Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Arthroscopic implantation of a three dimensional scaffold for autologous chondrocyte transplantation

  • Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The arthroscopic M-ACT technique is applicable for defects at the femoral condyle up to 5 cm². The size of the defect has to be assessed with a specific scaled, percutaneously inserted needle. Then an 8 mm water-stop-cannula is positioned in a suprameniscal portal. The chondrocyte seeded matrix is trimmed to size the defect. The scaffold is introduced in the joint through the cannula and placed into the defect with a blunt arthroscopic grasp instrument to prevent damage of the scaffold. Then a specific drill guide is inserted through an additional anteromedial portal to place it on the scaffold in a perpendicular angle. The position of the drill guide should not be changed during the next two steps. It may be helpful to hold the matrix in place with a probe inserted through the cannula. A 1.5 mm K-wire is drilled at least 16 mm into the subchondral bone. Then the biodegradable pin (length 16 mm) is placed in the drill guide and carefully hammered into the subchondral bone. The joint is flexed so that the drill guide can be placed on the posterior end of the scaffold. Another hole is drilled with the K-wire and a second pin is inserted. Finally the stability of the matrix is tested with a probe and the joint is mobilized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bartlett W, Skinner JA, Gooding CR (2005) Autologous chondrocyte implantation versus matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation for osteochondral defects of the knee: a prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87(5):640–645

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Brittberg M, Lindahl A, Nilsson A, Ohlsson C, Isaksson O, Peterson L (1994) Treatment of deep cartilage defects in the knee with autologous chondrocyte transplantation. N Engl J Med 331:889–895

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Erggelet C, Sittinger M, Lahm A (2003) The arthroscopic implantation of autologous chondrocytes for the treatment of full-thickness cartilage defects of the knee joint. Arthroscopy 19(1):108–110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Marcacci M, Zaffagnini S, Kon E, Visani A, Iancono F, Loreti I (2002) Arthroscopic autologous chondrocyte transplantation: technical note. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 10(3):154–159

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Perka C, Sittinger M, Schultz O, Spitzer RS, Schlenzka D, Burmester GR (2000) Tissue engineered cartilage repair using cryopreserved and noncryopreserved chondrocytes. Clin Orthop 378:245–254

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Peterson L, Minas T, Brittberg M, Nilsson A, Sjogren-Jansson E, Lindahl A (2000) Two- to 9-year outcome after autologous chondrocyte transplantation of the knee. Clin Orthop 374:212–234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sittinger M, Reitzel D, Dauner M (1996) Resorbable polyesters in cartilage engineering: affinity and biocompatibility of polymer fiber structures to chondrocytes. J Biomed Mater Res 33:57–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Steinwachs M, Kreuz PC (2007) Autologous chondrocyte implantation in chondral defects of the knee with a type I/III collagen membrane: a prospective study with a 3-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 23(4):381–387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gooding CR, Bartlett W, Bentley G, Skinner JA, Carrington R, Flanagan A (2006) A prospective, randomised study comparing two techniques of autologous chondrocyte implantation for osteochondral defects in the knee: Periosteum covered versus type I/III collagen covered. Knee 13(3):203–210

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hunziker EB (2002) Articular cartilage repair: basic science and clinical progress. A review of the current status and prospects. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 10:432–463

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Zelle S, Zantop T, Schanz St, Raschke MJ, Petersen W (2007) Arthroscopic Techniques for the Fixation of a three dimensional Scaffold for Autologous Chondrocyte Transplantation: Structural properties in an in vitro model. Arthroscopy under review

  12. Martinek V, Friedrich NF (1999) Tibial and pretibial cyst formation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bioabsorbable interference screw fixation. Arthroscopy 15(3):317–320

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Weiler A, Hoffmann RF, Stahelin AC, Helling HJ, Sudkamp NP (2000) Biodegradable implants in sports medicine: the biological base. Arthroscopy 16(3):305–321

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thore Zantop.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Petersen, W., Zelle, S. & Zantop, T. Arthroscopic implantation of a three dimensional scaffold for autologous chondrocyte transplantation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128, 505–508 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-007-0348-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-007-0348-1

Keywords

Navigation