Skip to main content

Posterolateral lumbar spine fusion using a novel demineralized bone matrix: a controlled case pilot study

Abstract

Introduction

Intertransverse posterolateral fusion along with instrumentation is a common technique used for spinal fusion. Iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) offers good fusion success rates with a low risk for disease transmission but is, however, linked with certain morbidity. In an effort to eliminate or reduce the amount of iliac graft needed, bone substitutes including demineralized bone matrix (DBM) have been developed. This study evaluates a novel DBM (Accell Connexus®) used in one or two-level instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion.

Materials and methods

A total of 59 consecutive patients were studied as two groups. Group 1 consisted of 33 patients having Accell Connexus® used to augment either ICBG or local decompression material. Group 2 consisted of 26 consecutive patients, operated prior to the introduction of this novel DBM, having either ICBG alone or local decompression material. Fusion was assessed by two independent observers, blinded to graft material, using standardized criteria found in the literature. All adverse events were recorded prospectively.

Results

The results show no statistically significant differences between the two groups in fusion rates, complications, surgery duration, ODI, or pain on VAS. Logistical regression showed no relation between fusion and age, smoking status or comorbidities. Furthermore, no adverse events related to the use of the novel DBM were observed.

Conclusion

The results from this study demonstrate that the novel DBM presented performs equally as well as that of autologous bone, be it either ICBG or a local decompression material, and can therefore be used as a graft extender.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Boden SD (1998) Bone repair and enhancement clinical trial design. Spine applications. [Review] [48 refs]. Clin Orthop Relat Res 355(Suppl):S336–S346

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Boden SD (2002) Overview of the biology of lumbar spine fusion and principles for selecting a bone graft substitute. [Review] [68 refs]. Spine 27:S26–S31

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bostrom MP, Yang X, Kennan M, Sandhu H, Dicarlo E, Lane JM (2001) An unexpected outcome during testing of commercially available demineralized bone graft materials: how safe are the nonallograft components? [see comment]. Spine 26:1425–1428

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cammisa FP Jr, Lowery G, Garfin SR, Geisler FH, Klara PM, McGuire RA, Sassard WR, Stubbs H, Block JE (2004) Two-year fusion rate equivalency between Grafton DBM gel and autograft in posterolateral spine fusion: a prospective controlled trial employing a side-by-side comparison in the same patient. Spine 29:660–666

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Catinella FP, De Laria GA, De Wald RL (1990) False aneurysm of the superior gluteal artery. A complication of iliac crest bone grafting. Spine 15:1360–1362

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Christensen FB, Laursen M, Gelineck J, Eiskjaer SP, Thomsen K, Bunger CE (2001) Interobserver and intraobserver agreement of radiograph interpretation with and without pedicle screw implants: the need for a detailed classification system in posterolateral spinal fusion. Spine 26:538–543

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cohn BT, Krackow KA (1988) Fracture of the iliac crest following bone grafting. A case report. Orthopedics 11:473–474

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Escalas F, DeWald RL (1977) Combined traumatic arteriovenous fistula and ureteral injury: a complication of iliac bone-grafting. J Bone Joint Surg Am 59:270–271

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fernyhough JC, Schimandle JJ, Weigel MC, Edwards CC, Levine AM (1992) Chronic donor site pain complicating bone graft harvesting from the posterior iliac crest for spinal fusion. Spine 17:1474–1480

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Finkemeier CG (2002) Bone-grafting and bone-graft substitutes. [Review] [59 refs]. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A:454–464

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Friend KD, Koval KJ, Mirovsky Y, Remer SS, Bloom N, Neuwirth MG (1995) Fracture of the iliac crest following bone grafting: a case report and literature review. [Review] [8 refs]. Bull Hosp Joint Dis 54:49–51

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Girardi FP, Cammisa FP Jr (2003) The effect of bone graft extenders to enhance the performance of iliac crest bone grafts in instrumented lumbar spine fusion. Orthopedics 26:s545–s548

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Goulet JA, Senunas LE, DeSilva GL, Greenfield ML (1997) Autogenous iliac crest bone graft. Complications and functional assessment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 339:76–81

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hamad MM, Majeed SA (1989) Incisional hernia through iliac crest defects. A report of three cases with a review of the literature. [Review] [12 refs]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 108:383–385

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hu RW, Bohlman HH (1994) Fracture at the iliac bone graft harvest site after fusion of the spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 309:208–213

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Keller EE, Triplett WW (1987) Iliac bone grafting: review of 160 consecutive cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 45:11–14

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kurz LT, Garfin SR, Booth RE Jr (1989) Harvesting autogenous iliac bone grafts. A review of complications and techniques. Spine 14:1324–1331

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee KJ, Roper JG, Wang JC (2005) Demineralized bone matrix and spinal arthrodesis. [Review] [65 refs]. Spine J Off J North Am Spine Soc 5:217S–223S

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sassard WR, Eidman DK, Gray PM, Block JE, Russo R, Russell JL, Taboada EM (2000) Augmenting local bone with Grafton demineralized bone matrix for posterolateral lumbar spine fusion: avoiding second site autologous bone harvest. [see comment]. Orthopedics 23:1059–1064

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Silcox DH III, Boden SD, Schimandle JH, Johnson P, Whitesides TE, Hutton WC (1998) Reversing the inhibitory effect of nicotine on spinal fusion using an osteoinductive protein extract. Spine 23:291–296

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Thalgott JS, Giuffre JM, Fritts K, Timlin M, Klezl Z (2001) Instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion using coralline hydroxyapatite with or without demineralized bone matrix, as an adjunct to autologous bone. Spine J Off J North Am Spine Soc 1:131–137

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Urist MR (1965) Bone: formation by autoinduction. Science 150:893–899

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang JC, Kanim LE, Nagakawa IS, Yamane BH, Vinters HV, Dawson EG (2001) Dose-dependent toxicity of a commercially available demineralized bone matrix material. Spine 26:1429–1435

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by IsoTis OrthoBiologics Inc., Irvine, CA, USA, in the form of a nonprofit research fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Constantin Schizas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schizas, C., Triantafyllopoulos, D., Kosmopoulos, V. et al. Posterolateral lumbar spine fusion using a novel demineralized bone matrix: a controlled case pilot study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128, 621–625 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-007-0495-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-007-0495-4

Keywords

  • Demineralized bone matrix (DBM)
  • Spinal fusion
  • Bone grafting
  • Safety
  • Efficacy