Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Koronare Bypassoperation

Technische Aspekte

Coronary artery bypass grafting

Technical aspects

  • Operative Techniken
  • Published:
Zeitschrift für Herz-,Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie Aims and scope

Zusammenfassung

Die koronare Bypasschirurgie ist aus den Therapiekonzepten der koronaren Herzkrankheit nicht mehr wegzudenken und stellt das primäre Behandlungskonzept bei koronarer Dreigefäßerkrankung und Hauptstammstenose dar. Obwohl in den Kliniken bereits überwiegend standardisierte Operationskonzepte angewandt werden, lassen sich sowohl perioperatives Outcome als auch Langzeitergebnisse noch weiter verbessern. Bei den hier diskutierten HLM-Eingriffen stehen der erweiterte Einsatz von Arterien und eine rationale Differenzierung der operativen Techniken im Vordergrund.

Abstract

Surgical revascularisation applying coronary bypass grafting is an essential treatment option for coronary heart disease. In three vessel disease and left main stem stenosis, bypass surgery represents the primary treatment option. Even though the majority of cardiosurgical units use standardised surgical techniques, further improvement in perioperative outcome and long-term results can be achieved. Focussing on procedures under extracorporeal circulation, expanded use of arterial conduits combined with a rational differentiation of surgical techniques offers the highest potential.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5
Abb. 6
Abb. 7

Literatur

  1. Loop FD, Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM et al (1986) Influence of the internal-mammary-artery graft o 10-year survival and other cardiac events. NEJM 314:1–6

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Acar C, Jebara VA, Portophese M et al (1992) Revival of the radial artery for coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 54:652–660

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tran HM, Paterson HS, Meldrum-Hanna W, Chard RB (1998) Tunnelling versus open harvest technique in obtaining venous conduits for coronary bypass surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 14:602–606

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kiaii B, Moon BC, Massel D et al (2002) A prospective randomized trial of endoscopic versus conventional harvesting of the saphenous vein in coronary artery bypass surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 123:204–212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rousou LJ, Taylor KB, Lu X-G et al (2009) Saphenous vein conduits harvested by endoscopic technique exhibit structural and functional damage. Ann Thorac Surg 87:62–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jones EL (1991) Preparation of the internal mammary artery for coronary bypass surgery. J Card Surg 6(2):326–329

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yoshikai M, Ito T, Kamohara K, Yunoki J (2004) Endothelial integrity of ultrasonically skeletonised internal thoracic artery: morphological analysis with scanning electron microscopy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 25:208–211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zacharias A, Habib RH, Schwann TA et al (2004) Improved survival with radial artery versus vein conduits in coronary bypass surgery with left internal thoracic artery to left anterior descending artery grafting. Circulation 109:1489–1496

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lytle BW, Blackstone EH, Sabik JF et al (2004) The effect of bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting on survival during 20 postoperative years. Ann Thorac Surg 78:2005–2014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Maniar HS, Sundt TM, Barner HB et al (2002) Effect of target stenosis and location on radial artery graft patency. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 123:45–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. De Paulis R, De Notaris S, Scaffa R et al (2005) The effect of bilateral internal thoracic artery harvesting on superficial and deep sternal infection: The role of skeletonization. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 129(3):5336–5543

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bonert M, Myers JG, Fremes S et al (2002) A numerical study of blood flow in coronary artery bypass graft side-to-side. Ann Biomed Eng 30(5):599–611

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yilmaz AT, Ozal E, Barindik N et al (2002) The results of radial artery Y-graft for complete arterial revascularization. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 21:794–799

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Barner HB, Sundt TM, Bailey M, Hang Y (2001) Midterm results of complete arterial revascularization in more than 1,000 patients using an internal thoracic artery/radial artery T graft. Ann Surg 234(4):447–453

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Prof. Dr. med. Jochen Cremer, Jahrgang 1957, ist Direktor der Klinik für Herz- und Gefäßchirurgie am Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel. Er absolvierte sein Medizinstudium an der Rhein.-Westf.-Techn.-Hochschule Aachen und schloss die Promotion 1986, die Habilitation 1995 ab. 1998 erfolgte die Berufung an den Lehrstuhl für Herz- und Gefäßchirurgie an der CAU zu Kiel sowie die Ernennung zum Professor. Chirurgische Schwerpunkte in den Bereichen: komplexe Koronaroperationen, minimal-invasive Operationsverfahren, thorakale Aneurysmachirurgie und thorakale Organtransplantation.

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Cremer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cremer, J. Koronare Bypassoperation. Z Herz- Thorax- Gefäßchir 23, 87–92 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00398-009-0709-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00398-009-0709-x

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation