Abstract
Using pressure-sensitive films, the normal stress distribution is measured in suspensions of glass spheres in a Newtonian liquid undergoing constant-force squeeze flow. At volume fractions of solids up to 0.55, the normal stress distribution is independent of volume fraction and almost identical to the parabolic pressure distribution predicted for Newtonian fluids. However, at higher volume fractions, the normal stresses become an order of magnitude larger near the center and very low beyond that region. At these high volume fractions, the normal stresses decrease in the outer regions and increase in the inner regions as the squeezing proceeds. The normal stress distribution that results when the glass spheres without any fluid are subjected to squeeze flow is very similar to that for suspensions with volume fractions above 0.55, suggesting that the cause for the drastic changes in the normal stress distribution is the jamming of the particles in the suspension.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bird RB, Stewart WE, Lightfoot EN (2002) Transport phenomena, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York, p 110
Chaari F, Racineux G, Poitou A, Chaouche M (2003) Rheological behavior of sewage sludge and strain-induced dewatering. Rheol Acta 42:273–279
Collomb J, Chaari F, Chaouche M (2004) Squeeze flow of concentrated suspensions of spheres in Newtonian and shear-thinning fluids. J Rheol 48:405–416
Delhaye N, Poitou A, Chaouche M (2000) Squeeze flow of highly concentrated suspensions of spheres. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 94:67–74
Engmann J, Servais C, Burbidge AS (2005) Squeeze flow theory and applications to rheometry: a review. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 132:1–27
Estellé P, Lanos C, Perrot A, Servais C (2006) Slipping zone location in squeeze flow. Rheol Acta 45:444–448
Happel J, Brenner H (1986) Low Reynolds number hydrodynamics, 2nd edn. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht
Mascia S, Wilson DI (2007) Rheology of concentrated granular suspensions undergoing squeeze flow. J Rheol 51:493–515
Mascia S, Wilson DI (2008) Biaxial extensional rheology of granular suspensions: the HBP (Herschel–Bulkley for pastes) model. J Rheol 52:981–998
Meeten GH (2004) Effects of plate roughness in squeeze-flow rheometry. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 124:51–60
Meeten GH (2007) Radial filtration during constant-force squeeze flow of soft solids. Rheol Acta 46:803–813
Nadai A (1963) Theory of flow and fracture of solids, vol II. McGraw-Hill, New York
O’Donovan EJ, Tanner RI (1984) Numerical study of the Bingham squeeze film problem. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 15:75–83
Poitou A, Racineux G (2001) A squeezing experiment showing binder migration in concentrated suspensions. J Rheol 45:609–625
Sherwood JD (2002) Liquid-solid relative motion during squeeze flow of pastes. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 104:1–32
Smyrnaios DN, Tsamopoulos JA (2001) Squeeze flow of Bingham plastics. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 100:165–190
Yates NM, Barigou M, Fryer PJ, Moore SR (2001) Squeeze flow of food pastes. In: 6th World congress of chemical engineering, Melbourne, Australia
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Rick Blunk of General Motors for suggesting the use of pressure-sensitive films for this purpose. We are also grateful to Ian Wilson and Sarah Rough of the Department of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology at the University of Cambridge for their helpful comments on an earlier draft of this paper. This work was partially supported by the NSF I/UCRC Center for Fuel Cells and the NSF REU program at the University of South Carolina.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nikkhoo, M., Khodabandehlou, K., Brozovsky, L. et al. Normal stress distribution in highly concentrated suspensions undergoing squeeze flow. Rheol Acta 52, 155–163 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00397-013-0681-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00397-013-0681-y