Abstract
Introduction
There have been a number of non-randomized studies comparing arthroplasty with internal fixation in patients with femoral neck fractures. However, there remains considerable debate about whether the results of non-randomized studies are consistent with the results of randomized, controlled trials. Given the economic burden of hip fractures, it remains essential to identify therapies to improve outcomes; however, whether data from non-randomized studies of an intervention should be used to guide patient care remains unclear. We aimed to determine whether the pooled results of mortality and revision surgery among non-randomized studies were similar to those of randomized trials in studies comparing arthroplasty with internal fixation in patients with femoral neck fractures.
Materials and methods
We conducted a Medline search from 1969 to June 2002, identifying both randomized and non-randomized studies comparing internal fixation with arthroplasty in patients with femoral neck fractures. Additional strategies to identify relevant articles included Cochrane database, SCISEARCH, textbooks, annual meeting programs, and content experts. We abstracted information on mortality and revision rates in each study and compared the pooled results between non-randomized and randomized studies. In addition, we explored potential reasons for dissimilar results between the two study designs.
Results
We identified 140 citations that addressed the general topic of comparison of arthroplasty and internal fixation for hip fracture. Of these, 27 studies met the eligibility criteria, 13 of which were non-randomized studies and 14 of which were randomized trials. Mortality data was available in all 13 non-randomized studies (n=3108 patients) and in 12 randomized studies (n=1767 patients). Non-randomized studies overestimated the risk of mortality by 40% when compared with the results of randomized trials (relative risk 1.44 vs 1.04, respectively). Information on revision risk was available in 9 non-randomized studies (n=2764 patients) and all 14 randomized studies (n=1901 patients). Both estimates from non-randomized and randomized studies revealed a significant reduction in the risk of revision surgery with arthroplasty compared with internal fixation (relative risk 0.38 vs 0.23, respectively). The reduction in the risk of revision surgery with arthroplasty compared with internal fixation was 62% for non-randomized studies and 77% for randomized trials. Thus, non-randomized studies underestimated the relative benefit of arthroplasty by 19.5%. Non-randomized studies with point estimates of relative risk similar to the pooled estimate for randomized trials all controlled for patient age, gender, and fracture displacement in their comparisons of mortality. We were unable to identify reasons for differences in the revision rate results between the study designs.
Conclusions
Similar to other reports in medical subspecialties, non-randomized studies provided results dissimilar to randomized trials of arthroplasty vs internal fixation for mortality and revision rates in patients with femoral neck fractures. Investigators should be aware of these discrepancies when evaluating the merits of alternative surgical interventions, especially when both randomized trials and non-randomized comparative studies are available.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Benson K, Hartz AJ (2000) A comparison of observational studies and randomized, controlled trials. N Engl J Med 342:1878–1886
Bracey DJ (1977) A comparison of internal fixation and prosthetic replacement in the treatment of displaced subcapital fractures. Injury 9:1–4
Breslow NE, Day DE (1980) Combination of results from a series of 2×2 tables;control of confounding. In: Statistical methods in cancer research, Vol 1. The analysis of case-control studies. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, pp 136-146
Broos P, Stappaerts K, Luiten EJ, Gruwez JA (1987) Endoprosthesis. The best way to treat unstable intracapsular hip fractures in elderly patients. Unfallchirurg 90:347–350
Chalmers TC, Celano P, Sacks HS, Smith H Jr (1983) Bias in treatment assignment in controlled clinical trials. N Engl J Med 309:1358–1361
Chua D, Jaglal S, Schatzker J (1997) An orthopaedic surgeon survey on the treatment of displaced femoral neck fracture: opposing views. Can J Surg 40:271–277
Colditz GA, Miller JN, Mosteller F (1989) How study design affects outcomes in comparisons of therapy. I. Medical. Stat Med 8:441-454
Concato J, Shah N, Horwitz RI (2000) Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs. N Engl J Med 342:1887–1894
Davison JNS, Calder SJ, Anderson GH, Ward G, Jagger C, Harper WM, Gregg PJ (2001) Treatment of displaced intracapsular fracture of the proximal femur: a prospective randomized trial in patients aged 65–79 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83:206–212
DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis of clinical trials. Cont Clin Trials 7:177-188
Emerson JD, Burdick E, Hoaglin DC et al (1990) An empirical study of the possible relation of treatment differences to quality scores in controlled randomized clinical trials. Controlled Clin Trials 11:339–352
Guyatt GH, Rennie D (eds) (2001) User’s guides to the medical literature: a manual for evidence-based clinical practice. American Medical Association Press, Chicago
Heikkinen T, Wingstrand H, Partanen J, Karl-Goran T, Jalovaara P (2002) Hemiarthroplasty or osteosynthesis in cervical hip fractures: matched pair analysis in 892 patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 122:143–147
Hudson JI, Kenzora JE, Hebel JR, Gardner JF, Scherlis L, Epstein RS, Magaziner JS (1998) Eight-year outcome associated with clinical options in the management of femoral neck fractures. Clin Orthop 348:59–66
Hui AC, Anderson GH, Choudhry R, Boyle J, Gregg PJ (1994) Internal fixation or hemiarthroplasty for undisplaced fractures of the femoral neck in octogenarians. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76:891–894
