Abstract
Introduction
Whether to resurface the patella or not in total knee arthroplasty still remains undecided. Classical scores and questionnaires might not be responsive or demanding enough. This study used two accelerometer based systems to study the hypothesis whether performance based tests are able to detect a difference in patients with or without a resurfaced patella.
Method
In this retrospective study 53 patients were included and divided into a resurfaced group (n = 31) and a non-resurfaced group (n = 22). Both groups were matched on age and longevity of follow up. Patients were clinically assessed using the Knee Society Score (KSS) at various time points. At final follow up patients were also assessed once using the Dynaport® Knee Test and the Minimod® Gait Test.
Results
The Dynaport® Knee Test showed a significant functional advantage for patients with a resurfaced patella [44 vs. 39.7 (P = 0.042)], whereas KSS and The Minimod® were not significant (P values ranging from 0.07 to 0.75).
Similar to other reports in literature, using the KSS, it was not possible to identify significant difference between patella resurfacing or retaining in total knee arthroplasty, however using a performance based test it was possible to determine significant difference. The found advantage of patella resurfacing may be less due to pain relief but due to a functional benefit during demanding motion tasks. This finding indicates that current measurement tools may not be accurate or specific enough to detect this difference. Therefore, we recommend complementing the classic evaluation tools with an objective functional test, when conducting a randomized trial to answer the indecision whether to resurface the patella or not.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00402-008-0640-8/MediaObjects/402_2008_640_Fig1_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00402-008-0640-8/MediaObjects/402_2008_640_Fig2_HTML.gif)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Badhe N, Dewnany G, Livesley PJ (2001) Should the patella be replaced in total knee replacement? Int Orthop 25:97–99
Barrack RL (2003) Orthopaedic crossfire—All patellae should be resurfaced during primary total knee arthroplasty: in opposition. J Arthroplasty 18:35–38
Barrack RL, Bertot AJ, Wolfe MW, Waldman DA, Milicic M, Myers L (2001) Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, double-blind study with five to seven years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A:1376–1381
Bernstein J (1998) Resurfacing of the patella in total knee arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, double-blind study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80:925–926
Berti L, Benedetti MG, Ensini A, Catani F, Giannini S (2006) Clinical and biomechanical assessment of patella resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 21:610–616
Bourne RB, Burnett RS (2004) The consequences of not resurfacing the patella. Clin Orthop Relat Res 428:166–169
Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Vaz M, Kramer M, Hardie R, Robertson D (1995) Resurfacing versus not resurfacing the patella during total knee replacement. Clin Orthop 321:156–161
Braakman M, Verburg AD, Bronsema G, van Leeuwen WM, Eeftinck MP (1995) The outcome of three methods of patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 19:7–11
Burnett RS, Haydon CM, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB (2004) Patella resurfacing versus nonresurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: results of a randomized controlled clinical trial at a minimum of 10 years’ followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 428:12–25
Cameron HU, Fedorkow DM (1982) The patella in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 165:197–199
Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Colwell CE, Jr., Ranawat CS, Scott RD, Thornhill TS, Lapp MA (1998) In vivo anteroposterior femorotibial translation of total knee arthroplasty: a multicenter analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res:47–57
van den Dikkenberg N, Meijer OG, van der Slikke RM, van Lummel RC, van Dieen JH, Pijls B, Benink RJ, Wuisman PI (2002) Measuring functional abilities of patients with knee problems: rationale and construction of the DynaPort knee test. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 10:204–212
Enis JE (1993) Comparison of patellar resurfacing versus nonresurfacing in bilateral total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 288:310
Feller JA, Bartlett RJ, Lang DM (1996) Patellar resurfacing versus retention in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78:226–228
Hanssen AD (2003) Orthopaedic crossfire—All patellae should be resurfaced during primary total knee arthroplasty: in the affirmative. J Arthroplasty 18:31–34
Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN (1989) Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:13–14
Jacobs WC, Clement DJ, Wymenga AB (2005) Retention versus sacrifice of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee replacement for treatment of osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev:CD004803
Keblish PA, Varma AK, Greenwald AS (1994) Patellar resurfacing or retention in total knee arthroplasty. A prospective study of patients with bilateral replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76:930–937
Kleijn LL, van Hemert WL, Meijers WG, Kester AD, Lisowski L, Grimm B, Heyligers IC (2007) Functional improvement after unicompartmental knee replacement: a follow up study with a performance based knee test. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15(10):1187-1193
Kreibich DN, Vaz M, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Kim P, Hardie R, Kramer J, Kirkley A (1996) What is the best way of assessing outcome after total knee replacement? Clin Orthop Relat Res 331:221–225
Lehmann EL, D’Abrera HJM (1975) Nonparametrics. Statistical methods based on ranks. In: Holden-Day, San Francisco, pp 132–141
Maly MR, Costigan PA, Olney SJ (2006) Determinants of self-report outcome measures in people with knee osteoarthritis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 87:96–104
Mayman D, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Vaz M, Kramer J (2003) Resurfacing versus not resurfacing the patella in total knee arthroplasty: 8- to 10-year results. J Arthroplasty 18:541–545
Nizard RS, Biau D, Porcher R, Ravaud P, Bizot P, Hannouche D, Sedel L (2005) A meta-analysis of patellar replacement in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 432:196–203
Peng CW, Tay BK, Lee BP (2003) Prospective trial of resurfaced patellaversus non-resurfaced patella in simultaneous bilateral total knee replacement. Singapore Med J 44:347–351
Pollo FE, Jackson RW, Koeter S, Ansari S, Motley GS, Rathjen KW (2000) Walking, chair rising, and stair climbing after total knee arthroplasty: patellar resurfacing versus nonresurfacing. Am J Knee Surg 13:103–108 discussion 108–109
Schroeder-Boersch H, Scheller G, Synnatschke M, Arnold P, Jani L (1998) Patellar resurfacing. Results of a prospective randomized study. Orthopade 27:642–650
Shih HN, Shih LY, Wong YC, Hsu RW (2004) Long-term changes of the nonresurfaced patella after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A:935–939
Shoji H (1998) Resurfacing of the patella in total knee arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, double-blind study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80:926
Soudry M, Mestriner LA, Binazzi R, Insall JN (1986) Total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 205:166–170
Waters TS, Bentley G (2003) Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A:212–217
Wood DJ, Smith AJ, Collopy D, White B, Brankov B, Bulsara MK (2002) Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A:187–193
Yoshiya S, Matsui N, Komistek RD, Dennis DA, Mahfouz M, Kurosaka M (2005) In vivo kinematic comparison of posterior cruciate-retaining and posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasties under passive and weight-bearing conditions. J Arthroplasty 20:777–783
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have not received any financial support from third parties that could be of influence on this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
van Hemert, W.L., Senden, R., Grimm, B. et al. Patella retention versus replacement in total knee arthroplasty; functional and clinimetric aspects. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129, 259–265 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-008-0640-8
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-008-0640-8