Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

New concepts in the treatment of ankle joint fractures

The IP-XS (XSL) and IP-XXS (XXSL) nail in the treatment of ankle joint fractures

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The most important factor in the treatment of ankle joint fractures is stable anatomical reconstruction of the syndesmosis and joint surface. In the course of this, attention must be paid to soft-tissue damage with the risk of deep infections. Early functional therapy and exercise tolerance must be called for. The choice of surgical access route, in particular in the case of critical arterial circulation, and the possible irritation of the soft tissue by the osteosynthesis material prompted us to seek alternative osteosynthesis techniques.

Material and methods

Following a preclinical study and very good initial results with the XS nail in the treatment of patella and olecranon fractures, this was now also used for ankle joint fractures at the medial malleolus and lateral malleolus. In the period from 5/2000 to 1/2002, 194 ankle joint fractures were treated using the XS nail. These were predominantly Weber B, C and bimalleolar fractures. In the case of ankle joint fractures, osteosynthesis was carried out following precise open fracture repositioning. In the case of isolated fibula fractures, early loading was allowed within 1 week; in the case of bimalleolar fractures, there was immediate partial loading with 20 kg for 4 weeks, after which they were subjected to full loading. Where there was an additional Volkmann fracture, we allowed only immediate partial loading with 10 kg for 6 weeks. All 194 patients were observed prospectively, and 162 (83.5%) could be followed up after 15 months. The results were classified according to the scale described by Olerud.

Results

It has been possible to follow up 162 patients, with an average age of 49.7 years. There were 62 (38.3%) Weber B and 45 (27.8%) Weber C fractures. In 55 (34.0%) cases, bimalleolar fractures were present. According to the Olerud score, 95 (58.6%) of the patients had an excellent outcome, 54 (33.3%) a good one, 9 (5.5%) a fair one and 4 (2.5%) an unsatisfactory outcome. In 3 cases a threaded wire dislocation occurred, without complications. Two mesh graft transplants were necessary; otherwise, there were no soft-tissue problems requiring review. One pseudarthrosis was seen.

Conclusion

The XS nail which is introduced here fulfils the requirements made of an implant as regards maximum protection of soft tissue, secure fracture fixation and early exercise tolerance, including ankle fractures. No implant dislocation, no deep infection and no re-osteosynthesis were observed. Its advantages over conventional techniques lie precisely in the treatment of complex fractures and for patients with poor bone, vascular and soft-tissue situations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6a–e
Fig. 7a, b
Fig. 8a, b
Fig. 9a, b

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blotter RH, Connolly E, Wasan A, Chapman MVV (1999) Acute complications in the operative treatment of isolated ankle fractures in patients with diabetes mellitus. Foot Ankle Int 20:687–694

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cedell CA (1967) Supination-outward rotation injuries of the ankle. Dissertation. Acta Orthop Scand [Suppl] 110

  3. Destot E (1911) Traumatisme du pied et rayons X malleoles, astragale, calcaneum, avant-pied. Masson, Paris

  4. Friedl W (1998) Zuggurtungsnagelsystem für axiale Kompressionsosteosynthese der Patella. 62 Jahrestag der Deut. Ges. für Unfallchirurgie e.V.: 721

  5. Gehr J, Friedl W (2001) Probleme der Zuggurtungsosteosynthese von Patellafrakturen und deren Konsequenzen für weitere Implantatentwicklungen. Der XS-Nagel. Der Chirurg 72:1309–1318

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Henke G (1964) Vergleichende Ergebnisse der konservativen und operativen Knochenbruchbehandlung unter Berücksichtigung der Einteilung nach Niels Lauge Hansen. Dissertation, Basel

  7. Hughes JL, Weber H (1979) Evaluation of ankle fractures. Clin Orthop 138:111

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Learch WJ, Fordyce MJ (1994) Audit of ankle fracture fixation in the elderly. J R Coll Surg Edinb 39:124–127

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lindsjö U (1981) Operative treatment of ankle fractures. Acta Orthop Scand [Suppl] 52

  10. Lindsjö U (1985) Operative treatment of ankle fracture-dislocations. Clin Orthop 199:28–38

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Low CK, Pang HY, Wong HP, Low YP (1997) A retrospective evaluation of operative treatment of ankle fractures. Ann Acad Med Singapore 26:172–174

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. McCormack RG, Leith JM (1998) Ankle fractures in diabetics. Complications of surgical management. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:689–692

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nonnemann HC, Plötsch J (1993) Verrenkungsbrüche des oberen Sprunggelenkes. Klassifizierung-Behandlung-Ergebnisse. Aktuell Traumatol 23:183

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Olerud C, Molander H (1984) A scale for symptom evaluation after ankle fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 103:190–194

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ponzer S, Nasell H (1999) Functional outcome and quality of life in patients with type B ankle fractures: a two-year follow-up study. J Orthop Trauma 13:363–368

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ramsey PL, Hamilton W (1976) Changes in tibiotalar area of contact caused by lateral talar shift. J Bone Joint Surg Am 58:356–357

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Richter J, Schulze W, Muhr G (1999) Stabile Knöchelbrüche. Indikation zur Operation oder konservativer Therapie? Orthopäde 28:493–499

  18. Riede UN, Schenk R, Willenegger H (1971) Gelenkmechanische Untersuchungen zum Problem der posttraumatischen Arthrosen im oberen Sprunggelenk. Langenbecks Arch Klein Chir 328:258–271

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Schweiberer L, Seiler H (1978) Spätergebnisse bei operativ behandelten Malleolarfrakturen. Unfallheilkunde 81:195–202

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sinisaari I et al (1996) Metallic or absorbable implants for ankle fractures: a comparative study of infections in 3111 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 67:16–18

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tassler H (1981) Behandlungsprinzipien bei drittgradigen offenen Frakturen des distalen Unterschenkels. Unfallheilkunde 84:509

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Weber BG (1966) Die Verletzungen des oberen Sprunggelenkes. Huber, Bern

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Klinikum Aschaffenburg, Abtl. Unfall- Hand- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Am Hasenkopf 1, 63739 , Aschaffenburg, Germany

    J. Gehr, W. Neber, F. Hilsenbeck & W. Friedl

Authors
  1. J. Gehr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. W. Neber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. F. Hilsenbeck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. W. Friedl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Gehr.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gehr, J., Neber, W., Hilsenbeck, F. et al. New concepts in the treatment of ankle joint fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124, 96–103 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-003-0606-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-003-0606-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation