Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Stiffness measurement of the neocallus with the Fraktometer FM 100®

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction: The assessment of fracture healing is subjective, and neither radiology nor manual examination allows a reliable determination of bone healing. Fracture healing control in the treatment of tibia shaft fracture with external fixator by a stiffness measurement system (Fraktometer FM 100®) is known from clinical studies. The purpose of this study was to follow stiffness control at external fixator in healing of callotasis with the stiffness measurement system. Materials and methods: From 1994 to 1997 stiffness measurements with the described system (Fraktometer FM 100) were performed in the BG-Clinic Ludwigshafen to assess the healing course in 11 cases of callotasis at lower limb. Results: In ten cases, regular healing could be followed by signal decrease; in one case, a persistent signal without tendency to decrease was able to reveal callotasis failure at an early point of time. The investigation could also show the importance of bending stiffness control. One case of late axis deformation after fixator removal occurred because of disregarding delayed bending signal decrease. Conclusion: Measurements of the external fixator’s stiffness after callotasis can provide useful additional information for further treatment strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Benirschke SK, Mirels SH, Tencer AF (1993) The use of resonant frequency measurement for the noninvasive assessment of mechanical stiffness of the healing tibia. J Orthop Trauma 7:64–71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Claes L (1991) Die Messung der Knochenheilung bei Fixateur-externe Osteosynthesen mit dem Fraktometer FM-100. Chirurg 62:354–355

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Claes L, Grass R, Schmickal T, Wentzensen A (2002) Monitoring and healing analysis of 100 tibial shaft fractures. Langenbecks Arch Surg 387:146–152

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dwyer JSM, Owen PJ, Evans GA, Kuiper JH, Richardson JB (1996) Stiffness measurements to assess healing during leg lengthening. J. Bone Joint Surg 78-B:286–289

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eastaugh-Waring SJ, Hardy JR, Cunningham JL (2000) Fracture stiffness measurement using the orthometer: reproducibility and sources of error. Clin Biomech 15(2):140–142

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Eyres KS, Bell MJ, Kanis JA (1993) New bone formation during leg lengthening: evaluated by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry during limb lengthening. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 75-B:96–106

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fellinger M, Schanzer A, Szyszkowitz R, Leitgeb N, Stockenhuber N, Roupec R (1993) Computerisierte Sonometrie—die Anwendung eines nichtinvasiven Verfahrens zur Stabilitätsbeurteilung nach Frakturen. Akt Traumatol 23:235–238

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kisse B, Eggers C (1995) Können Zeitpunkt und Indikation zur sekundären Knochentransplantation bei verzögerter Knochenbruchheilung unter Fixateur-externe-Behandlung durch Fraktometermessung bestimmt werden? In: Wolter D, Hansis M, Havemann D (eds) Externe und interne Fixationssysteme. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 112–114

    Google Scholar 

  9. Raschke MJ, Claudi BF (1998) Monorail-Methode: Segmenttransport und Verlängerung. In: Rüter A, Kohn D, Correll J, Brutscher R (eds) Kallusdistraktion. Urban & Schwarzenberg, München Wien Baltimore, pp 79–90

    Google Scholar 

  10. Richardson JB, Cunninghamm JL, Goodship AE, O‘Connor BT (1994) Measuring stiffness can define healing of tibial shaft fractures. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 76:389–394

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Richardson JB, O’Connor BT (1993) Direct fracture stiffness measurement in tibial fractures. Int J Orthop Trauma 3:72–74

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schmickal T, Wentzensen A (1996) Die Fraktometermessung zur Beurteilung des Neokallus. Swiss Surg (Suppl) 2:13

    Google Scholar 

  13. Schmickal T, Winkler H, Wentzensen A (1996) Fraktometermessung zur Beurteilung der Stabilität des Neokallus. Hefte zur Unfallheilkunde 262:158

    Google Scholar 

  14. Stürmer KM, Rack T (1990) Intravitale Bewegungsmessungen bei der Frakturheilung. Hefte Unfallheilkunde 212:489–498

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tower SS, Beals RK, Duwelius PJ (1993) Resonant frequency analysis of the tibia as a measure of fracture healing. J Orthop Trauma 7:552–557

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wentzensen A (1995) In-vivo-Messung der Knochenheilung bei Fixateur externe-Osteosynthesen. In: Wolter D, Hansis M, Havemann D (eds) Externe und interne Fixationssysteme. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 107–111

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Ludwigshafen, Unfallchirurgische Klinik an der Universität Heidelberg, Ludwig-Guttmann-Str. 11-13, 67071, Ludwigshafen, Germany

    T. Schmickal, J. von. Recum & A. Wentzensen

Authors
  1. T. Schmickal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. von. Recum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. Wentzensen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Schmickal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schmickal, T., Recum, J.v. & Wentzensen, A. Stiffness measurement of the neocallus with the Fraktometer FM 100® . Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 125, 653–659 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-005-0049-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-005-0049-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation