Abstract
Background
In the hierarchy of research designs, randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses are considered to be evidence of the highest grade, and scientific journals are the main source of scientific information.
Methods
Using the National Library of Medicine Medline database, all randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses from 1966 to 1999 were retrieved from the journals indexed in the core list of the Science Citation Index in 1999, dedicated primarily to orthopaedics. The abstracts of the articles were reviewed independently by each author and classified by the year, journal name and subject.
Results
The total number of articles was 36,293, of which only 671 were randomized controlled trials (1.85%) and 12 were meta-analyses (0.03%). Although there was a progressively increasing trend for randomized controlled trials, more than half of them (81.9%) were published in four journals. Of the randomized controlled trials, 66% was about arthroplasty, and hip and knee arthroplasties covered 90.7%.
Conclusion
Although the number of randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses is tending to increase, the conclusion of this study is that the high-quality evidence provided by the major orthopaedic journals is quite low, and more randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses are needed for evidence-based orthopaedic practice.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Begg C, Cho M, Eastwood S, Horton R, Moher D, Olkin I, Ritkin R, Dennie D, Schulz KF, Simel D, Stroup DF (1996) Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement. J Am Med Assoc 276:637–639
Bhandari M, Guyatt GH, Swiontkowski ME (2001) User's guide to the orthopaedic literature: how to use an article about a surgical therapy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83:916–926
Bhandari M, Morrow F, Kulkarni AV, Tornetta P III (2001) Meta-analyses in orthopaedic surgery. A systemic review of their methodologies. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83:15–24
Boerger TO, Limb T, Dickson TA (2000) Does 'canal clearance' affect neurological outcome after thoracolumbar burst fractures? J Bone Joint Surg Br 82:629–635
Chalmers TC, Smith H Jr, Blackburn B, Silverman B, Schroeder B, Reitman D, Ambroz A (1981) A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial. Controlled Clin Trials 2:31–49
Concato J, Shah N, Horwitz RI (2000) Randomized controlled trials, observational studies and the hierarchy of research designs. N Engl J Med 342:1987–1992
Hardin WD, Lally KP (1999) Evidence-based practice in pediatric surgery. J Pediatr Surg 34:908–913
Heinegard D, Johnell O, Lidgren L, Nilsson O, Rydevik B, Wollheim F, Akesson K (1998) The bone and joint decade 2000–2010. Acta Orthop Scand 69:219–220
Labella H, Guibert R, Joncas J, Newman N, Fallaha M, Rivard C-H (1992) Lack of scientific evidence for the treatment of lateral epicondylitis. An attempted meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74:646–651
LeLorier J, Gregoire G, Benhaddad A, Lapierre J, Derdevian F (1997) Discrepancies between meta-analyses and subsequent large randomized controlled trials. N Engl J Med 337:536–542
Lomas J, Anderson GM, Dominick-Pierre K, Wajda E, Enkin MW, Hannah WJ (1989) Do practice guidelines guide practice? The effect of consensus statement on the practice of physicians. N Engl J Med 321:306–311
Rudicel S, Esdale J (1985) The randomized clinical trial in orthopaedics: obligation or option? J Bone Joint Surg Am 67:1284–1293
Sackett DL (1998) Evidence-based medicine. Spine 23:1085–1086
Sacks HS, Berrier J, Reitman D, Ancona-Berk VA, Chalmers TC (1987) Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. N Engl J Med 316:450–455
Walsh EF, Weinstein JN (1998) Spine: scientific citation index and its impact factor. Spine 23:1087–1090
Wennberg JE, Gittelsohn A (1982) Variations in medical care among small areas. Sci Am 246:120–135
Whimster WF (1997) Biomedical research. How to plan, publish and present it. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kıter, E., Karatosun, V. & Günal, I. Do orthopaedic journals provide high-quality evidence for clinical practice?. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 123, 82–85 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-003-0501-4
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-003-0501-4