Skip to main content

Consumer understanding and nutritional communication: key issues in the context of the new EU legislation

European Journal of Nutrition volume 48, pages 41–48 (2009)Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Nutrition communication by means of nutrition and health claims and otherwise, holds the potential to contribute to public health by stimulating informed healthier food choices and enhanced health-focussed competition in the market place, provided that the health messages are trustworthy (i.e. scientifically substantiated) and correctly used and interpreted by the consumer. Not surprisingly, these two considerations constitute the cornerstone of the new EU legislation on nutrition and health claims, in which evidence for consumer understanding of nutrition and health claims is a new requirement.

Aim of the study

To review some of the key issues in consumer understanding of nutritional communication as a basis for reflection on the consumer understanding element of the new EU legislation on nutrition and health claims.

Conclusions

There is a need for more methodologically advanced research in consumer understanding of nutrition and health claims as a basis for truly assessing the real-life use of such information and its actual effect on consumer food choices. Such approaches are pertinent in light of the evaluation and approval process of (new) nutrition and health claims as required under the new EU legislation on nutrition and health claims.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  1. Nielsen AC (2006) What’s hot around the globe: insights on growth in food and beverages. http://www2.acnielsen.com/reports/documents/2006WhatsHotFoodBev.pdf

  2. Caswell JA, Ning T, Liu F, Mojduszka EM (2003) The effect of new labelling regulations on the use of voluntary nutrient-content and health claims by food manufacturers. J Public Policy Mark 22:147–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cowburn G, Stockley L (2005) Consumer understanding and use of nutrition labelling: a systematic review. Public Health Nutr 8:21–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Darby MR, Kerni E (1973) Free competition and the optimal amount of fraud. J Law Econ 16:67–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Drichoutis AC, Lazaridis P, Nayga RM (2006) Consumers’use of nutrition labels: a review of research studies and issues. Acad Mark Sci Rev 10(9). Available at: http://www.amsreview.org/articles/drichoutis09-2006.pdf

  6. EHN (2007) Review of front of pack nutrition schemes. European Heart Foundation

  7. European Parliament (2007) Corrigendum to Regulation (EC) No. 1924/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on Nutrition and Health Claims made on Foods, Corrigenda, Official Journal of the European Union, January 18, 404:L12/3-L12/18

  8. Feunekes GIJ, Gortemaker IA, Willems AA, Lion R, Van den Kommer M (2008) Front-of-pack nutrition labelling: testing effectiveness of different nutrition labelling formats front-of-pack in four European countries. Appetite 50:57–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fishbein M, Ajzen I (1975) Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  10. Garretson JA, Burton S (2000) Effects of nutrition fact panel value, nutrition claims and health claims on consumer attitudes, perceptions of disease-related risks and trust. J Public Policy Mark 19:213–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Grunert KG, Wills JM (2007) A review of European research on consumer response to nutrition information on food labels. J Public Health 25:385–399

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hawkes C (2004) Nutrition labels and health claims: the global regulatory environment. World Health Organisation, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  13. Keller SB, Landy M, Olson J, Velliquette A, Burton S, Andrews C (1997) The effects of nutrition package claims, nutrition facts panels and motivation to process nutrition information on consumer product evaluation. J Public Policy Mark 16:256–269

    Google Scholar 

  14. Larsson I, Lissner L, Wilhelmsen L (1999) The ‘Green Keyhole’ revisited: nutritional knowledge may influence food selection. Eur J Clin Nutr 52:776–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Leathwood P, Richardson DR, Straeter P, Todd PM, Van Trijp HCM (2007) Consumer understanding of health claims: sources of evidence. Br J Nutr 98(3):474–484

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. LeGault L, Brandt MB, Mccabe N, Adler C, Brown A-M, Brecher S (2004) 2000–2001 Food label and package survey: an update on prevalence of nutrition labelling and claims on processed packaged foods. J Am Diet Assoc 104:952–958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Parker BJ (2003) Food for health. J Advert 32:47–55

    Google Scholar 

  18. Petty RE, Cacioppo JT (1986) The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In: Berkowitz L (ed) Advances in experimental social psychology 19. Academic Press, New York, pp 123–205

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Rayner M, Boaz A, Higginson C (2001) Consumer use of health-related endorsements on food labels in the United Kingdom and Australia. J Nutr Educ 33(1):24–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Roe BE, Levy AS, Derby BM (1999) The impact of health claims on consumer search and product evaluation outcomes: results from FDA experimental data. J Public Policy Mark 18(1):89–115

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sloan AE (2007) Top 10 food trends. Food Technol 61(4):22–39

    Google Scholar 

  22. Smith SC, Stephen AM, Dombrow C, MacQuarrie D (2002) Food information programs: a review of the literature. Can J Diet Pract Res 63(2):55–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Steenhuis IP, Van Assema P, Van Breukelen G, Glanz K (2004) The effectiveness of nutrition education and labelling in Dutch supermarkets. Am J Health Promot 18:221–224

    Google Scholar 

  24. Van Kleef E, Van Trijp HCM, Paeps F, Fernandez L (2008) Consumer preferences for front-of-pack calories labelling. Public Health Nutr 11(2):203–213

    Google Scholar 

  25. Van Trijp HCM, Van der Lans IA (2007) Consumer perceptions of nutrition and health claims. Appetite 48:305–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Verbeke W (2005) Agriculture and the food industry in an information age. Eur Rev Agric Econ 32(3):347–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wansink B (2003) How do front and back package labels influence beliefs about health claims? J Consum Aff 37(2):305–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wansink B, Cheney M (2005) Leveraging FDA claims. J Consum Aff 39:386–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wansink B, Sonka S, Hasler C (2004) Front-label health claims: when less is more. Food Policy 29:659–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Williams P (2005) Consumer understanding and use of health claims for foods. Nutr Rev 63:256–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Williams P, Yeatman H, Ridges L, Houston A, Rafferty J, Roesler A, Sobierajski M, Spratt B (2006) Nutrition function, health and related claims on packaged Australian food products: prevalence and compliance with regulations. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 15(1):10–20

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This article was commissioned by the Functional Foods Task Force of the European branch of the International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI Europe). Industry members of this task force are Ajinomoto Europe, Barilla G. & F. Fratelli, Bayer CropScience BioScience, Beverage Partners Worldwide, Cadbury, Coca-Cola Europe, Colloïdes Naturels International, CSM, Danisco, Danone, Dow Europe, DSM, FieslandCampina, Frutarom, International Nutrition Company – INC, Kellogg Europe, Kraft Foods, La Morella Nuts, Mars, Martek Biosciences Corporation, McNeil Nutritionals, Monsanto, Naturex, Nestlé, PepsiCo International, Procter & Gamble, Raisio Group, Red Bull, Raffinerie Tirlemontoise – ORAFTI, Südzucker/BENEO Group, Syral, Tate & Lyle, Ülker Bisküvi, Unilever, Soremartec Italia – Ferrero Group, Valio, Wild Flavors, Wimm-Bill-Dann Foods, Wrigley and Yakult Europe. For further information about ILSI Europe, please email info@ilsieurope.be or call +32 2 771 00 14. The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of ILSI Europe.

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Marketing and Consumer Behaviour Group, Wageningen University, Hollandseweg 1, 6706 KN, Wageningen, The Netherlands

    Hans C. M. van Trijp

Authors
  1. Hans C. M. van Trijp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Please direct all correspondence to: ILSI Europe a.i.s.b.l, Avenue E. Mounier 83, Box 6, 1200 Brussels, Belgium. E-mail: publications@ilsieurope.be

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Trijp, H.C.M. Consumer understanding and nutritional communication: key issues in the context of the new EU legislation. Eur J Nutr 48, 41–48 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-009-0075-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-009-0075-1

Keywords

  • Consumer understanding
  • Nutrition and health claims
  • EU legislation
  • Nutrition communication