Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Implantierbarer Loop-Rekorder BioMonitor 2 (Fa. Biotronik)

Implantable loop recorder BioMonitor 2 (Biotronik)

  • Schwerpunkt
  • Published:
Herzschrittmachertherapie + Elektrophysiologie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Der implantierbare Loop-Rekorder BioMonitor 2 ermöglicht in den 2 Varianten für Synkopendiagnostik und Detektion von atrialen Tachykardien eine leichte Handhabung bei der Implantation. In der BioMonitor-2-Pilotstudie zeigte sich eine hohe und über die Zeit stabile Signalqualität sowie eine überdurchschnittliche telemetrische Übertragungsrate.

Abstract

The implantable loop recorder BioMonitor 2 is available with an emphasis on syncope and one on detection of atrial tachycardias. The BioMonitor 2 can be easily implanted. The BioMonitor 2 pilot study showed a high and over time stable signal and the telemetric performance was above average.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1
Abb. 2

Literatur

  1. Colilla S, Crow A, Petkun W, Singer DE, Simon T, Liu X (2013) Estimates of current and future incidence and prevalence of atrial fibrillation in the U.S. adult population. Am J Cardiol 112(8):1142–1147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wolf PA, Abbott RD, Kannel WB (1991) Atrial fibrillation as an independent risk factor for stroke: the Framingham Study. Stroke 22(8):983–988

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hart RG, Diener HC, Coutts SB, Easton JD, Granger CB, O’Donnell MJ, Sacco RL, Connolly SJ, Cryptogenic Stroke/ESUS International Working Group (2014) Embolic strokes of undetermined source: the case for a new clinical construct. Lancet Neurol 13(4):429–438

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stewart S, Hart CL, Hole DJ, McMurray JJ (2002) A population-based study of the long-term risks associated with atrial fibrillation: 20-year follow-up of the Renfrew/Paisley study. Am J Med 113(5):359–364

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Friberg L, Rosenqvist M, Lip GY (2012) Net clinical benefit of warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: a report from the Swedish atrial fibrillation cohort study. Circulation 125(19):2298–2307

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sanna T, Diener HC, Passman RS, Di Lazzaro V, Bernstein RA, Morillo CA, Rymer MM, Thijs V, Rogers T, Beckers F, Lindborg K, Brachmann J, CRYSTAL AF Investigators (2014) Cryptogenic stroke and underlying atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 370(26):2478–2486

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gladstone DJ, Spring M, Dorian P, Panzov V, Thorpe KE, Hall J, Vaid H, O’Donnell M, Laupacis A, Côté R, Sharma M, Blakely JA, Shuaib A, Hachinski V, Coutts SB, Sahlas DJ, Teal P, Yip S, Spence JD, Buck B, Verreault S, Casaubon LK, Penn A, Selchen D, Jin A, Howse D, Mehdiratta M, Boyle K, Aviv R, Kapral MK, Mamdani M, EMBRACE Investigators and Coordinators (2014) Atrial fibrillation in patients with cryptogenic stroke. N Engl J Med 370(26):2467–2477

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kapa S, Epstein AE, Callans DJ, Garcia FC, Lin D, Bala R, Riley MP, Hutchinson MD, Gerstenfeld EP, Tzou W, Marchlinski FE, Frankel DS, Cooper JM, Supple G, Deo R, Verdino RJ, Patel VV, Dixit S (2013) Assessing arrhythmia burden after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation using an implantable loop recorder: the ABACUS study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 24(8):875–881

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Podd SJ, Sugihara C, Furniss SS, Sulke N (2016) Are implantable cardiac monitors the „gold standard“ for atrial fibrillation detection? A prospective randomized trial comparing atrial fibrillation monitoring using implantable cardiac monitors and DDDRP permanent pacemakers in post atrial fibrillation ablation patients. Europace 18(7):1000–1005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Solbiati M, Costantino G, Casazza G, Dipaola F, Galli A, Furlan R, Montano N, Sheldon R (2016) Implantable loop recorder versus conventional diagnostic workup for unexplained recurrent syncope. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016(4):CD011637

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jons C, Thomsen PE (2012) Treating cardiac arrhythmias detected with an implantable cardiac monitor in patients after an acute myocardial infarction. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med 14(1):39–49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik für Kardiologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin, Peter Osypka Herzzentrum, Kliniken Dr. Müller München, Am Isarkanal 36, 81379, München, Deutschland

    Thorsten Lewalter & Clemens Jilek

Authors
  1. Thorsten Lewalter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Clemens Jilek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thorsten Lewalter.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

T. Lewalter und C. Jilek geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine von den Autoren durchgeführten Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lewalter, T., Jilek, C. Implantierbarer Loop-Rekorder BioMonitor 2 (Fa. Biotronik). Herzschr Elektrophys 27, 337–340 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00399-016-0469-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00399-016-0469-8

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Search

Navigation