Skip to main content
Log in

Mid-term results of total knee arthroplasty after high tibial osteotomy

  • Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The outcome of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) after high tibial osteotomy (HTO) is still controversial. In order to determine if osteotomy has any effect on this outcome we performed a medium-term review of a cohort of patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Materials and methods

Thirty-two patients (38 knees), who were treated with a HTO before the TKA during the last 8 years, were compared with a matched group who underwent primary TKA. The knees were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively according to the scoring systems of the Knee Society and Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS). The anteroposterior tibiofemoral alignment, the Insall–Salvati patellar position ratio, range-of-motion and the location of the lateral joint line, were also recorded. The patients were reviewed with a mean follow-up of 4.5 years after TKA.

Results

The preoperative and postoperative knee scores had no statistically significant differences between the two groups. So was the case with the intraoperative releases, blood loss, thromboembolic or neurologic complications and infection rates in either group. Access to perform the arthroplasty was reportedly more difficult and took an average of 25 min longer. A significant difference (p < 0.05) was detected in terms of impingement of the tibial stem on the lateral tibial cortex, patellar subluxation and patella baja between the two groups but this did not have any influence on the outcome of the prosthesis. Knee alignment and stability so as range of motion (ROM) measurements were also found with no statistical significance.

Conclusion

Although we did manage to detect statistically significant differences mainly in radiographic results between the two groups, this situation did not appear to influence the clinical outcome of the patients, however. The fact that most of the patients had good or excellent results at an average follow-up of 4.5 years suggests that HTO does not have a significant negative effect on later TKA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Insall JN, Joseph DM, Msika C (1984) High tibial osteotomy for varus gonarthrosis: a long-term follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66(7):1040–1048

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Odenbring S, Egund N, Knutson K, Lindstrand A, Larsen ST (1990) Revision after osteotomy for gonarthrosis: a 10–19 year follow-up of 314 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 61(2):128–130

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Nagel A, Insall JN, Scuderi GR (1996) Proximal tibial osteotomy: a subjective outcome study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78(9):1353–1358

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bettin D, Karbowski A, Schwering L, Matthiass HH (1998) Time-dependent clinical and roentgenographical results of Coventry high tibial valgisation osteotomy. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 117(1–2):53–57

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Katz MM, Hungerford DS, Krackow KA, Lennox DW (1987) Results of total knee arthroplasty after failed proximal tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69(2):225–233

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Windsor RE, Insall JN, Vince KG (1988) Technical considerations of total knee arthroplasty after proximal tibial osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 70(4):547–555

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rorabeck CH, Smith PN (1998) Results of revision total knee arthroplasty in the face of significant bone deficiency. Orthop Clin North Am 29(2):361–371

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Staeheli JW, Cass JR, Morrey BF (1987) Condylar knee arthroplasty after failed proximal tibial osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69(1):28–31

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Neyret P, Deroche P, Deschamps G, Dejour H (1992) Prothese totale du genou apres osteotomie tibiale de valgisation. Rev Chir Orthop 78(7):438–448

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bergenudd H, Sahlstrom A, Sanzen L (1997) Total knee arthroplasty after failed proximal tibial valgus osteotomy. J Arthroplasty 12(6):635–638

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gill T, Schemitsch EH, Brick GW, Thornhill TS (1995) Revision total knee arthroplasty after failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty or high tibial osteotomy. Clin Orthop 321:10–18

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mont MA, Antonaides S, Krackow KA, Hungerford DS (1994) Total knee arthroplasty after failed high tibial osteotomy: a comparison with a matched group. Clin Orthop 299:125–130

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ries MD, Richman JA (1996) Extended tibial tubercle osteotomy in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 11(8):964–967

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Takai S, Yoshino N, Hirasawa Y (1997) Revision total knee arthroplasty after failed high tibial osteotomy. Bull Hosp Joint Dis 56(4):245–250

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Masri BA, Campbell DG, Garbuz DS, Duncan CP (1998) Seven specialized exposures for revision hip and knee replacement. Orthop Clin North Am 29(2):229–240

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Whiteside LA (1997) Surgical exposure in revision total knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 46:221–225

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Insall NJ, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN (1989) Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop 248:13–14

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Insall NJ, Ranawat CS, Aglietti P, Shine J (1976) A comparison of four models of total knee replacement prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 58:754

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Insall NJ, Salvati E (1971) Patella position in the normal knee joint. Radiology 101:101–104

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mont MA, Alexander N, Krackow KA, Hungerford DS (1994) Total knee arthroplasty after failed high tibial osteotomy. Orthop Clin North Am 25:515–525

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Cameron HU, Park YS (1996) Total knee replacement following high tibial osteotomy and unicompartmental knee. Orthopedics 19(9):807–808

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Toksvig-Larsen S, Magyar G, Onsten I, Ryd L, Lindstrand (1998) A fixation of the tibial component of total knee arthroplasty after high tibial osteotomy: a matched radiostereometric study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80(2):295–297

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Amendola A, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB, Apyan PM (1989) Total knee arthroplasty following high tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty 4(suppl):S11–S17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nizard RS, Cardinne L, Bizot P, Witvoet J (1998) Total knee replacement after failed tibial osteotomy: results of a matched-pair study. J Arthroplasty 13(8):847–853

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Scuderi GR, Windsor RE, Insall JN (1989) Observations on patellar height after proximal tibial osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 71(2):245–247

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Cameron HU, Welsh RP (1988) Potential complications of total knee replacement following tibial osteotomy. Orthop Rev 17(1):39–43

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Krackow KA, Holtgrewe JL (1990) Experience with a new technique for managing severely overcorrected valgus high tibial osteotomy at total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 258:213–224

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Konstantinos J. Kazakos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kazakos, K.J., Chatzipapas, C., Verettas, D. et al. Mid-term results of total knee arthroplasty after high tibial osteotomy. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128, 167–173 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-007-0488-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-007-0488-3

Keywords

Navigation