Abstract
Introduction
Some of the systems marketed for pulsatile high-pressure lavage are clearly different in their mechanical pulse characteristics. To take the matter further we set up an experimental in vitro model to determine whether these different lavage systems might produce different cementation results because of their differing pulse characteristics, and whether the systems differed significantly in terms of cement depth penetration.
Materials and methods
A total of 48 femoral heads were obtained at operation from patients who had undergone endoprosthetic hip replacement. The specimens were subjected to manual rinsing or semiautomatic cleansing procedures with five different pulsatile lavage devices. After the cleansing procedures, polymethylmetacrylate bone cement was intruded into the cancellous bone under standardised conditions. Determination of cement penetration was done by computed tomography using an image processing software.
Results
Irrespective of the nature of the lavage system tested, superficial cement penetration, both up to 2 mm and up to 3 mm, was significantly better after pulsatile high-pressure lavage than it was after manual rinsing of the specimens with a bladder syringe (P < 0.001 in each case). Whereas our experimental model did not show any significant differences between the lavage systems as regards the cementation results to a depth of up to 2 mm (P = 0.996), there were significant differences at a target depth of 3 mm (P < 0.05).
Conclusion
As compared with manual rinsing, pulsatile high-pressure lavage in vitro makes highly significant improvements in cement penetration into cancellous bone and should be regarded as an indispensable component of modern cementation techniques for endoprosthetic surgery. Up to the present we have not been able to ascertain what influence the different pulse characteristics of a pulsatile lavage system may have on the intended cementation result, whether it is impact force, pulse shape, pulse duration, flow rate or frequency. Appropriate investigations will be necessary.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alho A, Lepisto J, Ylinen P, Paavilainen T (2000) Cemented Lubinus and Furlog total hip endoprosthesis: a 12-year follow-up study of 175 hips comparing the cementing technique. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 120:276–280
Anthony PP, Gie GA, Howie CR, Ling RS (1990) Localised endosteal bone lysis in relation to the femoral components of cemented total hip arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg 72B:971–979
Ballard WT, Callaghan JJ, Sullivan PM, Johnston RC (1994) The results of improved cementing techniques for total hip arthroplasty in patients less than fifty years old. A ten-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg 76A:959–964
Barrack RL, Mulroy RD, Harris WH (1992) Improved cementing techniques and femoral component loosening in young patients with hip arthroplasty. A 12-year radiographic review. J Bone Joint Surg 74B:385–389
Breusch SJ, Norman TL, Schneider U, Reitzel T, Blaha JD, Lukoschek M (2000) Lavage technique in total hip arthroplasty: jet lavage produces better cement penetration than syringe lavage in the proximal femur. J Arthroplasty 15:921–927
Breusch SJ, Schneider U, Kreutzer J, Ewerbeck V, Lukoschek M (2000) Effects of the cementing technique on cementing results concerning the coxal end of the femur. Orthopade 29:260–270
Breusch SJ, Schneider U, Reitzel T, Kreutzer J, Ewerbeck V, Lukoschek M (2001) Significance of jet lavage for in vitro and in vivo cement penetration. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 139:52–63
Ebramzadeh E, Sarmiento A, McKellop HA, Llinas A, Gogan W (1994) The cement mantle in total hip arthroplasty. Analysis of long-term radiographic results. J Bone Joint Surg 76A:77–87
Halawa M, Lee AJC, Ling RSM, Vangala SS (1978) The shear strength of trabecular bone from the femur, and some factors affecting the shear strength of the cement-bone interface. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 92:19–30
Huiskes R (1980) Some fundamental aspects of human joint replacement. Analyses of stresses and heat conduction in bone-prosthesis structures. Acta Orthop Scand 185(Suppl):1–208
Jasty MJ, Floyd WE, Schiller AL, Goldring SR, Harris WH (1986) Localised osteolysis in stable, non septic total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 68A:912–919
Kawate K, Maloney WJ, Bragdon CR, Biggs SA, Jasty M, Harris WH (1998) Importance of a thin cement mantle. Autopsy studies of eight hips. Clin Orthop Relat Res 355:70–76
Krause WR, Krug W, Miller J (1982) Strength of the cement-bone interface. Clin Orthop Relat Res 163:290–299
MacDonald W, Swarts E, Beaver R (1993) Penetration and shear strength of cement-bone interfaces in vivo. Clin Orthop Relat Res 286:283–288
Madey SM, Callaghan JJ, Olejniczak JP, Goetz DD, Johnston RC (1997) Charnley total hip arthroplasty with use of improved techniques of cementing. J Bone Joint Surg 79A: 53–64
Maistrelli GL, Antonelli L, Fomasier V, Mohamed N (1995) Cement penetration with pulsed lavage versus syringe irrigation in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 312:261–265
Majkowski RS, Miles AW, Bannister GC, Perkins J, Taylor GJ (1993) Bone surface preparation in cemented joint replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 75B:459–463
Morgan J, Holder G, Desoutter G (2003) The measurement and comparison of jet characteristics of surgical pulse lavage devices. J Arthroplasty 18:45–50
Oates KM, Barrera DL, Tucker WN, Chau CC, Bugbee WD, Convery FR (1995) In vivo effect of pressurization of polymethyl methacrylate bone–cement. Biomechanical and histologic analysis. J Arthroplasty 10:373–381
Paul HA, Bargar WL (1986) Histologic changes in the dog femur following total hip replacement with current cementing techniques. J Arthroplasty 1:5–9
Pitto RP, Koessler M, Draenert K (1998) The John Charnley Award. Prophylaxis of fat and bone marrow embolism in cemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 355:23–34
Schmalzried TP, Kwong LM, Jasty M, Sedlacek RC, Haire TC, O´Connor DO, Bragdon CR, Kabo JM, Malcolm AJ, Harris WH (1992) The mechanisms of loosening of cemented acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty. Analysis of specimens retrieved at autopsy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 274:60–78
Sih GC, Connelly GM, Berman AT (1980) The effect of thickness and pressure on the curing of PMMA bone cement for the total hip joint replacement. J Biomech 13:347–352
Star MJ, Colwell CW, Kelman GJ, Ballock RT, Walker RH (1994) Suboptimal (thin) distal cement mantel thickness as a contributory factor in total hip arthroplasty femoral component failure. A retrospective radiographic analysis favoring distal stem centralization. J Arthroplasty 9:143–149
Willert HG, Ludwig J, Semlitsch M (1974) Reaction of bone to methacrylate after hip arthroplasty: a long-term gross, light microscopic, and scanning electron microscopic study. J Bone Joint Surg 56A:1368–1382
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kalteis, T., Pförringer, D., Herold, T. et al. An experimental comparison of different devices for pulsatile high-pressure lavage and their relevance to cement intrusion into cancellous bone. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 127, 873–877 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-007-0418-4
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-007-0418-4