Literatur
Akins CW, Miller DC, Turina MI et al (2008) Guidelines for reporting mortality and morbidity after cardiac valve interventions. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 135:732–738
Brennan JM, Edwards FH, Zhao Y et al (2013) Long-term safety and effectivness of mechanical versus biological aortic valve prostheses in older patients. Results from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adults Cardiac Surgery National Database. Circulation 127:1647–1665
Falk V, Baumgartner H, Bax JJ et al (2017) 2017 ESC/EACTS guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 52:616–664
Fujita B, Ensminger S, Bauer T et al (2017) Trends in practice and outcome from 2011 to 2015 for surgical aortic valve replacement: an update from the German Aortic Valve Registry on 42,776 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezx408
Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO et al (2017) 2017 AHA/ACC focused update oft he 2014 AHA/ACC guidleines fort he management of patients with valvular heart disease. A report oft he American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 135:e1159–e1195
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Interessenkonflikt
M. Misfeld gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Misfeld, M. Mechanische oder biologische Klappenprothesen. Z Herz- Thorax- Gefäßchir 32, 302–305 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00398-018-0219-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00398-018-0219-9