Abstract
QT dispersion is considered to reflect nonhomogeneity of ventricular repolarization. The autonomic nervous system modulates QT interval duration, but the effect may not be spatially homogenous. Magnetocardiography (MCG) registers the weak magnetik fields generated by myocardial electric currents with high localizing accuracy. We studied the effect of rapid cardiovascular autonomic nervous adjustment on QT dispersion in MCG. Ten healthy male volunteers were monitored during deep breathing, the Valsalva maneuver, sustained handgrip, hyperventilation, the cold pressor test and mental stress. 67 MCG channels and 12 ECG leads were recorded simultaneously. A computer algorithm was used for QT interval measurements. QT dispersion was defined as maximum – minimum or standard deviation of the QTpeak and QTend intervals. In MCG the QTend dispersion increased during deep inspiration compared with deep expiration (96±19 ms v 73±27 ms, p=0.05). Magnetic QT dispersion tended to increase during the bradycardia phase of the Valsalva maneuver, but the change was obvious only for QTend (55±26 ms v 76±29 ms, p<0.05) Other tests had no significant effect on QT dispersion, not even the cold pressor test, although it causes strong sympathetic activation. Magnetic and electric QTpeak and QTend intervals correlated closely (r=0.93 and 0.91), whereas the QT dispersion measures showed no correlation. In conclusion, magnetic QT dispersion is not modified by rapid changes in autonomic tone, but maneuvers involving deep respiratory efforts and changes in ventricular loading affect QT dispersion measurements.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Received: 4 April 2000 Returned for revision: 2 May 2000 Revision received: 20 June 2000 Accepted: 10 July 2000
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Haapalahti, P., Mäkijärvi, M., Korhonen, P. et al. Magnetocardiographic QT dispersion during cardiovascular autonomic function tests. Basic Res Cardiol 95, 424–430 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s003950070043
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s003950070043