Skip to main content
Log in

Impact magnitudes applied by surgeons and their importance when applying the femoral head onto the Morse taper for total hip arthroplasty

  • Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

This study was designed to test whether the number of impacts, the experience of the surgeon or impact force made significant difference in pull off forces.

Materials and methods

The forces applied by 10 orthopaedic surgeons (five residents and five attending staff) to impact the femoral head onto the trunnion of a femoral component were recorded. The resultant forces were then divided into four energy levels and compared to determine if the number of impacts would make a difference in pull off strength.

Results

No significant differences existed between the resident versus attending groups in magnitude of force applied. Through ANOVA testing, it was found that at each of the energy levels, multiple blows demonstrated a significant pull off strength difference compared to a single blow. Increased pull off force was also noted when the magnitude of force of the applied blows was increased.

Conclusion

We recommend at least two firm, axially aligned blows to impact the femoral head onto the trunnion intra-operatively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pennock AT, Schmidt AH, Bourgeault CA (2002) Morse-type tapers: factors that may influence taper strength during total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 17(6):773–778

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Shareef N, Levine D (1996) Effect of manufacturing tolerances on the micromotion at the Morse taper interface in modular hip implants interface in modular hip implants using the finite element technique. Biomaterials 17:623–630

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. ASTM (2000) Designation F2009–00 standard test method for determining the axial disassembly force of taper connections modular prostheses. 13(1):1484–1486

  4. Fuji Corporation; http://www.fujiprescale.com/html/fuji_prescale.html

  5. Abel Software Corporation; http://www.ablesw.com/3d-doctor/

  6. Collier JP, Mayor MB, Williams IR et al (1995) The tradeoffs associated with modular hip prostheses. Clin Orthop 311:91–101

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. McCarthy JC, Bono JV, O’Donnell PJ (1997) Custom and modular components in primary total hip replacement. Clin Orthop 344:162–171

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Collier JP, Surprenant VA, Jensen RE, Mayor MB (1991) Corrosion at the interface of cobalt-alloy heads on titanium-alloy stems. Clin Orthop 271:305–312

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Barrack RL, Burke DW, Cook SD et al (1993) Complications related to modularity of total hip components. J Bone Joint Surg BR 75:688–692

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pellicci PM, Haas SB (1990) Disassembly of a modular femoral component during closed reduction of the dislocated femoral component: a case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:619–620

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Woolson ST, Pottorff GT (1990) Disassembly of a modular femoral prosthesis after dislocation of the femoral component: a case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:624–625

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Chandrasekaran V, Sauer WL, Taylor AM, Hoeppner DW (1999) Evaluation of the fretting corrosion behavior of the proximal pad taper of a modular hip design. Wear 231:54–64

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Chu Y-H, Elias J, Duda G, Frassica F, Chao E (2000) Stress and micromotion in the taper lock joint of modular segmental bone replacement prosthesis. J Biomech 33:1175–1179

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Goldberg JR, Gilbert JL (2003) In vitro corrosion testing of modular hip tapers. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 64B:78–93

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Schmidt AH, Loch DA, Bechtold JE, Kyle RF (1997) Assessing Morse taper function: the relationship between impaction force, disassembly force, and design variables. In: Marlowe DE, Parr JE, Mayor MB (eds) Modularity of orthopaedic implants, ASTM STP 1301. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, p 114

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Akron General Medical Center for their financial support, and Smith and Nephew (Memphis, TN, USA) for donation of the implants.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jake P. Heiney.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heiney, J.P., Battula, S., Vrabec, G.A. et al. Impact magnitudes applied by surgeons and their importance when applying the femoral head onto the Morse taper for total hip arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129, 793–796 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-008-0660-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-008-0660-4

Keywords

Navigation