Skip to main content

The clinical significance of impaction at the femoral neck fracture site in the elderly

Abstract

Introduction

Factors influencing clinical outcomes of osteosynthesis for elderly patients with Garden stage I and II femoral neck fractures are not well understood.

Materials and methods

To determine the factors influencing the clinical outcomes of in situ osteosynthesis in non-displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly, radiographs and clinical data of patients were retrospectively analyzed. The subjects were 49 patients with femoral neck fractures (Garden stages I and II), who underwent osteosynthesis, with correctly inserted screws and with more than 2 years of follow up. The relationships between preoperative anteroposterior X-ray parameters including Garden stage, the presence or absence of spikes, the Singh grade, the Garden alignment index, the degree of impaction at the fracture site (the capital impaction index) and postoperative outcomes were analyzed.

Results

Among the 49 cases, there were eight unsuccessfully treated patients, two with non-union and six with late segmental collapse. The “without spikes” fracture type (P < 0.05) and the degree of capital impaction when the capital impaction index (P < 0.0001) was greater than the mean plus the standard deviation, were significantly associated with unsuccessful outcomes.

Conclusion

Excessive shortening at the fracture site on the anteroposterior radiograph in the femoral neck fracture of Garden stages I and II can be used to predict poor outcomes from in situ osteosynthesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Alberts KA, Jervaeus J (1990) Factors predisposing to healing complications after internal fixation of femoral neck fracture. A stepwise logistic regression analysis. Clin Orthop 157:129–133

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alho A, Benterud JG, Ronningen H, Hoiseth A (1992) Prediction of disturbed healing in femoral neck fracture. Radiographic analysis of 149 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 63(6):639–644

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Alho A, Benterud JG, Ronningen H, Hoiseth A (1991) Radiographic prediction of early failure in femoral neck fracture. Acta Orthop Scand 62(5):422–426

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bentry G (1980) Treatment of nondisplaced fractures of the femoral neck. Clin Orthop 152:93–101

    Google Scholar 

  5. Calandruccio RA, Anderson WE (1980) Post-fracture avascular necrosis of the femoral head: correlation of experimental and clinical studies. Clin Orthop 152:49–84

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Edgren W (1965) Coxa plana. A clinical and radiological investigation with particular reference to the importance of the metaphyseal changes for the final shape of the proximal part of the femur. Acta Orthop Scand 84 suppl:94–101

    Google Scholar 

  7. Garden RS (1961) Low-angle fixation in fractures of the femoral neck. J Bone Joint Surg 48B:647–663

    Google Scholar 

  8. Garden RS (1971) Malreduction and avascular necrosis in subcapital fractures of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg 53B:183–197

    Google Scholar 

  9. Heetveld MJ, Raaymakers ELFB, Walsum ADP et al (2005) Observer assessment of femoral neck radiographs after reduction and dynamic hip screw fixation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 125:160–165

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Itadera E, Ichikawa N, Yamanaka N, Ohmori T, Hashizume H (2003) Femoral neck fractures in older patients: indication for osteosynthesis. J Orthop Sci 8:155–159

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee KBL, Howe TS, Chang HC (2004) Cancellous screw fixation for femoral neck fractures: one hundred and sixteen patients. Ann Acad Med Singapore 33:248–251

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Leitch JM, Paterson DC, Foster BK (1991) Growth disturbance in Legg–Calve–Perthes disease and consequences of surgical treatment. Clin Orthop 262:178–184

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lindequist S, Tornkvist H (1995) Quality of reduction and cortical screw support in femoral neck fractures. An analysis of 72 fractures with a new computerized measuring method. J Orthop Trauma 9:215–221

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Madsen F, Linde F, Andersen B et al (1987) Fixation of displaced femoral neck fractures. A comparison between sliding screw plate and four cancellous bone screws. Acta Orthop Scand 58:212–216

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mathiesen T, Zayer M (1989) A prognostic algorithm for assessment of subcapital femoral neck fractures. Acta Radiologica 30:639–642

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nikolopoulos KE, Papadakis SA, Kateros KT et al (2003) Long-term outcome of patients with avascular necrosis, after internal fixation of femoral neck fracture. Injury 34:525–528

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Nilsson LT, Johansson A, Stromqvist B (1993) Factors predicting healing complications in femoral neck fractures. 138 patients followed for 2 years. Acta Orthop Scand 64:175–177

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nurmi I, Narinen A, Luthje P, Tanninen S (2003) Cost analysis of hip fracture treatment among the elderly for the public health service. A 1-year prospective study in 106 consecutive patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 123:551–554

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Parker MJ, Blundell C (1998) Choice of implant for internal fixation of femoral neck fractures. Acta Orthop Scand 69:138–143

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Raaymakers ELFB (2002) The non-operative treatment of impacted femoral neck fractures. Injury 33(suppl 3):8–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rodriguez-Merchan EC (2002) In situ fixation of nondisplaced intracapsular fractures of the proximal femur. Clin Orthop 399:42–51

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rodriguez-Merchan EC (2002) Displaced intracapsular hip fractures: hemiarthroplasty or total arthroplasty? Clin Orthop 399:72–77

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rogmark C, Carlsson A, Johnell O, Sernbo I (2002) A prospective randomized trial of internal fixation versus arthroplasty for displaced fractures of the neck of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg 84B:183–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Saito N, Miyasaka T, Toriumi H (1995) Radiographic factors predicting non-union of displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 114:183–187

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Schep NW, Heintjes RJ, Martens EP et al (2004) Retrospective analysis of factors influencing the operative result after percutaneous osteosynthesis of intracapsular femoral neck fractures. Injury 35:1003–1009

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Singh M, Nagrath AR, Maini PS (1970) Changes in trabecular pattern of the upper end of the femur as an index of osteoporosis. J Bone Joint Surg 52A:457–467

    Google Scholar 

  27. Swiontkowski MF, Hansen ST (1986) Percutaneous Neufeld pinning for femoral neck fractures. Clin Orthop 206:113–116

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Yamamoto M, Minamisawa I, Morita M (1981) Fracture type, mechanism and modified Garden’s analysis on the senile intracapsular fracture of the femoral neck. Orthopedic Surgery 32:339–347 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kei Miyamoto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shimizu, T., Miyamoto, K., Masuda, K. et al. The clinical significance of impaction at the femoral neck fracture site in the elderly. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 127, 515–521 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-007-0358-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-007-0358-z

Keywords

  • Femoral neck fracture
  • Osteosynthesis
  • Osteoporosis
  • Elderly
  • Outcome