Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Analgesie und Sedierung

Analgesia and sedation

  • Perioperative Medizin
  • Published:
Zeitschrift für Herz-,Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie Aims and scope

Zusammenfassung

Patienten auf Intensivstationen sind vital bedroht und einer Vielzahl von Prozeduren und Umgebungseinflüssen ausgesetzt, die Schmerz und Stress verursachen. Sowohl Schmerz, als auch Stress beeinflussen das Outcome von Intensivpatienten negativ. Aus diesem Grund ist es notwendig, ein analgosedierendes Therapieregime zur Hand zu haben, um diese negativen Einflüsse zu minimieren. Es gibt weder das ideale Analgetikum noch das ideale Sedativum. Die Mittel der Wahl zur Analgesie sind Opioide, wie Sufentanil, Remifentanil und Fentanyl. Zur Sedierung werden vorwiegend Propofol und Benzodiazepine, in Deutschland vorwiegend Midazolam, eingesetzt. Zur Bestimmung der Tiefe der Analgosedierung stehen uns verschieden Scoringsysteme zur Verfügung.

Abstract

Patients in intensive care units (ICU) are often in vital danger and subjected to a number of procedures and environmental conditions which are known to cause stress. Both pain and stress can negatively affect patient outcome. In order to minimize these factors, analgesia or sedation is required. However, there is neither an ideal analgesic nor an ideal sedative. The drugs of choice to minimize pain are opioids such as Fentanyl, Sufentanil, and Remifentanil. For sedation, we generally use Propofol or benzodiazepines – the latter is most commonly represented by Midazolam in Germany. There are several different systems available for scoring pain level, patient alertness or possible state of delirium.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Kastrup M et al (2009) Key Performance Indicators in Intensive Care Medicine. A retrospective matched cohort study. J Int Med Res 37(5):1267–1284

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Whipple JK et al (1995) Analysis of pain management in critically ill patients. Pharmacotharapy 15:592–599

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wittbrodt ET (1999) The ideal sedation assessment tool: an elusive instrument. Crit Care (27):1384–1385

    Google Scholar 

  4. Benthuysen JL et al (1988) Prebypass hemodynamic stability of Sufentanil-O2, Fentanyl-O2 and Morphin-O2 anesthesia during cardiac surgery: a comparison of cardiovascular profiles. J Cardiothorac Anesth 2(6):749–757

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Prause A et al (2000) Respiratory depression under long-term sedation with Sufentanil, Midazolam and Clonidin has no clinical significance. Intensive Care Med 26(10):1454–1461

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Karabinis A et al (2004) Safety and efficacy of analgesia-based sedation with Remifentanil versus Standard hypnotic based regimes in intensive care unit patients with brain injuries: a randomized controlled trial. Crit Care 8(4):268–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wilhelm W et al (2003) Remifentanil an update. Anästhesist 52(6):473–494

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Frenkel C et al (1995) Pharmacokinetics and pharmakodynamics of Propofol/Fentanil infusions for sedation in ICU patients. Intensive Care Med 21(12):981–988

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fishbain DA et al (2009) Do opioids induce hyperalgesia in humans? An evidence-based structured review. Pain Med 10(5):829–839

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zöllner C et al (2008) Opioids in anesthesia. Anästhesist 57(7):729–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Whit PF et al (1982) Ketamine – Its Pharmacology and Therapeutic uses. Anethesiology 56:119–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hudetz JA (2009) Ketamine attenuates delirium after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 23(5):651–657

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Martin J et al (2007) Changes in sedation management in German intensive care units between 2002 and 2006: a national follow-up survey. Crit Care 11(6):R124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kress JP et al (2000) Daily interruption of sedative infusions in critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. N Engl J Med 342(20):1471–1477

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kollef MH (1998) The use of continuous i.v. sedation is associated with prolongation of mechanical ventilation. Chest 114(2):541–548

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hippius H et al (1988) Schlaf-Wach-Funktion. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York

  17. Weinert CR et al (2001) Sedating critically ill patients: factors affecting nurses delivery of sedative therapy. Am J Crit Care 10(3):156–163

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Usdin E et al (1983) Pharmacology of benzodiazepines. Verlag Chemie GmbH, Weinheim

  19. Young C et al (2000) Sedation in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 28(3):854–866

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Brinker M den et al (2008) One single dose of etomidate negatively influences adrenocortical performance for at least 24 h in children with meningococcal sepsis. Intensive Care Med 34(1):163–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Larsen R (2006) Anästhesie (8. Aufl.). Elsevier GmbH, Urban & Fischer Verlag

  22. L’her E et al (2008) Feasibility and potential cost benefit of routine Isoflurane sedation using an anesthetic conserving device: a prospective observational study. Respir Care 53:1295–1303

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kress JP et al (2000) Daily interruption of sedative infusions in critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. N Engl J Med 342(20):1471–1477

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Payen JF et al (2001) Assessing pain in critically ill sedated patients by using a behavioural pain Scale. Crit Care Med 29(12):2258–2263

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Spies C et al (2010) Analgesie, Sedierung und Delirmanagement in der Intensivmedizin AWMF Leitlinienregister Nr. 001/012

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. Eichler EDIC.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eichler, I. Analgesie und Sedierung. Z Herz- Thorax- Gefäßchir 25, 33–37 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00398-010-0812-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00398-010-0812-z

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation