Skip to main content
Log in

Vagusstimulation

Mechanismen und momentaner klinischer Stellenwert bei der Herzinsuffizienz

Vagus stimulation

Mechanisms and current clinical importance in heart failure

  • Schwerpunkt
  • Published:
Herzschrittmachertherapie + Elektrophysiologie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Eine gesteigerte sympathische und reduzierte vagale Aktivität sind assoziiert mit einer erhöhten Mortalität sowohl bei Patienten nach Myokardinfarkt wie auch bei Patienten mit chronischer Herzinsuffizienz. Tierexperimentelle Studien belegen, dass die chronische Vagusstimulation über eine erhöhte Parasympathikusaktivität die Mortalität durch plötzlichen Herztod und myokardiales Pumpversagen senken kann. Die zugrunde liegenden Mechanismen hierfür sind vielfältig und beruhen neben einer bloßen Herzfrequenzreduktion und Erhöhung der Herzfrequenzvariabilität experimentell auch auf antiarrhythmischen und antiinflammatorischen Effekten, Erhöhung der Baroreflexsensitivität, Modifikation der Zytokin- und Mediatorausschüttung und Koronardilatation mit verbesserter Perfusion. Erste klinische Ergebnisse der chronischen Vagusstimulation bei Patienten mit chronischer Herzinsuffizienz und systolischer Dysfunktion sind vielversprechend und resultierten in einer Erhöhung der Lebensqualität und gesteigerten Belastbarkeit sowie einer Verbesserung der linksventrikulären Funktion bei insgesamt sicherer Durchführbarkeit.

Abstract

Increased sympathetic activity and reduced vagal activity are associated with increased mortality both after myocardial infarction and in heart failure; furthermore, vagal withdrawal has been documented to precede acute decompensation. Experimental studies indicate that increased parasympathetic activity by means of vagal stimulation may reduce mortality in animal models of post-infarction sudden cardiac death and of chronic heart failure. Initial clinical results demonstrate that chronic vagus nerve stimulation in heart failure patients with severe systolic dysfunction appears to be safe and tolerable and may improve quality of life, submaximal exercise capacity, and LV function. Vagus nerve stimulation derives these potential clinical benefits from multiple mechanisms of action. These include reduced heart rate, restoration of heart rate variability and baroreflex sensitivity, suppression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, and antiarrhythmic effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5
Abb. 6

Literatur

  1. Baensch D, Groenefeld G (2010) Der Patient mit chronischer Herzinsuffizienz. Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol 21:112–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ben-Menachem E (2001) Vagus nerve stimulation, side effects, and long-term safety. J Clin Neurophysiol 18:415–418

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. De Ferrari GM, Crijns HJGM, Borggrefe M et al (2010) Chronic vagus nerve stimulation: a new and promising therapeutic approach for chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J (in press)

  4. De Ferrari GM, Salvati P, Grossoni M et al (1993) Pharmacologic modulation of the autonomic nervous system in the prevention of sudden cardiac death. A study with propranolol, methacholine and oxotremorine in conscious dogs with a healed myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 22:283–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. De Ferrari GM, Sanzo A, Bertoletti A et al (2007) Baroreflex sensitivity predicts long-term cardiovascular mortality after myocardial infarction even in patients with preserved left ventricular function. J Am Coll Cardiol 50:2285–2290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. De Ferrari GM, Schwartz PJ (2011) Vagus nerve stimulation: from pre-clinical to clinical application: challenges and future directions. Heart Fail Rev (in press)

  7. De Ferrari GM, Vanoli E et al (1991) Vagal reflexes and survival during acute myocardial ischemia in conscious dogs with a healed myocardial infarction. Am J Physiol 261:H63–H69

    Google Scholar 

  8. La Rovere MT, Bigger JT Jr, Marcus FI et al (1998) Baroreflex sensitivity and heart-rate variability in prediction of total cardiac mortality after myocardial infarction. Lancet 351:478–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lechat P, Hulot JS, Escolano S et al (2002) Heart rate and cardiac rhythm relationship with bisoprolol benefit in chronic heart failure in CIBIS II trial. Circulation 103:1428–1433

    Google Scholar 

  10. Li M, Zheng C, Sato T et al (2004) Vagal nerve stimulation markedly improves long-term survival after chronic heart failure in rats. Circulation 109:120–124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Milby AH, Halpern CH, Baltuch GH (2008) Vagus nerve stimulation for epilepsy and depression. Neurotherapeutics 5:75–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Olshansky B, Sabbah HN, Hauptman PJ, Colucci WS (2008) Parasympathetic nervous system and heart failure: pathophysiology and potential implications for therapy. Circulation 118:863–871

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rastogi S, Mishra S, Ilsar I et al (2007) Chronic therapy with electric Vagus nerve stimulation normalizes mRNA and protein expression of connexin-40, -43 and -45 in left ventricular myocardium of dogs with heart failure (abstract). Circulation 116:II-218

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sabbah HN, Imai M, Zaretsky A et al (2007) Therapy with vagus nerve electrical stimulation combined with beta-blockade improves left ventricular systolic function in dogs with heart failure beyond that seen with betablockade alone (abstr). Eur J Heart Fail 6:114

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sabbah HN, Itamar I, Zaretsky A et al (2011) Vagus nerve stimulation in experimental heart failure. Heart Fail Rev (in press)

  16. Sabbah HN, Shimoyama H, Kono T et al (1994) Effects of long-term monotherapy with enalapril, metoprolol and digoxin on the progression of left ventricular dysfunction and dilatation in dogs with reduced ejection fraction. Circulation 89:2852–2859

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sabbah HN, Wang M, Jiang A et al (2010) Right vagus nerve stimulation improves left ventricular function in dogs with heart failure (abstr). J Am Coll Cardiol 55(Suppl): A1, E151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Schwartz PJ, De Ferrari GM, Sanzo A et al (2008) Long term vagal stimulation in patients with advanced heart failure: first experience in man. Eur J Heart Fail 10:884–891

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schwartz PJ, Vanoli E, Stramba-Badiale M et al (1988) Autonomic mechanisms and sudden death. New insights from analysis of baroreceptor reflexes in conscious dogs with and without a myocardial infarction. Circulation 78:969–979

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Shuchman M (2007) Approving the vagus-nerve stimulator for depression. N Engl J Med 356:1604–1607

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Swedberg K, Komajda M, Böhm M et al (2010) Ivabradine and outcomes in chronic heart failure (SHIFT): a randomized placebo-controlled study. Lancet 376:875–885

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Tracey KJ (2002) The inflammatory reflex. Nature 420:853–859

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Vanoli E, De Ferrari GM, Stramba-Badiale M et al (1991) Vagal stimulation and prevention of sudden death in conscious dogs with a healed myocardial infarction. Circ Res 68:1471–1481

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Young JB, Abraham WT, Smith AL et al (2003) MIRACLE ICD Trial Investigators Combined cardiac resynchronization and implantable cardioversion defibrillation in advanced chronic heart failure. The MIRACLE ICD trial. JAMA 289:2685–2694

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang Y, Popovic ZB, Bibevski S et al (2009) Chronic vagus nerve stimulation improves autonomic control and attenuates systemic inflammation and heart failure progression in a canine high-rate pacing model. Circ Heart Fail 2:692–699

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenskonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor weisst auf folgenden Beziehungen hin: Dr. Kuschyk ist als Referent für die Firmen BioControl, Medtronic, St Jude Medical, Impulse Dynamics und Boston Scientific tätig.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Kuschyk.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kuschyk, J., Borggrefe, M. Vagusstimulation. Herzschr. Elektrophys. 22, 21–26 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00399-011-0119-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00399-011-0119-0

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation