Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of a prebiotic formulation on the composition of the faecal microbiota of people with functional constipation

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
European Journal of Nutrition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Prebiotics are defined as substances which selectively promote beneficial gut microbes leading to a health benefit for the host. Limited trials have been carried out investigating their effect on the microbiota composition of individuals afflicted by functional constipation with equivocal outcomes. In a 21-day randomised, controlled clinical trial involving 61 adults with functional constipation, a prebiotic formulation with partially hydrolysed guar gum and acacia gum as its main ingredients, significantly increased complete spontaneous bowel motions in the treatment group. This follow-up exploratory analysis investigated whether the prebiotic was associated with changes to the composition, richness, and diversity of the faecal microbiota.

Methods

Participants provided a faecal specimen at baseline and on day 21 of the intervention period. Whole genome metagenomic shotgun sequencing comprehensively assessed taxonomic and functional composition of the microbiota.

Results

Linear mixed effects regression models adjusted for potential confounders showed a significant reduction in species richness of 28.15 species (95% CI − 49.86, − 6.43) and Shannon diversity of 0.29 units (95% CI − 0.56, − 0.02) over the trial period in the prebiotic group. These changes were not observed in the control group, and functional composition was unchanged in both groups.

Conclusion

In adults with functional constipation, the intake of a prebiotic formulation was associated with a decline of species richness and Shannon diversity. Further research regarding the associations between prebiotics and the composition and function of the gut microbiota is warranted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated for this study are available on request to the corresponding author.

References

  1. Black CJ, Ford AC (2018) Chronic idiopathic constipation in adults: epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis and clinical management. Med J Aust 209(2):86–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. The Rome Foundation (2016) Rome IV criteria. https://theromefoundation.org/rome-iv/rome-iv-criteria/. Accessed 02/04/2022 2022

  3. Turnbaugh PJ, Ley RE, Hamady M, Fraser-Liggett CM, Knight R, Gordon JI (2007) The human microbiome project. Nature 449(7164):804–810. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06244

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Lloyd-Price J, AbuAli G, Huttenhower C (2016) The healthy human microbiome. Genome Med 8(1):51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-016-0307-y

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Vandeputte D, Falony G, Vieira-Silva S, Tito RY, Joossens M, Raes J (2016) Stool consistency is strongly associated with gut microbiota richness and composition, enterotypes and bacterial growth rates. Gut 65(1):57–62. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309618

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gibson GR, Hutkins R, Sanders ME, Prescott SL, Reimer RA, Salminen SJ, Scott K, Stanton C, Swanson KS, Cani PD, Verbeke K, Reid G (2017) Expert consensus document: the International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) consensus statement on the definition and scope of prebiotics. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 14(8):491–502. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2017.75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. British Nutrition Foundation (2022) The science of fibre. https://www.nutrition.org.uk/healthy-sustainable-diets/starchy-foods-sugar-and-fibre/fibre/?level=Health%20professional. Accessed May 07 2022

  8. Plamada D, Vodnar DC (2021) Polyphenols-gut microbiota interrelationship: a transition to a new generation of prebiotics. Nutrients. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14010137

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Azpiroz F, Molne L, Mendez S, Nieto A, Manichanh C, Mego M, Accarino A, Santos J, Sailer M, Theis S, Guarner F (2017) Effect of chicory-derived inulin on abdominal sensations and bowel motor function. J Clin Gastroenterol 51(7):619–625. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000000723

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Slavin J, Feirtag J (2011) Chicory inulin does not increase stool weight or speed up intestinal transit time in healthy male subjects. Food Funct 2(1):72–77. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0fo00101e

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sakai Y, Seki N, Hamano H, Ochi H, Abe F, Shimizu F, Masuda K, Iino H (2019) A study of the prebiotic effect of lactulose at low dosages in healthy Japanese women. Biosci Microbiota Food Health 38(2):69–72

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Walton GE, van den Heuvel EG, Kosters MH, Rastall RA, Tuohy KM, Gibson GR (2012) A randomised crossover study investigating the effects of galacto-oligosaccharides on the faecal microbiota in men and women over 50 years of age. Brit J Nutr 107(10):1466–1475. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114511004697

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Erhardt R, Harnett JE, Steels E, Steadman KJ (2023) Functional constipation and the effect of prebiotics on the gut microbiota: a review. Br J Nutr 130(6):1015–1023. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114522003853

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Steels E, Erhardt R, Harnett JE, Vigar V, Steadman KJ (2023) Efficacy of a prebiotic formulation for treatment of functional constipation and associated gastrointestinal symptoms in adults: a randomised controlled trial. AIMED 10(2):43–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aimed.2023.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pribyl AL, Parks DH, Angel NZ, Boyd JA, Hasson AG, Fang L, MacDonald SL, Wills BA, Wood DLA, Krause L, Tyson GW, Hugenholtz P (2021) Critical evaluation of faecal microbiome preservation using metagenomic analysis. ISME Commun 1(1):s43705-43021-00014-43702. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43705-021-00014-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Parks DH, Rigato F, Vera-Wolf P, Krause L, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW, Wood DLA (2021) Evaluation of the Microba community profiler for taxonomic profiling of metagenomic datasets from the human gut microbiome. Front Microbiol 12:643682. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.643682

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. GTDB (2022) Genome Taxonomy DataBase,. Australian Centre for Ecogenomics. https://gtdb.ecogenomic.org/. 2022

