Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison between digital and paper urine color to assess hydration status

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
European Journal of Nutrition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to investigate associations between digital urine color and paper urine color with other urine indices to assess hydration status.

Methods

Twelve male subjects (mean ± standard deviation; age, 26 ± 8 years; body mass, 57.8 ± 5.3 kg; height, 177.5 ± 8.9 cm; VO2max, 57.8 ± 5.8 ml·kg−1·min−1) performed four exercise trials in the heat. Before and following exercise trials, subjects provide urine samples. Urine samples were measured using a digital urine color chart on a portable device screen. Urine samples were also assessed with urine specific gravity (USG), urine osmolality (UOsmo), and a validated paper urine color chart.

Results

There were extremely large associations found between digital urine color and paper urine color (r = 0.926, p < 0.001). Correlation coefficients showing associations with USG and UOsmo were similar between digital urine color (USG, r = 0.695, p < 0.001; UOsmo, r = 0.555, p < 0.001) and paper urine color (USG, r = 0.713, p < 0.001; UOsmo, r = 0.570, p < 0.001). Bland–Altman analysis indicated that no proportional bias was observed between digital and paper urine colors (bias, − 0.148; SD of bias, 0.492; 95% LOA, − 1.11, 0.817; p = 0.094).

Conclusions

Strong associations were found between digital and paper urine colors with no proportional bias. Furthermore, the degree of associations with USG and UOsmo was similar between digital and paper urine color. These results indicate that digital urine color is a useful tool to assess hydration status and this method could be used as an alternative method to using paper urine color.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Copyright 2022 University of Connecticut and CamelBak Products, LLC. All rights reserved

Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. Sawka MN, Burke LM, Eichner ER et al (2007) American college of sports medicine position stand. Exercise and fluid replacement. Med Sci Sports Exerc 39:377–390. https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0b013e31802ca597

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Judelson DA, Maresh CM, Anderson JM et al (2007) Hydration and muscular performance: does fluid balance affect strength, power and high-intensity endurance? Sports Med 37:907–921

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Baker LB, Dougherty KA, Chow M, Kenney WL (2007) Progressive dehydration causes a progressive decline in basketball skill performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 39:1114–1123. https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0b013e3180574b02

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Armstrong LE, Maresh CM, Castellani JW et al (1994) Urinary indices of hydration status. Int J Sport Nutr 4:265–279

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Armstrong LE, Soto JA, Hacker FT et al (1998) Urinary indices during dehydration, exercise, and rehydration. Int J Sport Nutr 8:345–355

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Armstrong LE (2007) Assessing hydration status: the elusive gold standard. J Am Coll Nutr 26:575S-584S

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. McKenzie AL, Muñoz CX, Armstrong LE (2015) Accuracy of urine color to detect equal to or greater than 2% body mass loss in men. J Athl Train 50:1306–1309. https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-51.1.03

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Kavouras SA, Johnson EC, Bougatsas D et al (2016) Validation of a urine color scale for assessment of urine osmolality in healthy children. Eur J Nutr 55:907–915. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-015-0905-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Balogh EP, Miller BT, Ball JR et al (2015) Technology and tools in the diagnostic process. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hopkins WG, Marshall SW, Batterham AM, Hanin J (2009) Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise science. Med Sci Sports Exerc 41:3–13. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e31818cb278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kostelnik SB, Davy KP, Hedrick VE et al (2021) The validity of urine color as a hydration biomarker within the general adult population and athletes: a systematic review. J Am Coll Nutr 40:172–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/07315724.2020.1750073

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank undergraduate students for their help during data collection and data cleaning. Furthermore, the authors greatly appreciate the subjects in this study for their time and willingness to participate. This study was funded by CamelBak. The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose for the submitted work.

Funding

This study was founded by CamelBak.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yasuki Sekiguchi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose for the submitted work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sekiguchi, Y., Martin, D.G., Yoshihara, A. et al. Comparison between digital and paper urine color to assess hydration status. Eur J Nutr 62, 1915–1919 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-022-03037-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-022-03037-0

Keywords

Navigation