Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Risikofaktoren und Präparationstechnik: passende Lösung für jeden Patienten

Risk factors and harvesting technique: appropriate solution for every patient

  • Kommentar
  • Published:
Zeitschrift für Herz-,Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1
Abb. 2

Literatur

  1. Benedetto U, Altman DG, Gerry S et al (2016) Pedicled and skeletonized single and bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts and the incidence of sternal wound complications: insights from the Arterial Revascularization Trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 152:270–276

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Boodhwani M, Lam BK, Nathan HJ et al (2006) Skeletonized internal thoracic artery harvest reduces pain and dysesthesia and improves sternal perfusion after coronary artery bypass surgery: a randomized, double-blind, within-patient comparison. Circulation 114:766–773

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kamiya H, Akhyari P, Martens A et al (2008) Sternal microcirculation after skeletonized versus pedicled harvesting of the internal thoracic artery: a randomized study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 135:32–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mamchur S, Bokhan N, Vecherskii Y et al (2015) Micromorphology of skeletonized and pedicled internal thoracic and radial arteries. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 27:115–120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Onorati F, Esposito A, Pezzo F et al (2007) Hospital outcome analysis after different techniques of left internal mammary grafts harvesting. Ann Thorac Surg 84:1912–1919

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Raja SG, Dreyfus GD (2005) Internal thoracic artery: to skeletonize or not to skeletonize? Ann Thorac Surg 79:1805–1811

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sa MP, Ferraz PE, Escobar RR et al (2013) Skeletonized versus pedicled internal thoracic artery and risk of sternal wound infection after coronary bypass surgery: meta-analysis and meta-regression of 4817 patients. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 16:849–857

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik und Poliklinik für Herz- und Thoraxchirurgie, Herzzentrum der Uniklinik Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland

    A. Sabashnikov, K. Eghbalzadeh, N. Madershahian & T. Wahlers

Authors
  1. A. Sabashnikov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K. Eghbalzadeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. N. Madershahian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. T. Wahlers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Sabashnikov.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

A. Sabashnikov, K. Eghbalzadeh, N. Madershahian und T. Wahlers geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sabashnikov, A., Eghbalzadeh, K., Madershahian, N. et al. Risikofaktoren und Präparationstechnik: passende Lösung für jeden Patienten. Z Herz- Thorax- Gefäßchir 32, 179–180 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00398-018-0215-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00398-018-0215-0

Search

Navigation