  18. Uni Prot (2022) Uni Ref. Uniprot consortium. https://www.uniprot.org/help/uniref. Accessed Sep 28 2022

  19. Hugenholtz F, Tyson G (2008) Metagenomics. Nature 455(25):481–483

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Food Works (2022) Foodworks 10 Professional. Xyris. https://xyris.com.au/products/foodworks-10-professional/. Accessed Oct 22 2022

  21. Statology (2022) Shannon diversity index. Statology. https://www.statology.org/shannon-diversity-index/. Accessed Oct 14 2022

  22. Molenberghs G, Verbeke G (2000) Linear mixed models for longitudinal data. Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0300-6

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Curran-Everett D (2000) Multiple comparisons: philosophies and illustrations. Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol 279:R1–R8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Danneskiold-Samsoe NB, de Freitas D, Queiroz Barros H, Santos R, Bicas JL, Cazarin CBB, Madsen L, Kristiansen K, Pastore GM, Brix S, Marostica Junior MR (2019) Interplay between food and gut microbiota in health and disease. Food Res Int 115:23–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2018.07.043

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ghosh TS, Rampelli S, Jeffery IB, Santoro A, Neto M, Capri M, Giampieri E, Jennings A, Candela M, Turroni S, Zoetendal EG, Hermes GDA, Elodie C, Meunier N, Brugere CM, Pujos-Guillot E, Berendsen AM, De Groot L, Feskins EJM, Kaluza J, Pietruszka B, Bielak MJ, Comte B, Maijo-Ferre M, Nicoletti C, De Vos WM, Fairweather-Tait S, Cassidy A, Brigidi P, Franceschi C, O’Toole PW (2020) Mediterranean diet intervention alters the gut microbiome in older people reducing frailty and improving health status: the NU-AGE 1-year dietary intervention across five European countries. Gut 69(7):1218–1228. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319654

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Laudadio I, Fulci V, Palone F, Stronati L, Cucchiara S, Carissimi C (2018) Quantitative assessment of shotgun metagenomics and 16S rDNA amplicon sequencing in the study of human gut microbiome. OMICS 22(4):248–254. https://doi.org/10.1089/omi.2018.0013

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Asnicar F, Leeming ER, Dimidi E, Mazidi M, Franks PW, Al Khatib H, Valdes AM, Davies R, Bakker E, Francis L, Chan A, Gibson R, Hadjigeorgiou G, Wolf J, Spector TD, Segata N, Berry SE (2021) Blue poo: impact of gut transit time on the gut microbiome using a novel marker. Gut 70(9):1665–1674. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2020-323877

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gilbert JA, Blaser MJ, Caporaso JG, Jansson JK, Lynch SV, Knight R (2018) Current understanding of the human microbiome. Nat Med 24(4):392–400. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.4517

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Xu Z, Knight R (2015) Dietary effects on human gut microbiome diversity. Brit J Nutr 113(Suppl):S1-5. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114514004127

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Singh RK, Chang HW, Yan D, Lee KM, Ucmak D, Wong K, Abrouk M, Farahnik B, Nakamura M, Zhu TH, Bhutani T, Liao W (2017) Influence of diet on the gut microbiome and implications for human health. J Transl Med 15(1):73. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-017-1175-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Amos GCA, Logan A, Anwar S, Fritzsche M, Mate R, Bleazard T, Rijpkema S (2020) Developing standards for the microbiome field. Microbiome 8(1):98. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-020-00856-3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Beghini F, McIver LJ, Blanco-Miguez A, Dubois L, Asnicar F, Maharjan S, Mailyan A, Manghi P, Scholz M, Thomas AM, Valles-Colomer M, Weingart G, Zhang Y, Zolfo M, Huttenhower C, Franzosa EA, Segata N (2021) Integrating taxonomic, functional, and strain-level profiling of diverse microbial communities with bioBakery 3. Elife 10:eLife.65088. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.65088

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Rene Erhardt was supported by a postgraduate scholarship of the University of Queensland.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Pharmacy, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia

    Rene Erhardt, Elizabeth Steels, Meng-Wong Taing & Kathryn J. Steadman

  2. Evidence Sciences Pty. Ltd., New Farm, Australia

    Elizabeth Steels

  3. School of Pharmacy, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

    Joanna E. Harnett

  4. School of Pharmacy, The University of Queensland, 20 Cornwall Street , Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia

    Rene Erhardt

Authors
  1. Rene Erhardt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elizabeth Steels
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Joanna E. Harnett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Meng-Wong Taing
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kathryn J. Steadman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

R. Erhardt contributed to the conception, design, and interpretation of the research. MW. Taing developed the LMER models. All authors contributed to the design and drafting of the manuscript. All authors critically revised the manuscript, agree to be fully accountable for ensuring the integrity and accuracy of the work, and read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rene Erhardt.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the guidelines of the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia. Ethics approval was obtained from the National Institute of Integrative Medicine, Human Research Ethics Committee (approval number 0075E_2020) and ratified by the Office of Research Ethics of The University of Queensland (2020002481 / 0074E_2020). The trial was registered with the Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12620001247965.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 130 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Erhardt, R., Steels, E., Harnett, J.E. et al. Effects of a prebiotic formulation on the composition of the faecal microbiota of people with functional constipation. Eur J Nutr 63, 777–784 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-023-03292-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-023-03292-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation