Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Klappenchirurgie

Wie spät ist früh genug?

Heart valve surgery. How late is early enough?

  • Übersicht
  • Published:
Zeitschrift für Herz-,Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie Aims and scope

Zusammenfassung

Leitlinien für die Behandlung von Patienten mit Klappenfehlern legen auch Operationsindikationen fest: aufgrund des Operationsrisikos möglichst spät, andererseits jedoch so früh, dass Herz und Organsysteme nicht irreversibel geschädigt sind. Da chirurgische Weiterentwicklungen das Risiko reduzieren, müssen die Empfehlungen stetig hinterfragt werden. Konsens besteht bei den Op-Indikationen symptomatischer Vitien. Dennoch wird im Falle der Aortenklappenstenose die Operation, die minimalinvasiv besonders risikoarm erfolgen kann, vielen Patienten vorenthalten. In der Diskussion ist die Behandlung asymptomatischer Fälle. Die leitliniengerechte Anwendung von Belastungstests wird zu selten genutzt. Für die asymptomatische Aortenklappenstenose mehren sich die Hinweise, dass ein Teil der Patienten von einer frühzeitigen Operation profitiert, wobei die Identifizierung eben dieser Patienten schwierig bleibt. Fortschritte bei der Rekonstruktion undichter Mitral- oder Aortenklappen haben zumindest für die Mitralklappe klar dazu geführt, dass eine Operationsindikation früher gestellt wird; für die Aortenklappe deutet sich eine ähnliche Einschätzung an. Die chirurgische Expertise entwickelt sich zu einem wichtigen Kriterium für eine Operationsentscheidung.

Abstract

Indications for surgery form part of the guidelines for the treatment of valvular heart disease. The goal is to avoid risk associated with surgery as long as possible without reaching the point of irreversible damage to the heart and other organs. Since improvements of surgical techniques have reduced the operative risk these guidelines need revision periodically. Treatment of symptomatic patients is mainly consented. Despite this consensus surgery is denied to a significant number of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Treatment of patients with severe but asymtomatic valvular heart disease is under debate. Excercise testing to detect surgical candidates is recommended but rarely performed. Evidence is evolving that subgroups of patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis benefit from early surgery, but identification of these patients remains difficult. Advances in surgical reconstruction of leaking mitral or aortic valves have led to recommendations for earlier surgery of mitral insufficiencies; data generation for reconstructive surgery of the aortic valve is underway. Surgical experience with these techniques is of major importance in the process of deciding when to operate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Aicher D, Langer F, Adam O, Tscholl D, Lausberg H, Schäfers HJ (2007) Cusp repair in aortic valve reconstruction: does the technique affect stability? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 134(6):1533–1538

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Amato MCM, Moffa PJ, Werner KE (2001) Treatment decisions in asymptomatic aortic valve stenosis: role of exercise testing, Heart 86:381–386

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines; Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists; Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions; Society of Thoracic Surgeons, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Kanu C, de Leon AC Jr, Faxon DP, Freed MD, Gaasch WH, Lytle BW, Nishimura RA, O’Gara PT, O’Rourke RA, Otto CM, Shah PM, Shanewise JS, Smith SC Jr, Jacobs AK, Adams CD, Anderson JL, Antman EM, Faxon DP, Fuster V, Halperin JL, Hiratzka LF, Hunt SA, Lytle BW, Nishimura R, Page RL, Riegel B (2006) ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (writing committee to revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease): developed in collaboration with the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists: endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation 114(5):e84–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. American College of Cardiology; American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to revise the 1998 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease); Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K, de Leon AC Jr, Faxon DP, Freed MD, Gaasch WH, Lytle BW, Nishimura RA, O’Gara PT, O’Rourke RA, Otto CM, Shah PM, Shanewise JS, Smith SC Jr, Jacobs AK, Adams CD, Anderson JL, Antman EM, Fuster V, Halperin JL, Hiratzka LF, Hunt SA, Lytle BW, Nishimura R, Page RL, Riegel B (2006) ACC/ AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (writing Committee to Revise the 1998 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease) developed in collaboration with the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol 48(3):e1–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bakir I, Casselman FP, Wellens F, Jeanmart H, De Geest R, Degrieck I, Van Praet F, Vermeulen Y, Vanermen H (2006) Minimally invasive versus standard approach aortic valve replacement: a study in 506 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 81(5):1599–1604

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bonow RO (2005) Robert Ogden Bonow: A conversation with the editor on valvular heart disease and indications for operative intervention. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) ;18(1):56–64

    Google Scholar 

  7. Borer JS, Bonow RO (2003) Contemporary approach to aortic and mitral regurgitation. Circulation; 108(20):2432–2438

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bozbuga N, Erentug V, Kirali K, Akinci E, Isik O, Yakut C (2004) Midterm results of aortic valve repair with the pericardial cusp extension technique in rheumatic valve disease. Ann Thorac Surg 77(4):1272–1276

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Brown ML, Pellikka PA, Schaff HV, Scott CG, Mullany CJ, Sundt TM, Dearani JA, Daly RC, Orszulak TA (2008) The benefits of early valve replacement in asymptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 135(2):308–315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Das P, Rimington H, Chambers J (2005) Exercise testing to stratify risk in aortic stenosis, Eur Heart J 26, 1309–1313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Daniel WG, Baumgartner H, Gohlke-Bärwolf C, Hanrath P, Horstkotte D, Koch KC, Mügge A, Schäfers HJ, Flachskampf FA (2006) Klappenvitien im Erwachsenenalter, Clin Res Cardiol 95(11):620–641

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gillinov AM, Cosgrove DM. (1999) Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: mini-sternotomy with extended transseptal approach. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 11(3):206–211

