Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mechanistic study of drag reduction in turbulent pipeline flow over anionic polymer and surfactant mixtures

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
Colloid and Polymer Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The mixed aqueous solutions of anionic surfactant sodium dodecyl sulfate with polymer polyacrylamide of various kinds, i.e., cationic, anionic, nonionic, and zwitterion, were firstly tested to study their synergistic effect on drag reduction performance. The optimal combination of sodium dodecyl sulfate with anionic polyacrylamide was confirmed due to their strong hydrophobic interaction and electrostatic repulsion caused by the same charge. The surface tension, conductivity, and viscosity of pure surfactant solution and mixed solutions at different surfactant concentrations with anionic polymer of certain concentration were tested, and their drag reduction behavior in pipe flow was also investigated experimentally. It turns out that drag reduction performance acquired from the combination of anionic surfactant and anionic polyacrylamide is better than either of the single additive, especially under high shear rate. For the mixtures, the degree of drag reduction is strongly dependent on the concentration of SDS and more pronounced in the high Reynolds number range. The best drag reduction performance is obtained for the SDS concentration around the polymer saturation point. Our work should be of value for the drag reduction in the application such as shale gas fracturing and various fluid transports.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Virk PS (1975) Drag reduction fundamentals. AICHE J 21(4):625–656

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lumley JL Drag reduction in turbulent flow by polymer additives. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 7.1(2010)

  3. Ohlendorf D, Interthal W, Hoffmann H (1986) Surfactant systems for drag reduction: physico-chemical properties and rheological behaviour. Rheol Acta 25(5):468–486

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lucas EF, Mansur CRE, Spinelli L, Queirós YGC (2009) Polymer science applied to petroleum production. Pure Appl Chem 81(3):473–494

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Yoon H, Sik HHC (2006) Drag reduction in turbulent channel flow with periodically arrayed heating and cooling strips. Phys Fluids 18(2):1093

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Harwigsson I, Hellsten M (1996) Environmentally acceptable drag-reducing surfactants for district heating and cooling. J Am Oil Chem Soc 73(7):921–928

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Obry M (1980) Polymer drag reduction in large pipes and sewers: results of recent field trials. J Rheol 24(5):667–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Figueredo RCR, Sabadini E (2003) Firefighting foam stability: the effect of the drag reducer poly (ethylene) oxide. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 215 1:77–86

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Abubakar A (2014) Roles of drag reducing polymers in single- and multi-phase flows. Chem Eng Res Des 92(11):2153–2181

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rouse PE, Sittel K (1953) Viscoelastic properties of dilute polymer solutions. J Appl Phys 24(6):690–696

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Yoshizaki H (1989) Ultrasonic viscoelasticity and excess absorption in polymer solution. Polym J 21(11):905–913

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jinjia W, Chonghai H, Na XU (2016) Research progress concerning turbulent drag reduction of surfactant solution. Chem Ind & Eng Pro (China)

  13. Mohsenipour AA, Pal R, Prajapati K (2013) Effect of cationic surfactant addition on the drag reduction behaviour of anionic polymer solutions. Can J Chem Eng 91(1):181

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Dongjie L et al (2018) Molecular dynamics simulation of self-assembly and viscosity behavior of PAM and CTAC in salt-added solutions. J Mol Liq 268:131–139

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mohsenipour A, Asghar R (2013) Drag reduction in turbulent pipeline flow of mixed nonionic polymer and cationic surfactant systems. Can J Chem Eng 91(1):190–201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Anthony O, Zana R (1996) Interactions between water-soluble polymers and surfactants: effect of the polymer hydrophobicity. 1. Hydrophilic polyelectrolytes. Langmuir. 12(8):1967–1975

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Thuresson K (1995) Effect of surfactant on structural and thermodynamic properties of aqueous solutions of hydrophobically modified ethyl (hydroxyethyl) cellulose. Langmuir 11(10):3730–3736

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Deo P et al (2007) Interactions of a hydrophobically modified polymer with oppositely charged surfactants. Langmuir. 23(11):5906–5913

