The main objective of the PROFRUVE study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a TPB-based intervention program at increasing fruit and vegetable (FV) consumption in schoolchildren aged 7–10.
Eight eligible classrooms were randomly assigned to the intervention (classrooms n = 4; children n = 90) or control group (classrooms n = 4; children n = 95). The intervention group received 14 sessions of 1 h during an academic year (from October to June) but the control group did not. Sessions were based on the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) and focused on modifying FV intake. FV consumption was evaluated before, shortly after and 1 year after intervention ended using validated 7-day food records.
FV intake increased significantly in the intervention group (+ 0.45 servings/day; 95% CI 0.17–0.74; p = 0.001) but not in the control group (+ 0.01 servings/day; 95% CI −0.20–0.22; p = 0.409) shortly after the intervention. Long-term measurement showed that 1 year after intervention finished, the intervention group maintained the effect (+ 0.52 servings/day from baseline; 95% CI 0.22–0.78; p = 0.003). Linear mixed model also showed that nested groups by classrooms differ from intervention and control groups regarding FV intake change (p = 0.002). Multiple linear regression showed that receiving the intervention (B = 0.345, p = 0.045) and FV baseline intake (B = − 0.383, p = 0.000) were associated with FV intake change after adjusting the model by age, gender and family social economic status (SES) (R2 = 0.196).
The intervention program based on TPB seemed to be moderately effective in increasing FV intake and successful in maintaining the effect of the reached increase. Moreover, baseline FV intake determined the effect size of the intervention.
This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. Identifier: NCT03400891. Data registered 17/01/2018.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Wosje KS, Khoury PR, Claytor RP et al (2010) Dietary patterns associated with fat and bone mass in young children. Am J Clin Nutr 92:294–303
Hartley L, Igbinedion E, Holmes J et al (2013) Increased consumption of fruit and vegetables for the primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009874.pub2
Alissa EM, Ferns GA (2017) Dietary fruits and vegetables and cardiovascular diseases risk. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 57:1950–1962
Zhan J, Liu YJ, Cai LB et al (2017) Fruit and vegetable consumption and risk of cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 57:1650–1663
Aune D, Giovannucci E, Boffetta P et al (2017) Fruit and vegetable intake and the risk of cardiovascular disease, total cancer and all-cause mortality—a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. Int J Epidemiol. 46:1029–1056
Wang Y, Li F, Wang Z et al (2015) Fruit and vegetable consumption and risk of lung cancer: a dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Lung Cancer. 88(2):124–130
Key TJ, Schatzkin A, Willett WC et al (2004) Diet, nutrition and the prevention of cancer. Public Health Nutr 7:187–200
Maynard M, Gunnell D, Emmett P et al (2003) Fruit, vegetables, and antioxidants in childhood and risk of adult cancer: the boyd orr cohort. J Epidemiol Community Health 57(3):218–225
Wu Y, Zhang D, Jiang X et al (2015) Fruit and vegetable consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 25:140–147
Ledoux TA, Hingle MD, Baranowski T (2011) Relationship of fruit and vegetable intake with adiposity: a systematic review. Obes Rev 12(5):e143–e150
Lloyd JJ, Wyatt KM, Creanor S (2012) Behavioural and weight status outcomes from an exploratory trial of the healthy lifestyles programme (HeLP): a novel school-based obesity prevention programme. BMJ Open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000390
Yngve A, Wolf A, Poortvliet E et al (2005) Fruit and vegetable intake in a sample of 11-year-old children in 9 european countries: the pro children cross-sectional survey. Ann Nutr Metab 49:236–245
AECOSAN. Encuesta ENALIA: Encuesta nacional de alimentación en la población infantil y adolescente (2018)
Pomerleau J, Lock K, Knai C et al (2004) Effectiveness of interventions and programmes promoting fruit and vegetable intake. Background paper for the joint FAO/WHO workshop on fruit and vegetable for health
Pearson N, Biddle SJ, Gorely T (2009) Family correlates of fruit and vegetable consumption in children and adolescents: a systematic review. Public Health Nutr. 12:267–283
Yee AZ, Lwin MO, Ho SS (2017) The influence of parental practices on child promotive and preventive food consumption behaviors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 14:47017-0501-3
