Consumption of a drink containing extruded sorghum reduces glycaemic response of the subsequent meal
- 183 Downloads
Glycaemic control is essential to prevent the manifestation of diabetes in predisposed individuals and the development of associated comorbidities. It is believed that sorghum may modulate the glucose response. In this study, we investigated the effect of extruded sorghum consumption, and the profile of bioactive compounds, on postprandial glycaemia of a subsequent meal in normal weight and normoglycaemic subjects.
This was a randomized, single-blind, crossover designed study. After a 12 h overnight fasting, ten subjects reported to the laboratory to participate in four experimental sessions, and consumed one of three sorghum test drinks: sorghum P 3-DXAs (with proanthocyanidins—P and rich in 3-deoxyanthocyanidins—3-DXAs); 3-DXAs (without proanthocyanidins and rich in 3-DXAs); and control (low in 3-DXAs and without proanthocyanidins); or a non-sorghum drink. 30 min later, the subjects consumed a glucose solution (25 g glucose). Glycaemic response was monitored at times 0 (before glucose solution), 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120 min (after glucose solution consumption). The incremental areas under the glycaemic curve (iAUC) were calculated by the trapezoidal method.
Intake of P 3-DXAs drink before the glucose solution resulted in a postprandial iAUC lower than the other sorghum test drinks. Sorghum drinks minimized the postprandial glycaemia peak.
Sorghum drinks consumption, especially the P 3-DXAs drink, 30 min before the glucose solution resulted in lower iAUC compared to the non-sorghum drink, leading to a lower glycaemic response.
KeywordsDiabetes mellitus Glycaemic response Sorghum Food and beverages
- 12.Wolever TM, Jenkins DJ, Ocana AM, Rao VA, Collier GR (1988) Second-meal effect: low-glycemic-index foods eaten at dinner improve subsequent breakfast glycemic response. Am J Clin Nutr 48:1041–1047Google Scholar
- 14.Ton WTS, Almeida CdGd, Cardoso LdM, Girondoli YM, Pereira PF, Schitini JKVG, Candido FG, Arbex PM, Alfenas RdCG (2014) Effect of different protein types on second meal postprandial glycaemia in normal weight and normoglycemic subjects. Nutr Hosp 29:553–558Google Scholar
- 15.Group WW (1986) Use and interpretation of anthropometric indicators of nutritional status. Bull World Health Organ 64:929Google Scholar
- 16.Lohman TG, Roche AF, Martorell R (1988) Anthropometric standardization reference manual. Human Kinetics Press, Champaign, ILGoogle Scholar
- 19.Cardoso LM (2014) Sorghum: variability of nutrients and bioactive compounds and their heat processing stability. Department of Nutrition and Health. Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, p 124Google Scholar
- 22.Bantle JP, Wylie-Rosett J, Albright AL, Apovian CM, Clark NG, Franz MJ, Hoogwerf BJ, Lichtenstein AH, Mayer-Davis E, Mooradian AD (2008) Nutrition recommendations and interventions for diabetes: a position statement of the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care 31:S61–S78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Jenkins DJ, Wolever TM, Taylor RH, Griffiths C, Krzeminska K, Lawrie JA, Bennett CM, Goff DV, Sarson DL, Bloom SR (1982) Slow release dietary carbohydrate improves second meal tolerance. Am J Clin Nutr 35(6):1339–1346Google Scholar