Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Biomechanical and functional analysis of the pins and rubbers tractions system for treatment of proximal interphalangeal joint fracture dislocations

  • Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Dynamic external fixation systems are considered as optimal devices for treatment of fracture dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal joint (PiP). The pins and rubbers traction system (PRTS) is cheap, easy to assemble and comfortable and allows early mobilization of the affected digit. We investigated the influence of different wire positions and rubber strength and provided a follow-up of five consecutively treated patients.

Methods

Sixteen cadaver fingers (dig 2–5) were included into the biomechanical study. Forces for flexion of the PiP joint (30°, 60°, and 90°) were measured by pulling the flexor digitorum profundus tendon; width of the PiP joint was assessed radiologically. Measurements were obtained prior and after assembly of PRTS and were repeated with three different types of rubbers and two different positions of the retention wire (distal and proximal). The clinical part of the study included five patients (21–72 years) who were treated using the PRTS. Mean follow-up was 272 days.

Results

The PRTS increased flexion force of the PiP joint. Proximal position of the retention wire increased forces for 30° flexion. Different rubber strengths did neither increase PiP width nor influence flexion forces. In the clinical part of the study total range of motion was 74° and DASH score was 10.1. Pinch grip of the affected digit was 72% of the unaffected side.

Discussion

The PRTS allows for efficient treatment of intraarticular fractures with PiP involvement. Although standardized positioning of the wires is important, proximal position of the retraction only increased forces for 30° flexion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Figs. 3, 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Figs. 9–11 

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. van Onselen EB, Karim RB, Hage JJ, Ritt MJ (2003) Prevalence and distribution of hand fractures. J Hand Surg [Br] 28(5):491–495

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hastings H, Carroll C (1988) Treatment of closed articular fractures of the metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joints. Hand Clin 4(3):503–527

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Vidal J, Buscayret C, Connes H (1975) Treatment of articular fractures by ‘ligamentotaxis’ with external fixation. In: Brooker AF, Edwards CC (eds) External fixation—the current state of the art. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 75–81

  4. Allison DM (1996) Fractures of the base of the middle phalanx treated by a dynamic external fixation device. J Hand Surg [Br] 21(3):305–310

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Agee JM (1987) Unstable fracture dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal joint. Treatment with the force couple splint. Clin Orthop Relat Res (214):101–112

  6. Fahmy NR (1990) The stockport serpentine spring system for the treatment of displaced comminuted intra-articular phalangeal fractures. J Hand Surg [Br] 15(3):303–311

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hynes MC, Giddins GE (2001) Dynamic external fixation for pilon fractures of the interphalangeal joints. J Hand Surg [Br] 26(2):122–124

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Inanami H, Ninomiya S, Okutsu I, Tarui T (1993) Dynamic external finger fixator for fracture dislocation of the proximal interphalangeal joint. J Hand Surg [Am] 18(1):160–164

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Schenck RR (1986) Dynamic traction and early passive movement for fractures of the proximal interphalangeal joint. J Hand Surg [Am] 11(6):850–858

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Suzuki Y, Matsunaga T, Sato S, Yokoi T (1994) The pins and rubbers traction system for treatment of comminuted intraarticular fractures and fracture-dislocations in the hand. J Hand Surg [Br] 19(1):98–107

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bayer-Sandow T, Bruser P (2001) The dynamic treatment of intraarticular fractures of the base of the middle phalanx with the Suzuki dynamic fixator. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 33(4):267–270

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Duteille F, Pasquier P, Lim A, Dautel G (2003) Treatment of complex interphalangeal joint fractures with dynamic external traction: a series of 20 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 111(5):1623–1629

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Keramidas EG, Miller G (2005) The Suzuki frame for complex intraarticular fractures of the thumb. Plast Reconstr Surg 116(5):1326–1331

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Majumder S, Peck F, Watson JS, Lees VC (2003) Lessons learned from the management of complex intra-articular fractures at the base of the middle phalanges of fingers. J Hand Surg [Br.] 28(6):559–565

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Skoff HD (1997) A proximal interphalangeal joint fracture-dislocation treated by limited open (percutaneous) reduction and dynamic external fixation. Plast Reconstr Surg 99(2):587–589

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C (1996) Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) (corrected). The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med 29(6):602–608

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Germann G, Harth A, Wind G, Demir E (2003) Standardisation and validation of the German version 2.0 of the disability of arm, shoulder, hand (DASH) questionnaire. Unfallchirurg 106(1):13–19

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. McElfresh EC, Dobyns JH, O’Brien ET (1972) Management of fracture-dislocation of the proximal interphalangeal joints by extension-block splinting. J Bone Joint Surg Am 54(8):1705–1711

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Aladin A, Davis TR (2005) Dorsal fracture-dislocation of the proximal interphalangeal joint: a comparative study of percutaneous Kirschner wire fixation versus open reduction and internal fixation. J Hand Surg [Br] 30(2):120–128

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Del Pinal F, Garcia-Bernal FJ, Delgado J, Sanmartin M, Regalado J (2005) Results of osteotomy, open reduction, and internal fixation for late-presenting malunited intra-articular fractures of the base of the middle phalanx. J Hand Surg [Am] 30(5):1039–1039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kiefhaber TR, Stern PJ (1998) Fracture dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal joint. J Hand Surg [Am] 23(3):368–380

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Salter RB, Simmonds DF, Malcolm BW, Rumble EJ, MacMichael D, Clements ND (1980) The biological effect of continuous passive motion on the healing of full-thickness defects in articular cartilage. An experimental investigation in the rabbit. J Bone Joint Surg Am 62(8):1232–1251

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. De Soras X, De Mourgues P, Guinard D, Moutet F (1997) Pins and rubbers traction system. J Hand Surg [Br] 22(6):730–735

    Google Scholar 

  24. Slade JF, Gutow AP, Cohen M, Wolfe SW (1996) Can a distractor-fixator prevent dorsal subluxation of PiP fracture-dislocations? Orthop Trans 19(3):828

    Google Scholar 

  25. Long C 2nd, Conrad PW, Hall EA, Furler SL (1970) Intrinsic-extrinsic muscle control of the hand in power grip and precision handling. An electromyographic study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 52(5):853–867

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Brook N, Mizrahi J, Shoham M, Dayan J (1995) A biomechanical model of index finger dynamics. Med Eng Phys 17(1):54–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Arora R, Gschwentner M, Krappinger D, Lutz M, Blauth M, Gabl M (2007) Fixation of nondisplaced scaphoid fractures: making treatment cost effective. Prospective controlled trial. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 127(1):39–46

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Tohyama M, Miya S, Honda Y (2006) Trapezium fracture associated with occult fracture of the proximal pole of the scaphoid. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 126(1):70–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work contains parts of Eva Goldberg’s doctoral thesis. The authors would like to thank Juergen Kopp, MD for his help with the statistic analysis. We thank Professor Neuhuber, Department of Anatomy, University Erlangen for providing the cadavers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ulrich Kneser.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kneser, U., Goldberg, E., Polykandriotis, E. et al. Biomechanical and functional analysis of the pins and rubbers tractions system for treatment of proximal interphalangeal joint fracture dislocations. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129, 29–37 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-007-0526-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-007-0526-1

Keywords

Navigation