Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The effectiveness of the external distal aiming device in intramedullary fixation of tibial shaft fractures

  • Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Intramedullary nailing has become a popular and effective procedure for the treatment of most fractures of the tibial diaphysis. However, distal interlocking screw placement under fluoroscopic control is responsible for the majority of the radiation exposure and a significant loss of surgical time in the entire nailing procedure. To limit fluoroscopy use, during distal interlocking screw placement, Orthofix® has developed a distal targeting device which compensates for the inevitable deformation of the nail in the sagittal plane during its insertion. This prospective clinical study evaluates the efficacy of this distal targeting device for distal locking.

Materials and methods

One hundred and fifteen fresh tibial fractures in the same number of patients with a mean age of 37.5 years (17–85 years) were treated with operative stabilization using the Orthofix tibial nailing system.

Results

The mean duration of the operation was 38 min (20–55 min). A mean of four intra-operative plain X-rays (2–6 X-rays) were used in 103 cases to confirm guide wire placement, final nail insertion and accuracy of screws placement. The mean duration of the use of the image intensifier utilized in the remaining 12 fractures was 5 s (3–8 s). The distal targeting device failed in 12 (5.2%) distal locking screws.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that distal locking can be performed easily and successfully with minimal exposure to radiation, once the surgeon develops a reasonable experience with the use of this distal targeting device.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abdlslam KM, Bonnaire F (2003) Experimental model for a new distal locking aiming device for solid intramedullary tibial nails. Injury 34:363–366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Barry TP (1984) Radiation exposure to an orthopedic surgeon. Clin Orthop Relat Res 182:160–164

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bhandari M, Guyatt GH, Khera V et al (2003) Operative management of lower extremity fractures in patients with head injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 407:187–198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Blachut PA, O’Brien PJ, Meek RN, Broekhuyse HM (1997) Interlocking intramedullary nailing with and without reaming for the treatment of closed fractures of the tibial shaft A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg 79A(5):640–646

    Google Scholar 

  5. Court-Brown CM, Cristie J, Mc Qeen MM (1990) Closed intramedullary tibial nailing, its use in closed and type I open fractures. J Bone Joint Surg 72B:605–611

    Google Scholar 

  6. Drosos GI, Bishay M, Karnezis IA, Alegakis AK (2006) Factors affecting fracture healing after intramedullary nailing of the tibial diaphysis for closed and grade I open fractures. J Bone Joint Surg 88B(2):227–231

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gugala Z, Nana A, Lindsey RW (2001) Tibial intramedullary nail distal interlocking screw placement: comparison of the free-hand versus distally based targeting device techniques. Injury 32(S-D):21–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gustillo RB, Anderson JT (1976) Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty five open fractures of long bones, retrospective and prospective analysis. J Bone Joint Surg 58A:453–458

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hudson I (1989) Locking nailing: an aid to distal targeting. Injury 20(3):129–130

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Karachalios T, Babis G, Tsarouchas J et al (2000) The clinical performance of a small diameter tibial nailing system with a mechanical distal aiming device. Injury 31:451–459

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Karladani AH, Granhed H, Edshage B et al (2000) Displaced tibial shaft fractures: a prospective randomized study of closed intramedullary nailing versus cast treatment in 53 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 71(2):160–167

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kelley SS, Bonar S, Hussamy OD, Morrison JA (1995) A simple technique for insertion of distal screws into interlocking nails. J Orthop Trauma 9(3):227–230

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Krettek C, Konemann B, Mannes J et al (1996) Analysis of implantation-induced nail deformation and roentgen morphometric studies as the principle for an aiming device for distal interlocking nailing without roentgen image intensification. Unfallchirurg 99(9):671–678

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Krettek C, Mannb J, Konemann B et al (1997) The deformation of small diameter solid tibial nails with unreamed intramedullary insertion. J Biomech 30(4):391–394

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Krettek C, Konemann B, Miclau T et al (1997) A new technique for the distal locking of solid AO unreamed tibial nails. J Orthop Trauma 11(6):446–451

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Krettek C, Mannb J, Miclau T et al (1998) Deformation of femoral nails with intramedullary insertion. J Orthop Res 16(5):572–575

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Krettek C, Konemann B, Farouk O et al (1998) Experimental study of distal interlocking of a solid tibial nail: radiation-independent distal aiming device (DAD) versus freehand technique (FHT). J Orthop Trauma 12(6):373–378

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Krettek C, Konemann B, Miclau T et al (1998) A new mechanical aiming device for the placement of distal interlocking screws in femoral nails. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 117(3):147–152

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Krettek C, Konemann B, Miclau T et al (1999) A mechanical distal aiming device for distal locking in femoral nails. Clin Orthop Relat Res 364:267–275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Levin PE, Schoen RW, Browner BD (1987) Radiation exposure to the surgeon during closed interlocking intramedullary nailing. J Bone Joint Surg 69A(5):761–766

    Google Scholar 

  21. Madan S, Blakeway C (2002) Radiation exposure to surgeon and patient in intramedullary nailing of the lower limb. Injury 33:723–727

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mehlman CT, DiPasquale TG (1997) Radiation exposure to the orthopaedic surgical team during fluoroscopy: “how far away is far enough?”. J Orthop Trauma 11(6):392–398

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Miller ME, Davis ML, MacClean CR et al (1983) Radiation exposure and associated risks to operating-room personnel during use of fluoroscopic guidance for selected orthopaedic surgical procedures. J Bone Joint Surg 65A(1):1–4

    Google Scholar 

  24. Muller ME, Nazarian S, Koch P, Schatzker J (1990) The comprehensive classification of fractures of long bones. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  25. Muller LP, Suffner J, Wenda K et al (1998) Radiation exposure to the hands and the thyroid of the surgeon during intramedullary nailing. Injury 29(6):461–468

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Obremskey WT, Medina M (2004) Comparison of intramedullary nailing of distal third tibial shaft fractures: before and after traumatologists. Orthopedics 27:1180–1184

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Pardiwala D, Prabhu V, Dudhniwala G, Katre R (2001) The AO distal locking aiming device: an evaluation of efficacy and learning curve. Injury 32:713–718

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Penning D, Oppenheim W, Faccioli G, Rossi S (1997) Intramedullary locked nailing of femur and tibia: insertion of distal locking screws without image intensifier. Injury 28:323–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Riley SA (1989) Radiation exposure from fluoroscopy during orthopedic surgical procedures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:257–260

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sanders R, Koval KJ, DiPasquale T et al (1993) Exposure of the orthopaedic surgeon to radiation. J Bone Joint Surg 75A(3):326–330

    Google Scholar 

  31. Skjeldal S, Backe S (1987) Interlocking medullary nails-radiation doses in distal targeting. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 106(3):179–181

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Sugarman ID, Adam I, Bunker TD (1988) Radiation dosage during AO locking femoral nailing. Injury 19(5):336–338

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Watson T (1994) Treatment of unstable fractures of the shaft of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg 76A:1575–1584

    Google Scholar 

  34. Weller S (1993) Internal fixation of fractures by intramedullary nailing Introduction, historical review and present status. Injury 24(S3):1–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Whatling GM, Nokes LDM (2006) Literature review of current techniques for the insertion of distal screws into intramedullary locking nails. Injury 37(2):109–119

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Whittle AP, Russel TA, Taylor JC, La Velle DG (1992) Treatment of open fractures of the tibial shaft with the use of interlocking nailing without reaming. J Bone Joint Surg 74A:1162–1171

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George C. Babis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Babis, G.C., Benetos, I.S., Zoubos, A.B. et al. The effectiveness of the external distal aiming device in intramedullary fixation of tibial shaft fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 127, 905–908 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-007-0405-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-007-0405-9

Keywords

Navigation