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Deo P (2003) Interactions of hydrophobically modified polyelectrolytes with surfactants of the same charge. Langmuir. 19(26):10747–10752

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Parathakkatt S, George J, Sankarakutty SM, Sreejith L (2009) Polymer induced struc-tures in cetylpyridinium chloride–octanol micellar system. J Polym Res 16(5):577–582

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu D, Wang Q, Wei J (2018) Experimental study on drag reduction performance of mixed polymer and surfactant solutions. Chem Eng Res Des

  22. Malcher T, Gzylmalcher B (2012) Influence of polymer-surfactant aggregates on fluid flow. Bioelectrochemistry 87 10:42–49

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mohsenipour AA, Pal R (2013) The role of surfactants in mechanical degradation of drag-reducing polymers. Bioelectrochemistry 52(3):1291–1302

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Mohsenipour AA, Pal R (2013) Synergistic effects of anionic surfactant and nonionic polymer additives on drag reduction. Chem Eng Commun 200(7):24

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Nagarajan R (1980) Thermodtnamics of surfactant-polymer interactions in dilute aqueous solutions. Chem Phys Lett 76(2):282–286

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ruckenstein E, Huber G, Hoffmann H (1987) Surfactant aggregation in the presence of polymers. Langmuir. 3(3):382–387

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Monteux C (2007) Determining the mechanical response of particle-laden fluid interfaces using surface pressure isotherms and bulk pressure measurements of droplets. Phys Chem Chem Phys 9(48):6344–6350

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Goddard ED (2002) Polymer/surfactant interaction: interfacial aspects. J Colloid Interface Sci 256(1):228–235

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. YU B (2004) Numerical and experimental investigation of turbulent characteristics in a drag-reducing flow with surfactant additives. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 25(6):961–974

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Biggs S, Selb J, Candau F (1992) Effect of surfactant on the solution properties of hydrophobically modified polyacrylamide. Langmuir. 8(3):838–847

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Li FC (2008) Experimental study of drag-reduction mechanism for a dilute surfactant solution flow. Int J Heat Mass Tranf 51(3):835–843

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Lin Z (2016) Comparison of the effects of methyl- and chloro-substituted salicylate counterions on drag reduction and rheological behavior and micellar formation of a cationic surfactant. Rheol Acta 55(2):117–123

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Sher I, Hetsroni G (2008) A mechanistic model of turbulent drag reduction by additives. Chem Eng Sci 63(7):1771–1778

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Liberatore MW (2004) Turbulent drag reduction of polyacrylamide solutions: effect of degradation on molecular weight distribution. J Non-Newton Fluid 123(2–3):175–183

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Krstonošić V, Milanović M, Dokić L (2019) Application of different techniques in the determination of xanthan gum-SDS and xanthan gum-tween 80 interaction. Food Hydrocoll 87:108–118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Liu Z-y (2017) Impact of the microstructure of polymer drag reducer on slick-water fracturing. Geofluids. 2017:1–8

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was financial supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51776165, 51888103) and Shanxi Science & Technology Co-ordination & Innovation Project (Contract No. 2017ZDXM-GY-067). This work was also supported by the China Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Multiphase Flow in Power Engineering & International Research Center for Renewable Energy, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, 710049, China

    Yanlin Chai, Jiafeng Geng, Jiaxin Pan, Yalong Huang & Dengwei Jing

  2. Oil and Gas Technology Research Institute of Changqing Oilfield Company, Xi’an, 710018, China

    Xianwen Li

Authors
  1. Yanlin Chai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xianwen Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jiafeng Geng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jiaxin Pan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yalong Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Dengwei Jing
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dengwei Jing.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chai, Y., Li, X., Geng, J. et al. Mechanistic study of drag reduction in turbulent pipeline flow over anionic polymer and surfactant mixtures. Colloid Polym Sci 297, 1025–1035 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00396-019-04525-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00396-019-04525-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation