Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Patella retention versus replacement in total knee arthroplasty; functional and clinimetric aspects

  • Orthopaedic Outcome Assessment
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Whether to resurface the patella or not in total knee arthroplasty still remains undecided. Classical scores and questionnaires might not be responsive or demanding enough. This study used two accelerometer based systems to study the hypothesis whether performance based tests are able to detect a difference in patients with or without a resurfaced patella.

Method

In this retrospective study 53 patients were included and divided into a resurfaced group (n = 31) and a non-resurfaced group (n = 22). Both groups were matched on age and longevity of follow up. Patients were clinically assessed using the Knee Society Score (KSS) at various time points. At final follow up patients were also assessed once using the Dynaport® Knee Test and the Minimod® Gait Test.

Results

The Dynaport® Knee Test showed a significant functional advantage for patients with a resurfaced patella [44 vs. 39.7 (P = 0.042)], whereas KSS and The Minimod® were not significant (P values ranging from 0.07 to 0.75).

Similar to other reports in literature, using the KSS, it was not possible to identify significant difference between patella resurfacing or retaining in total knee arthroplasty, however using a performance based test it was possible to determine significant difference. The found advantage of patella resurfacing may be less due to pain relief but due to a functional benefit during demanding motion tasks. This finding indicates that current measurement tools may not be accurate or specific enough to detect this difference. Therefore, we recommend complementing the classic evaluation tools with an objective functional test, when conducting a randomized trial to answer the indecision whether to resurface the patella or not.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Badhe N, Dewnany G, Livesley PJ (2001) Should the patella be replaced in total knee replacement? Int Orthop 25:97–99

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Barrack RL (2003) Orthopaedic crossfire—All patellae should be resurfaced during primary total knee arthroplasty: in opposition. J Arthroplasty 18:35–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Barrack RL, Bertot AJ, Wolfe MW, Waldman DA, Milicic M, Myers L (2001) Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, double-blind study with five to seven years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A:1376–1381

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bernstein J (1998) Resurfacing of the patella in total knee arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, double-blind study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80:925–926

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Berti L, Benedetti MG, Ensini A, Catani F, Giannini S (2006) Clinical and biomechanical assessment of patella resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 21:610–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bourne RB, Burnett RS (2004) The consequences of not resurfacing the patella. Clin Orthop Relat Res 428:166–169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Vaz M, Kramer M, Hardie R, Robertson D (1995) Resurfacing versus not resurfacing the patella during total knee replacement. Clin Orthop 321:156–161

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Braakman M, Verburg AD, Bronsema G, van Leeuwen WM, Eeftinck MP (1995) The outcome of three methods of patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 19:7–11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Burnett RS, Haydon CM, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB (2004) Patella resurfacing versus nonresurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: results of a randomized controlled clinical trial at a minimum of 10 years’ followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 428:12–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cameron HU, Fedorkow DM (1982) The patella in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 165:197–199

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Colwell CE, Jr., Ranawat CS, Scott RD, Thornhill TS, Lapp MA (1998) In vivo anteroposterior femorotibial translation of total knee arthroplasty: a multicenter analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res:47–57

  12. van den Dikkenberg N, Meijer OG, van der Slikke RM, van Lummel RC, van Dieen JH, Pijls B, Benink RJ, Wuisman PI (2002) Measuring functional abilities of patients with knee problems: rationale and construction of the DynaPort knee test. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 10:204–212

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Enis JE (1993) Comparison of patellar resurfacing versus nonresurfacing in bilateral total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 288:310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Feller JA, Bartlett RJ, Lang DM (1996) Patellar resurfacing versus retention in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78:226–228

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hanssen AD (2003) Orthopaedic crossfire—All patellae should be resurfaced during primary total knee arthroplasty: in the affirmative. J Arthroplasty 18:31–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN (1989) Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:13–14

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jacobs WC, Clement DJ, Wymenga AB (2005) Retention versus sacrifice of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee replacement for treatment of osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev:CD004803

  18. Keblish PA, Varma AK, Greenwald AS (1994) Patellar resurfacing or retention in total knee arthroplasty. A prospective study of patients with bilateral replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76:930–937

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kleijn LL, van Hemert WL, Meijers WG, Kester AD, Lisowski L, Grimm B, Heyligers IC (2007) Functional improvement after unicompartmental knee replacement: a follow up study with a performance based knee test. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15(10):1187-1193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kreibich DN, Vaz M, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Kim P, Hardie R, Kramer J, Kirkley A (1996) What is the best way of assessing outcome after total knee replacement? Clin Orthop Relat Res 331:221–225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lehmann EL, D’Abrera HJM (1975) Nonparametrics. Statistical methods based on ranks. In: Holden-Day, San Francisco, pp 132–141

  22. Maly MR, Costigan PA, Olney SJ (2006) Determinants of self-report outcome measures in people with knee osteoarthritis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 87:96–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mayman D, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Vaz M, Kramer J (2003) Resurfacing versus not resurfacing the patella in total knee arthroplasty: 8- to 10-year results. J Arthroplasty 18:541–545

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nizard RS, Biau D, Porcher R, Ravaud P, Bizot P, Hannouche D, Sedel L (2005) A meta-analysis of patellar replacement in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 432:196–203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Peng CW, Tay BK, Lee BP (2003) Prospective trial of resurfaced patellaversus non-resurfaced patella in simultaneous bilateral total knee replacement. Singapore Med J 44:347–351

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Pollo FE, Jackson RW, Koeter S, Ansari S, Motley GS, Rathjen KW (2000) Walking, chair rising, and stair climbing after total knee arthroplasty: patellar resurfacing versus nonresurfacing. Am J Knee Surg 13:103–108 discussion 108–109

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Schroeder-Boersch H, Scheller G, Synnatschke M, Arnold P, Jani L (1998) Patellar resurfacing. Results of a prospective randomized study. Orthopade 27:642–650

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Shih HN, Shih LY, Wong YC, Hsu RW (2004) Long-term changes of the nonresurfaced patella after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A:935–939

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Shoji H (1998) Resurfacing of the patella in total knee arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, double-blind study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80:926

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Soudry M, Mestriner LA, Binazzi R, Insall JN (1986) Total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 205:166–170

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Waters TS, Bentley G (2003) Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A:212–217

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Wood DJ, Smith AJ, Collopy D, White B, Brankov B, Bulsara MK (2002) Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A:187–193

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Yoshiya S, Matsui N, Komistek RD, Dennis DA, Mahfouz M, Kurosaka M (2005) In vivo kinematic comparison of posterior cruciate-retaining and posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasties under passive and weight-bearing conditions. J Arthroplasty 20:777–783

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have not received any financial support from third parties that could be of influence on this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wouter L. W. van Hemert.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Hemert, W.L., Senden, R., Grimm, B. et al. Patella retention versus replacement in total knee arthroplasty; functional and clinimetric aspects. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129, 259–265 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-008-0640-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-008-0640-8

Keywords

Navigation