Salvy SJ, de la Haye K, Bowker JC et al (2012) Influence of peers and friends on children's and adolescents' eating and activity behaviors. Physiol Behav 106:369–378
Contento IR (2010) Nutrition education: linking research, theory, and practice. Jones & Bartlett Publishers
Diep CS, Chen TA, Davies VF et al (2014) Influence of behavioral theory on fruit and vegetable intervention effectiveness among children: a meta-analysis. J Nutr Educ Behav 46:506–546
Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50:179–211
Arrizabalaga-López M, de Jáuregui DR, Portillo M et al (2018) A randomised controlled trial of a program based on the theory of planned behavior to promote fruit and vegetable intake among schoolchildren: PROFRUVE study protocol. BMC Public Health 18:827
Christian MS, Evans CE, Ransley JK et al (2012) Process evaluation of a cluster randomised controlled trial of a school-based fruit and vegetable intervention: project tomato. Public Health Nutr 15:459–465
Te Velde S, Brug J, Wind M et al (2008) Effects of a comprehensive fruit- and vegetable-promoting school-based intervention in three European countries: the pro children study. Br J Nutr 99:893–903
Lehto R, Määttä S, Lehto E et al (2014) The PRO GREENS intervention in finnish schoolchildren—the degree of implementation affects both mediators and the intake of fruits and vegetables. Br J Nutr 112:1185–1194
Krathwohl D (2002) A revision of bloom’s taxonomy: an Overview. Theory Pract 41(4):212–218
Petty RE, Cacioppo JT (1986) The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Adv Exp Soc Psychol 19:123–205
Rodríguez VM, Elbusto-Cabello A, Alberdi-Albeniz M et al (2014) New pre-coded food record form validation. Rev Esp Nutr Hum Diet 18:118–126
Evans CE, Christian MS, Cleghorn CL et al (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of school-based interventions to improve daily fruit and vegetable intake in children aged 5 to 12 y. Am J Clin Nutr 96:889–901
Howerton MW, Bell BS, Dodd KW et al (2007) School-based nutrition programs produced a moderate increase in fruit and vegetable consumption: meta and pooling analyses from 7 studies. J Nutr Educ Behav 39:186–196
Knai C, Pomerleau J, Lock K et al (2006) Getting children to eat more fruit and vegetables: a systematic review. Prev Med 42:85–95
de Sa J, Lock K (2008) Will european agricultural policy for school fruit and vegetables improve public health? a review of school fruit and vegetable programmes. Eur J Public Health 18(6):558–568
Kipping RR, Howe LD, Jago R et al (2014) Effect of intervention aimed at increasing physical activity, reducing sedentary behaviour, and increasing fruit and vegetable consumption in children: active for life year 5 (AFLY5) school based cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ 348:g3256
World Health Organization (2015) Guideline: sugars intake for adults and children. World Health Organization
Lawlor DA, Howe LD, Anderson EL et al (2015) The active for life year 5 (AFLY5) school-based cluster randomised controlled trial: effect on potential mediators. BMC Public Health 16:68
Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D (2010) CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMC Med 8:18
Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC et al (2011) The cochrane collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 343:d5928
The authors wish to thank Slow Food Araba, “5 al día” Association, Ausolan and Tamar for their collaboration in the study. We also thank pre-graduate students for their collaboration in the design of the material. Moreover, our special thanks go to schoolteachers and directors.
This study was supported by the Government of the Basque Country (IT572/13), CIBERobn (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red, ISCIII), University of the Basque Country and City Council of Vitoria-Gasteiz (Programa de Fomento del Consumo de Fruta y Verdura en la Población Infantil de Vitoria-Gasteiz FASE II US14/15). Arrizabalaga-Lopez M is a PhD fellowship holder from the University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU.
Conflict of interest:
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
The study was approved by the Ethic Committee of the University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU (CEISH/262/2014/RODRIGUEZRIVERA). Parents or legal guardians, school directors and teachers completed a written consent form before the study commences.
About this article
Cite this article
Arrizabalaga-López, M., Rada-Fernández de Jáuregui, D., Portillo, M.P. et al. A theory-based randomized controlled trial in promoting fruit and vegetable intake among schoolchildren: PROFRUVE study. Eur J Nutr 59, 3517–3526 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-020-02185-5