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Grossi EA, Schwartz CF, Yu PJ, Jorde UP, Crooke GA, Grau JB, Ribakove GH, Baumann FG, Ursumanno P, Culliford AT, Colvin SB, Galloway AC (2008) Highrisk aortic valve replacement: are the outcomes as bad as predicted? Ann Thorac Surg 85(1):102–106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Haan CK, Cabral CI, Conetta DA, Coombs LP, Edwards FH (2004) Selecting patients with mitral regurgitation and left ventricular dysfunction for isolated mitral valve surgery Ann Thorac Surg 78 (3), 820–825

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Iung B, Cachier A, Baron G et al (2005) Decision making in elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis: why are so many denied surgery? Eur Heart J 26, 2714–2720

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kallenbach K, Hagl C, Walles T, Leyh RG, Pethig K, Haverich A, Harringer W (2002) Results of valvesparing aortic root reconstruction in 158 consecutive patients. Ann Thorac Surg 74(6):2026–2032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Law A, Chan KL (2007) Surgical referral in symptomatic mitral regurgitation: greater compliance with guidelines is needed. European Heart Journal 28(11):1281–1288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lund O, Nielsen TT, Emmertsen K (1996) Mortality and worsening of prognostic profile during waiting time for valve replacement in aortic stenosis, Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 44, 289–295

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mihaljevic T, Cohn LH, Unic D, Aranki SF, Couper GS, Byrne JG (2004) One thousand minimally invasive valve operations: early and late results. Ann Surg 240(3):529–534

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nkomo VT, Gardin JM, Skelton TN, Gottdiener JS, Scott CG, Enriquez-Sarano M (2006) Burden of valvular heart diseases: a population-based study. Lancet 368(9540):1005–1011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pai RG, Kapoor N, Bansal R, Varadarajan P (2006) Malignant Natural History of Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis: Benefit of Aortic Valve Replacement Ann Thorac Surg 83(6):2116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pellikka PE, Sarano ME, Nishimura RA et al (2005) Outcome of 622 adults with asymptomatic, hemodynamically significant aortic stenosis during prolonged follow-up, Circulation 111, 3290–3295

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pereira JJ, Mauer MS, Bashir B, Afridi I, Blackstone EH, Stewart W, McCarthy PM, Thomas JD, Asher CR (2002) Survival after aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis with low transvalvular gradients and severe left ventricular dysfunction. J Am Coll Card 39 (8), 1356–1363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Piper C, Bergemann R, Schulte HD, Koerfer R, Horstkotte D (2003) Can progression of valvar aortic stenosis be predicted accurately? Ann Thorac Surg. Sep;76(3):676–680; discussion 680

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Roberts WC, Ko JM, Garner WL, Filardo G, Henry AC, Hebeler RF Jr, Matter GJ, Hamman BL (2007) Valve structure and survival in octogenarians having aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis (+/– aortic regurgitation) with versus without coronary artery bypass grafting at a single US medical center (1993 to 2005) Am J Cardiol 100(3):489–495

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rosenhek R, Binder T, Porenta G et al (2000) Predictors of outcome in severe asymptomatic aortic stenosis, N Engl J Med 343, 611–617

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Scognamiglio R, Negut C, Palisi M, Fasoli G, Dalla- Volta S (2005) Long-term survival and functional results after aortic valve replacement in asymptomatic patients with chronic severe aortic regurgitation and left ventricular dysfunction J Am Coll Cardiol 45(7):1025–1030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Toledano K, Rudski LG, Huynh T, Beique F, Sampalis J, Morin J (2007) Mitral regurgitation: determinants of referral for cardiac surgery by Canadian cardiologists. Can J Cardiol 23:209–214

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Tjang YS, van Hees Y, Körfer R, Grobbee DE, van der Heijden GJ (2007) Predictors of mortality after aortic valve replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 32(3):469–474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Tornos P, Sambola A, Permanyer-Miralda G, Evangelista A, Gomez Z, Soler-Soler J (2006) Long-Term Outcome of Surgically Treated Aortic Regurgitation Influence of Guideline Adherence Toward Early Surgery. J Am Coll Card 47 (5), 1012–1017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Tribouilloy CM, Enriquez-Sarano M, Schaff HV, Orszulak TA, Bailey KR, Tajik AJ, Frye RL (1999) Impact of preoperative symptoms on survival after surgical correction of organic mitral regurgitation: rationale for optimizing surgical indications. Circulation 99:400–405

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Vahanian A, Baumgartner H, Bax J, Butchart E, Dion R, Filippatos G, Flachskampf F, Hall R, Iung B, Kasprzak J, Nataf P, Tornos P, Torracca L, Wenink A (2007) Task Force on the Management of Valvular Hearth Disease of the European Society of Cardiology; ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease: The Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 28(2):230–268

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wahi S, Haluska B, Pasquet A, Case C, Rimmerman CM, Marwick TH. (2000) Exercise echocardiography predicts development of left ventricular dysfunction in medically and surgically treated patients with asymptomatic severe aortic regurgitation. Heart 84(6):606–614

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manfred Dahm FECTS.

Additional information

Prof. Dr. Manfred Dahm, Jahrgang 1960, ist leitender Oberarzt und Facharzt für Chirurgie, Gefäßchirurgie, Thorax- und Kardiovaskularchirurgie an der Klinik und Poliklinik für Herz-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität in Mainz. Dort hatte er von 1978 bis 1984 sein Studium absolviert. 1986 bis 1987 war Dahm Research fellow am Albert-Einstein-College, New York. Er habilitierte sich 1993 und hat seit 1999 eine Professur inne.

Interessenkonflikt. Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dahm, M., Münzel, T. & Vahl, C. Klappenchirurgie. Z Herz- Thorax- Gefäßchir 22, 126–131 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00398-008-0639-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00398-008-0639-z

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation