, Pedersen DR, Callaghan JJ, Brown TD (2002) Effects of acetabular component orientation on dislocation propensity for small-head-size total hip arthroplasty. Clin Biomech(Bristol, Avon) 17:32–40

    Google Scholar 

  97. Nakamura S, Matsuda K, Arai N, Kobayashi M, Wakimoto N, Matsushita T (2006) Method to reduce variations of inclination angle of the acetabular component during mini-incision hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci 11:254–258

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Nishihara S, Sugano N, Nishii T, Ohzono K, Yoshikawa H (2003) Measurements of pelvic flexion angle using three-dimensional computed tomography. Clin Orthop Relat Res 411:140–151

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Nishii T, Sugano N, Miki H, Koyama T, Takao M, Yoshikawa H (2004) Influence of component positions on dislocation: computed tomographic evaluations in a consecutive series of total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 19:162–166

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Nogler M, Kessler O, Prassl A, Donnelly B, Streicher R, Sledge JB, Krismer M (2004) Reduced variability of acetabular cup positioning with use of an imageless navigation system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 426:159–163

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. O’Mahony PB, Doyle J, Murray P, Farmer MH, Hooper AC (1996) Radiographic assessment of acetabular prosthesis anteversion: an experimental study. Ir J Med Sci 165:10–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Oki H, Ando M, Omori H, Okumura Y, Negoro K, Uchida K, Baba H (2004) Relation between vertical orientation and stability of acetabular component in the dysplastic hip simulated by nonlinear three-dimensional finite element method. Artif Organs 28:1050–1054

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Olivecrona H, Weidenhielm L, Olivecrona L, Beckman MO, Stark A, Noz E, Maguire GQ Jr, Zeleznik MP, Svensson L, Jonson T (2004) A new CT method for measuring cup orientation after total hip arthroplasty: a study of 10 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 75:252–260

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Olivecrona H, Weidenhielm L, Olivecrona L, Noz ME, Maguire GQ Jr, Zeleznik MP, Svensson L, Jonson T (2003) Spatial component position in total hip arthroplasty. Accuracy and repeatability with a new CT method. Acta Radiol 44:84–91

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  105. Olivecrona L, Aspelin P, Weidenhielm L, Stark A, Noz ME, Maguire GQ Jr, Zeleznik MP, Svensson L, Olivecrona H (2005) Standard orientation of the pelvis: validation on a model and ten patients. Acta Radiol 46:74–82

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  106. Ottersbach A, Haaker R (2005) Optimization of cup positioning in THA—comparison between conventional mechanical instrumentation and computer-assisted implanted cups by using the orthopilot navigation system. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 143:611–615

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  107. Parratte S, Argenson JN (2007) Validation and usefulness of a computer-assisted cup-positioning system in total hip arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, controlled study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:494–499

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Patil S, Bergula A, Chen PC, Colwell CW Jr, D’Lima DD (2003) Polyethylene wear and acetabular component orientation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A(Suppl 4):56–63

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Pedersen DR, Callaghan JJ, Brown TD (2005) Activity-dependence of the “safe zone” for impingement versus dislocation avoidance. Med Eng Phys 27:323–328

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  110. Penney GP, Edwards PJ, Hipwell JH, Slomczykowski M, Revie I, Hawkes DJ (2007) Postoperative calculation of acetabular cup position using 2-D–3-D registration. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 54:1342–1348

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Pettersson H, Gentz CF, Lindberg HO, Carlsson AS (1982) Radiologic evaluation of the position of the acetabular component of the total hip prosthesis. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 23:259–263

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  112. Pierchon F, Pasquier G, Cotten A, Fontaine C, Clarisse J, Duquennoy A (1994) Causes of dislocation of total hip arthroplasty. CT study of component alignment. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76:45–48

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  113. Pradhan R (1999) Planar anteversion of the acetabular cup as determined from plain anteroposterior radiographs. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81:431–435

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  114. Richolt JA, Effenberger H, Rittmeister ME (2005) How does soft tissue distribution affect anteversion accuracy of the palpation procedure in image-free acetabular cup navigation? An ultrasonographic assessment. Comput Aided Surg 10:87–92

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Richolt JA, Rittmeister ME (2006) Misinterpretation of the anteversion in computer-assisted acetabular cup navigation as a result of a simplified palpation method of the frontal pelvic plane. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 144:305–310

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  116. Rittmeister M, Callitsis C (2006) Factors influencing cup orientation in 500 consecutive total hip replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 445:192–196

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  117. Robinson A (1922) Pelvis. In: Robinson A (ed) Cunningham`s Textbook of Anatomy vol 5. Henry Frowde & Stoughton, London, pp 255–260

    Google Scholar 

  118. Sarmiento A, Ebramzadeh E, Gogan WJ, McKellop HA (1990) Cup containment and orientation in cemented total hip arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Br 72:996–1002

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  119. Saxler G, Marx A, Vandevelde D, Langlotz U, Tannast M, Wiese M, Michaelis U, Kemper G, Grutzner PA, Steffen R, von Knoch M, Holland-Letz T, Bernsmann K (2004) The accuracy of free-hand cup positioning—a CT based measurement of cup placement in 105 total hip arthroplasties. Int Orthop 28:198–201

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  120. Saxler G, Marx A, Vandevelde D, Langlotz U, Tannast M, Wiese M, Michaelis U, Kemper G, Grutzner PA, Steffen R, von Knoch M, Holland-Letz T, Bernsmann K (2004) Cup placement in hip replacement surgery—A comparison of free-hand and computer assisted cup placement in total hip arthroplasty—a multi-center study. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 142:286–291

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  121. Sellers RG, Lyles D, Dorr LD (1988) The effect of pelvic rotation on alpha and theta angles in total hip arthroplasty. Contemp Orthop 17:67–70

    Google Scholar 

  122. Seradge H, Nagle KR, Miller RJ (1982) Analysis of version in the acetabular cup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 166:152–157

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. Shon WY, Baldini T, Peterson MG, Wright TM, Salvati EA (2005) Impingement in total hip arthroplasty a study of retrieved acetabular components. J Arthroplasty 20:427–435

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Siebel T, Wc Kafer (2005) Clinical outcome following robotic assisted versus conventional total hip arthroplasty: a controlled and prospective study of seventy-one patients. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 143:391–398

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  125. Siebenrock KA, Kalbermatten DF, Ganz R (2003) Effect of pelvic tilt on acetabular retroversion: a study of pelves from cadavers. Clin Orthop Relat Res 407:241–248

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  126. Soong M, Rubash HE, Macaulay W (2004) Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 12:314–321

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Sotereanos NG, Miller MC, Smith B, Hube R, Sewecke JJ, Wohlrab D (2006) Using intraoperative pelvic landmarks for acetabular component placement in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 21:832–840

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Spencer JM, Day RE, Sloan KE, Beaver RJ (2006) Computer navigation of the acetabular component: a cadaver reliability study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:972–975

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  129. Stiehl JB, Heck DA, Jaramaz B, Amiot LP (2007) Comparison of fluoroscopic and imageless registration in surgical navigation of the acetabular component. Comput Aided Surg 12:116–124

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  130. Stiehl JB, Heck DA, Lazzeri M (2005) Accuracy of acetabular component positioning with a fluoroscopically referenced CAOS system. Comput Aided Surg 10:321–327

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  131. Stipcak V, Hart R, Kucera B (2006) Our experience with an image guided navigation system for accurate alignment in total hip replacement by minimally invasive posterolateral surgery. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 73:350–352

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  132. Stipcak V, Stoklas J, Hart R, Janecek M (2004) Implantation of a non-cemented acetabulum with the use of a navigation system. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 71:288–291

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  133. Sugano N, Nishii T, Miki H, Yoshikawa H, Sato Y, Tamura S (2007) Mid-term results of cementless total hip replacement using a ceramic-on-ceramic bearing with and without computer navigation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89:455–460

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  134. Sugano N, Sasama T, Sato Y, Nakajima Y, Nishii T, Yonenobu K, Tamura S, Ochi T (2001) Accuracy evaluation of surface-based registration methods in a computer navigation system for hip surgery performed through a posterolateral approach. Comput Aided Surg 6:195–203

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  135. Tang WM, Chiu KY, Kwan MF, Ng TP (2007) Sagittal pelvic mal-rotation and positioning of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty: Three-dimensional computer model analysis. J Orthop Res 25:766–771

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  136. Tannast M, Langlotz F, Kubiak-Langer M, Langlotz U, Siebenrock KA (2005) Accuracy and potential pitfalls of fluoroscopy-guided acetabular cup placement. Comput Aided Surg 10:329–336

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  137. Tannast M, Langlotz U, Siebenrock KA, Wiese M, Bernsmann K, Langlotz F (2005) Anatomic referencing of cup orientation in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 436:144–150

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  138. Tannast M, Murphy SB, Langlotz F, Anderson SE, Siebenrock KA (2006) Estimation of pelvic tilt on anteroposterior X-rays–a comparison of six parameters. Skeletal Radiol 35:149–155

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  139. Thoren B, Sahlstedt B (1990) Influence of pelvic position on radiographic measurements of the prosthetic acetabular component. An experimental study on a pelvic model. Acta Radiol 31:133–136

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  140. Visser JD, Konings JG (1981) A new method for measuring angles after total hip arthroplasty. A study of the acetabular cup and femoral component. J Bone Joint Surg Br 63B:556–559

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  141. von Recum J, Wendl K, Korber J, Wentzensen A, Grutzner PA (2003) CT-free image guided acetabulum navigation in clinical routine. Unfallchirurg 106:929–934

    Google Scholar 

  142. Wentzensen A, Zheng G, Vock B, Langlotz U, Korber J, Nolte LP, Grutzner PA (2003) Image-based hip navigation. Int Orthop 27(Suppl 1):S43–S46

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  143. Widmer KH (2007) Containment versus impingement: finding a compromise for cup placement in total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 31(Suppl 1):S29–S33

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  144. Widmer KH (2004) A simplified method to determine acetabular cup anteversion from plain radiographs. J Arthroplasty 19:387–390

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  145. Widmer KH, Grutzner PA (2004) Joint replacement-total hip replacement with CT-based navigation. Injury 35(Suppl 1):S-A84–S-A89

    Google Scholar 

  146. Widmer KH, Majewski M (2005) The impact of the CCD-angle on range of motion and cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 20:723–728

    Google Scholar 

  147. Widmer KH, Zurfluh B (2004) Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion. J Orthop Res 22:815–821

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  148. Wixson RL, MacDonald MA (2005) Total hip arthroplasty through a minimal posterior approach using imageless computer-assisted hip navigation. J Arthroplasty 20:51–56

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  149. Wolf A, Digioia AMIII, Mor AB, Jaramaz B (2005) A kinematic model for calculating cup alignment error during total hip arthroplasty. J Biomech 38:2257–2265

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  150. Wolf A, Digioia AMIII, Mor AB, Jaramaz B (2005) Cup alignment error model for total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 437:132–137

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  151. Wroblewski BM (2000) Planar anteversion of the acetabular cup as determined from plain anteroposterior radiographs. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82:153

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  152. Yao L, Yao J, Gold RH (1995) Measurement of acetabular version on the axiolateral radiograph. Clin Orthop Relat Res 316:106–111

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  153. Yoshimine F (2006) The safe-zones for combined cup and neck anteversions that fulfill the essential range of motion and their optimum combination in total hip replacements. J Biomech 39:1315–1323

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  154. Yoshimine F (2005) The influence of the oscillation angle and the neck anteversion of the prosthesis on the cup safe-zone that fulfills the criteria for range of motion in total hip replacements. The required oscillation angle for an acceptable cup safe-zone. J Biomech 38:125–132

    Google Scholar 

  155. Yuan L, Shih C (1999) Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 119:263–266

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  156. Zheng G, Marx A, Langlotz U, Widmer KH, Buttaro M, Nolte LP (2002) A hybrid CT-free navigation system for total hip arthroplasty. Comput Aided Surg 7:129–145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  157. Zilber S, Lazennec JY, Gorin M, Saillant G (2004) Variations of caudal, central, and cranial acetabular anteversion according to the tilt of the pelvis. Surg Radiol Anat 26:462–465

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  158. Zwartele RE, Brand R, Doets HC (2004) Increased risk of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty in inflammatory arthritis: a prospective observational study of 410 hips. Acta Orthop Scand 75:684–690

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest and funding

The authors disclose any financial and other conflicts of interest that might bias this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany

    J. Beckmann, C. Lüring, M. Tingart, S. Anders, J. Grifka & F. X. Köck

  2. Asklepios Klinik Bad Abbach, Kaiser-Karl-V-Allee 3, 93077, Bad Abbach, Germany

    J. Beckmann

Authors
  1. J. Beckmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. C. Lüring
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Tingart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. S. Anders
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. J. Grifka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. F. X. Köck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Beckmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beckmann, J., Lüring, C., Tingart, M. et al. Cup positioning in THA: current status and pitfalls. A systematic evaluation of the literature. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129, 863–872 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-008-0686-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-008-0686-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation