Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Discography: can pain in a morphologically normal disc be due to an adjacent abnormal disc?

  • Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Symptomatic patients who had Magnetic Resonance Imaging findings of degenerative disc disease and who failed conservative treatment were identified. As a preoperative test, these patients underwent discography. The patients, who experienced pain with injection into a morphologically normal disc adjacent to a morphologically abnormal disc, were included in the study. These patients subsequently had repeat discograms, during which the adjacent abnormal disc was first anesthetized with 2% lidocaine and the discogram was repeated at the adjacent normal level. All patients were blinded as to the nature of the procedure. Nine patients were identified (7 males and 2 females). The average age was 46.5 years (32–68). Two patients had a previous L4-Sacrum anterior and posterior fusion while 2 patients had L5-Sacrum anterior and posterior fusions. These four patients had solid fusions on Computerized Tomography scan and had developed adjacent segment degeneration according to MRI. Overall, each patient underwent an average of four discograms, at the lowest mobile disc segments. All of the patients were found to have a painful but morphologically normal disc adjacent to a painful and morphologically abnormal disc. The morphologically abnormal disc was anesthetized and the discography repeated on the normal disc. Upon this repeat discography, none of the patients experience any pain. The authors recommend anesthetizing painful abnormal discs prior to discography of the adjacent discs. This technique may avoid unnecessary dismissal of patients from treatment because of an appropriate response to discography. The normal disc may be due to referred pain from an adjacent abnormal disc.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schneiderman G, Flannigan B, Kingston S, Thomas J, Dillin WH, Watkins RG (1987) Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of disc degeneration: correlation with discography. Spine 12(3):276–281

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gibson MJ, Buckley J, Mawhinney R, Mulholland RC, Worthington BS 1986 Magnetic resonance imaging and discography in the diagnosis of disc degeneration. A comparative study of 50 discs. J Bone Joint Surg Br 68(3):369–373

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Boden SD, Davis DO, Dina TS, Patronas NJ, Wiesel SW (1990) Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72(3):403–408

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lindblom K (1948) Technique and results of diagnostic disc puncture and injection (discography) in the lumbar region. Acta Orthop Scand 17:213–239

    Google Scholar 

  5. Block AR, Vanharanta H, Ohnmeiss DD, Guyer RD (1996) Discographic pain report. Influ Psychol Factors Spine 21(3):334–338

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Schellhas KP, Pollei SR (1994) The role of discography in the evaluation of patients with spinal deformity. Orthop Clin North Am 25(2):265–273

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Resnick DK, Malone DG, Ryken TC (2002) Guidelines for the use of discography for the diagnosis of painful degenerative lumbar disc disease. Neurosurg Focus 13(2):E12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Colhoun E, McCall IW, Williams L (1988) Provocation discography as a guide to planning operations on the spine. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 70:267–271

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gill K, Blumenthal SL (1992) Functional results after anterior lumbar fusion at L5-S1 in patients with normal and abnormal MRI scans. Spine 17:940–942

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Weinstein J, Claverie W, Gibson S (1988) The pain of discography. Spine 13(12):1344–1348

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gunzburg R, Parkinson R, Moore R, Cantraine F, Hutton W, Vernon-Roberts B, Fraser R (1992) A cadaveric study comparing discography, magnetic resonance imaging, histology, and mechanical behavior of the human lumbar disc. Spine 17(4):417–426

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Brinckmann P, Horst M (1985) The influence of vertebral body fracture, intradiscal injection, and partial discectomy on the radial bulge and height of human lumbar discs. Spine 10(2):138–145

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Herbert MA, Kent D, Rashbaum RF, Ohnmeiss DD (1992) Transfer of intervertebral disc pressure to adjacent disc during discography. International Society for the study of the Lumbar Spine

  14. Guyer RD, Ohnineiss DD (1995) Lumbar Discography: position statement from the North American Spine Society Diagnostic and Therapeutic Committee. Spine 20(18):2048–2059

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alihan Derincek.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Derincek, A., Mehbod, A., Schellhas, K. et al. Discography: can pain in a morphologically normal disc be due to an adjacent abnormal disc?. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 127, 699–703 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-007-0323-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-007-0323-x

Keywords

Navigation