Correction to: European Journal of Nutrition

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-024-03366-2

In the original version of this article, in the abstract, second sentence of the result sections which previously read.

One cluster, including twenty percent of the individuals in the sample was identified as a “best compromise” diet with the highest diet quality and the second lowest environmental impacts of all clusters, except for freshwater eutrophication.

Should have read

One cluster, including eighteen percent of the individuals in the sample was identified as a “best compromise” diet with the highest diet quality and the second lowest environmental impacts of all clusters, except for freshwater eutrophication.