Skip to main content
Log in

Repair of articular cartilage lesions in aged chickens by allogeneic transplantation of fresh embryonic epiphyses

  • Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The potential of fresh whole chick epiphyses of embryonic origin to serve as implant material for cartilage defects of aged chicken was tested.

Materials and methods

Fresh epiphyses of 11-day-old embryos were collected from 24 animals and transplanted into defects created in the weight-bearing areas of tibiotarsal joint cartilage of 2-year-old chicks. Upon sacrifice, samples were examined macroscopically and microsections were prepared for histology.

Results

Macroscopically, control defects remained empty at all the time intervals. Defects of the experimental group were, on the other hand, filled with cartilaginous tissue as early as 2 weeks posttransplantation, although individual epiphyses could still be noted in the implant tissue. At 4 weeks and later, defects were filled with cartilaginous material indistinguishable from hyaline cartilage. Histologically, all grafts remained within the defect’s pits, showing mitotic and metabolic activity typical to proliferating hyaline cartilage. The engrafted epiphyses showed a partial incorporation and integration with the surrounding host tissues already at 2 weeks. At 4 weeks and later, the integration was complete.

Conclusions

It is concluded that a chick embryonic epiphyseal cartilage is suitable as a graft source for articular cartilage transplantation. The embryonic epiphyses provide immediate inherent stability to the graft and supply a good mix of mesenchymal progenitor cells responsible for the high rate of cell proliferation and adhesion to the differentiated committed chondrocytes of the host that create the typical favorable chondrogenic milieu. Based on the present findings, it is postulated that human embryonic epiphyses may, in the future, represent an alternative source to the commonly used techniques of hyaline cartilage repair.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Furukawa T, Eyre DR, Koide S, Glimcher MJ (1980) Biochemical studies on repair cartilage resurfacing experimental defects in the rabbit knee. J Bone Joint Surg A 62:79–89

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. O’Driscoll SW, Salter RB (1984) The induction of neochondrogenesis in free intra articular periosteal autografts under the influence of continuous passive motion: an experimental study in the rabbit. J Bone Joint Surg A 66:1248–1257

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Toolan BC, Frenkel SR, Pereira DS, Alexander H (1998) Development of a novel osteochondral graft for cartilage repair. J Biomed Mater Res 41:244–250

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chu CR, Convery FR, Akeson WH, Meyers M, Amiel D (1999) Articular cartilage transplantation. Clin Orthop 360:159–168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bakay A, Csonge L, Papp G, Fekete L (1998) Osteochondral resurfacing of the knee joint with allograft. Clinical analysis of 33 cases. Int Orthop 22:277–281

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fitzpatrick PL, Morgan DA (1998) Fresh osteochondral allografts: a 6–10 year review. Aust N Z J Surg 68:573–579

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Imhoff AB, Ottl GM, Burkart A, Traub S (1999) Autologous osteochondral transplantation on various joints. Orthopade 28:33–44

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kish G, Modis L, Hangody L (1999) Osteochondral mosaicplasty for the treatment of focal chondral and osteochondral lesions of the knee and talus in the athlete. Clin Sports Med 18:45–66

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Robinson D, Halperin N, Nevo Z (1991) Long-term follow-up of the fate of xenogeneic transplants of chondrocytes implanted into joint surfaces. Transplantation 52:380–383

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nevo Z, Robinson D, Horowitz S, Hasharoni Yayon A (1998) The manipulated mesenchymal stem cells in regenerated skeletal tissues. Cell Transplant 7:63–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sharma B, Elisseeff JH (2004) Engineering structurally organized cartilage and bone tissues. Ann Biomed Eng 32:148–159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Raimondi MT, Boschetti F, Falcone L, Migliavacca F, Remuzzi A, Dubini G (2004) The effect of media perfusion on three-dimensional cultures of human chondrocytes. Biorheology 41:401–410

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ringe J, Kaps C, Burmester GR, Sittinger M (2002) Stem cells for regenerative medicine: advances in the engineering of tissues and organs. Naturwissenschaften 89:338–351

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Johnstone B, Yoo J (2001) Mesenchymal cell transfer for articular cartilage repair. Expert Opin Biol Ther 1:915–921