Hunter GA (1969) A comparison of the use of internal fixation and prosthetic replacement for fresh fractures of the neck of the femur. Br J Surg 56:229–232
Hunter GA (1974) A further comparison of the use of internal fixation and prosthetic replacement for fresh fractures of the neck of the femur. Br J Surg61:382–384
Ioannidis JP, Haidich AB, Pappa M, Pantazis N, Kokori SI, Tektonidou MG, Contopoulos-Ioannidis DG, Lau J (2001) Comparison of evidence of treatment effects in randomized and nonrandomized studies. JAMA 286:821–830
Jensen J, Rasmussen T, Christensen S, Holm-Moller S, Lauritzen J (1984) Internal fixation or prosthetic replacement in fresh femoral neck fractures. Acta Orthop Scand 55:712
Johansson T, Jacobsson SA, Ivarsson I, Knutsson A, Wahlstrom O (2000) Internal fixation versus total hip arthroplasty in the treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures: a prospective randomized study of 100 hips. Acta Orthop Scand 71:597–602
Johnson J, Crothers O (1975) Nailing vs prosthesis for femoral neck fractures: a critical review of long term results in two hundred thirty nine consecutive private patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 57:686–692
Jonsson B, Sernbo I, Carlsson A, Fredin H, Johnell O (1996) Social function after cervical hip fracture: a comparison of hook-pins and total hip replacement in 47 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 67:431–434
Kunz R, Oxman AD (1998) The unpredictability paradox: review of empirical comparisons of randomised and non-randomised clinical trials. BMJ 317:1185–1190
Magaziner J, Simonsick E, Kashner T, Hebel J, Kenzora J (1990) Predictors of functional recovery one year following hospital discharge for hip fracture. A prospective study. J Gerontol 45:101–107
Neander G, Adolphson P, Sivers K von, Dahlborn M, Dalen N (1997) Bone and muscle mass after femoral neck fracture: a controlled quantitative computed tomographic study of osteosynthesis versus primary total hip arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 116:470–474
Nicoll EA (1953) The unsolved fracture. J Bone Joint Surg 35:805–821
Parker M, Blundell C (1998) Choice of implant for internal fixation of femoral neck fractures: meta-analysis of 25 randomized trials including 4,925 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 69:138–143
Parker MJ (1992) Internal fixation or arthroplasty for displaced subcapital fractures in the elderly? Injury 23:521–524
Parker MJ, Pryor GA (2000) Internal fixation or arthroplasty for displaced cervical hip fractures in the elderly: a randomised controlled trial of 208 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 7:440–446
Puolakka TJS, Laine H, Tarvainen T, Aho H (2001) Thompson hemi-arthroplasty is superior to ulleval screws in treating displaced femoral neck fractures in patients over 75 years. A prospective randomized two-year follow up. Ann Chirurg Gynaecol 90:225–228
Raine GE (1973) A comparison of internal fixation and prosthetic replacement for recent displaced subcapital fractures of the neck of the femur. Injury 5:25–30
Ravikumar KJ, Marsh G (2000) Internal fixation versus hemiarthroplasty versus total hip arthroplasty for displaced subcapital fractures of femur--13 year results of a prospective randomised study. Injury 31:793–797
Rodriguez J, Herrara A, Canales V, Serrano S (1987) Epidemiologic factors, morbidity and mortality after femoral neck fractures in the elderly. A comparative study: internal fixation vs. hemiarthroplasty. Acta Orthop Belg 53:472–479
Rogmark C, Carlsson, Jonnell O, Sernbo I (2002) A prospective randomized trial of internal fixation versus arthroplasty for displaced fractures of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84:183–188
Sackett DL, Haynes RB, Guyatt GH, Tugwell P (1991) Clinical epidemiology, a basic science for clinical medicine, 2nd edn. Little Brown, Boston
Sacks HS, Chalmers TC, Smith H Jr (1983) Sensitivity and specificity of clinical trials. Randomized v historical controls. Arch Intern Med 143:753–755
Sikorski JM, Barrington R (1981) Internal fixation versus hemiarthroplasty for the displaced subcapital fracture of the femur. A prospective randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 63:357–361
Soreide O, Molster A, Raugstad TS (1979) Internal fixation versus primary prosthetic replacement in acute femoral neck fractures: a prospective, randomized clinical study. Br J Surg 66:56–60
Stewart H (1987) Pugh’s nail fixation versus Thompson’s prosthesis for displaced subcapital fractures of the femur. Injury 15:227–231
Tidermark J, Ponzer S, Svensson O, Tornkvist H (1999) Internal fixation versus primary hip arthoplasty for dislocated femoral neck fractures: a prospective randomized study. Presented at the 15th annual meeting of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association, Charlotte, NC, October 1999, pp112–113
Turcotte R, Godin C, Duchesne R, Jodoin A (1990) Hip fractures in Parkinson’s disease: a clinical review of 94 fractures treated surgically. Clin Orthop 256:132–136
Van Dortmont LM, Douw CM, Breukelen AM van, Laurens DR, Mulder PG, Wereldsma JC, Vugt AB van (2000) Cannulated screws versus hemiarthroplasty for displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures in demented patients. Ann Chir Gynaecol 89:132–137
Van Vugt AB, Oosterwijk WM, Goris RJ (1993) Osteosynthesis versus endoprosthesis in the treatment of unstable intracapsular hip fractures in the elderly. A randomised clinical trial. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 113:39–45
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Disclaimer: No funding was received for the preparation of this manuscript.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bhandari, M., Tornetta, P., Ellis, T. et al. Hierarchy of evidence: differences in results between non-randomized studies and randomized trials in patients with femoral neck fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124, 10–16 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-003-0559-z
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-003-0559-z