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Schaefer DJ, Klemt C, Zhang XH, Stark GB (2000) Tissue engineering with mesenchymal stem cells for cartilage and bone regeneration. Chirurg 71:1001–1008

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Im GI, Kim DY, Shin JH, Hyun CW, Chow WH (2001) Repair of cartilage defect in the rabbit with cultured mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow. Bone Joint Surg Br 83:289–294

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sakai D, Mochida J, Yamamoto Y, Nomura T, Okuma M, Nishimura K, Nakai T (2003) Transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells embedded in atelocollagen gel to the intervertebral disc. Biomaterials 24:3531–3541

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Aung T, Miyoshi H, Tun T, Oshima N (2002) Chondroinduction of mouse mesenchymal stem cells in three-dimensional highly porous matrix scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res 61:75–82

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Levenberg S, Huang NF, Lavik E, Rogers AB, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Langer R (2003) Differentiation of human embryonic stem cells on three-dimensional polymer scaffolds. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:12741–12746

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Martin I, Padera RF, Vunjak-Novakovic G, Freed LE (1998) In vitro differentiation of chick embryo bone marrow stroma into cartilaginous and bone-like tissues. J Orthop Res 16:181–189

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Cai S, Hu R, Wang H (1998) Repair of cartilage defect in joint with transplantation of cryopreserved homologous embryonic periosteum of rabbits. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 12:117–121

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Robinson D, Halperin N, Nevo Z (1989) Fate of allogeneic embryonal chick chondrocytes implanted orthotopically, as determined by the host’s age. Mech Aging Dev 50:71–80

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Robinson D, Halperin N, Nevo Z (1990) Regenerating hyaline cartilage in articular defects of old chickens using implants of embryonal chick chondrocytes embedded in a new natural delivery substance. Calcif Tissue Int 46:246–253

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Nevo Z, Lev-El A, Siegal T, Altaratz C, Segal S, Dolev S, Nebel L (1983) Fresh and cryopreserved fetal bones replacing massive bone loss in rats. Calcif Tissue Int 35:62–69

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Thomson JA, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Shapiro SS, Waknitz MA, Swiergiel JJ, Marshal VS, Jones JM (1998) Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science 282:1827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Duke J, Daane E, Arizpe J, Montufar-Solis D (1996) Chondrogenesis in aggregates of embryonic limb cells grown rotating wall vessel. Adv Space Res 17:289–293

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Cottrill CP, Crawley A, Tickle C (1990) The behaviour of cells from the distal tips of quail wing buds grafted back into chick wings after micromass culture. Cell Differ Dev 29:67–80

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wagner W, Reichl J, Wehrmann M, Zenner HP (2001) Neonatal rat cartilage has the capacity for tissue regeneration. Wound Repair Regen 9:531–536

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Cohen I, Robinson D, Cohen N, Nevo Z (2000) Storing live embryonic and adult human cartilage grafts for transplantation using a joint simulating device. Biomaterials 21:2117–2123

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Reginato AM, Iozzo RV, Jimenez SA (1994) Formation of nodular structures resembling mature articular cartilage in long-term primary cultures of human fetal epiphyseal chondrocytes on a hydrogel substrate. Arthritis Rheum 37:1338–1349

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Specchia N, Gigante A, Falciglia F, Greco F (1996) Fetal chondral homografts in the repair of articular cartilage defects. Bull Hosp J Dis 54:230–235

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Perka C, Lindenhayn K, Heilmann HH, Sittinger M, Muschik M (1996) Experimental studies of mechanically induced articular cartilage defects following implantation of allogeneic embryonal chondrium in a collagen-fibrin gel in chickens. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 134:562–572

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Perka C, Schultz O, Lindenhayn K, Spitzer RS, Muschik M, Sittinger M, Burmester GR (2000) Joint cartilage repair with transplantation of embryonic chondrocytes embedded in collagen-fibrin matrices. Clin Exp Rheumatol 18:13–22

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eitan Melamed.

Additional information

We declare that the experiments comply with the current laws of the state of Israel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cohen, I., Melamed, E., Robinson, D. et al. Repair of articular cartilage lesions in aged chickens by allogeneic transplantation of fresh embryonic epiphyses. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 127, 763–768 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-006-0204-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-006-0204-8

Keywords

Navigation