European Journal of Nutrition

, Volume 44, Issue 8, pp 459–464 | Cite as

General methodological considerations for the assessment of nutritional influences on human cognitive functions

  • Jeroen A. J. Schmitt
  • David Benton
  • K. Wolfgang Kallus
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION

Summary

The premise that cognitive functioning can be influenced through dietary means has gained widespread interest. The assessment of cognitive functioning is a key method to scientifically substantiate such nutritional effects on cognition. The current paper provides a basic overview of the main concepts, issues and pitfalls of human cognitive research. General methods of cognitive assessment, selection of appropriate tests, factors that may mediate task performance and issues pertaining to the interpretation of the results are discussed.

Keywords

cognition mood nutrition behavioural-assessment methodology human 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Westenhoefer J, Bellisle F, Blundell JE, de Vries J, Edwards D, Kallus W, Milon H, Pannemans D, Tuijtelaars S, Tuorila H (2004) PASSCLAIM—Mental state and performance. Eur J Nutr 43:II/85–II117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sanders AF (1998) Energetics, Stress and Sustained Attention. In: Sanders AF (ed) Elements of Human Performance. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey, pp 394–451Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yerkes RM, Dodson JD (1908) The relation of strength of stimuli to rapidity of habituation. J Comp Neurol Psychol 18:459–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Watters PA, Martin F, Schreter Z (1997) Caffeine and cognitive performance: the nonlinear Yerkes-Dodson Law. Hum Psychofarmacol 12:249–257Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Blaney PH (1986) Affect and memory: a review. Psychol Bull 99:229–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Revelle W (1986) Motivation and efficiency of cognitive performance. In: Brown DR, Veroff J (eds) Frontiers of Motivational Psychology: Essays in honor of J. W. Atkinson. Springer, pp 105–131Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lezak MD, Howieson DB, Loring DW (2004) Neuropsychological assessment. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hughes D, Bryan J (2003) The assessment of cognitive performance in children: considerations for detecting nutritional influences. Nutr Rev 61:413–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sternberg S (1969) Memory scanning: mental processes revealed by reaction time experiments. Am Sci 57:421–457Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Poldrack RA, Wagner AD (2004) What can neuroimaging tell us about the mind? Insights from prefrontal cortex. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 13:177–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wilkinson D, Halligan P (2004) The relevance of behavioural measures for functional-imaging studies of cognition. Nat Rev Neurosci 5:67–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bub DN (2000) Methodological issues confronting PET and fMRI studies of cognitive functions. Cogn Neuropsychol 17:467–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kosik KS (2003) Beyond phrenology, at last. Nat Rev Neurosci 4:234–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Curran S (1990) Critical Flicker Fusion techniques in psychopharmacology. In: Hindmarch I, Stonier PD (eds) Human Psychopharmacology. John Wiley, Chichester, pp 21–38Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Warm JS (1984) An introduction to vigilance. In: Warm JS (ed) Sustained Attention in Human Performance. John Wiley and Sons, pp 1–13Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schaie KW (1994) The course of adult intellectual development. Am Psychol 49:304–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Liben LS, Susman EJ, Finkelstein JW, Chinchilli VM, Kunselman S, Schwab J, Dubas JS, Demers LM, Lookingbill G, Darcangelo MR, Krogh HR, Kulin HE (2002) The effects of sex steroids on spatial performance: a review and an experimental clinical investigation. Dev Psychol 38:236–253Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Houx PJ, Vreeling FW, Jolles J (1991) Age-associated cognitive decline is related to biological life events. In: Iqbal K, McLachlan DRC, Winblad B, Wisniewski HM (eds) Alzheimer’s Disease: Basic Mechanisms, Diagnosis and Therapeutic Strategies. John Wiley and Sons Ltd, Chichester, UK, pp 353–359Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Monk TH, Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF, 3rd, Berga SL, Jarrett DB, Begley AE, Kupfer DJ (1997) Circadian rhythms in human performance and mood under constant conditions. J Sleep Res 6:9–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wilson BA, Watson PC, Baddeley AD, Emslie H, Evans JJ (2000) Improvement or simply practice? The effects of twenty repeated assessments on people with and without brain injury. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 6:469–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Adams JA (1961) The second facet of forgetting: A review of warm-up decrement. Psychol Bull 58:257–273Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hockey GRJ (1997) Compensatory control in the regulation of human performance under stress and high workload: a cognitive energetical framework. Biol Psychol 45:73–93Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sanders AF (1998) Elements of Human Performance. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dye L, Blundell JE (2002) Functional foods: psychological and behavioural functions. Br J Nutr 88:S187–S211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Schmuckler MA (2001) What is ecological validity? A dimensional analysis. Infancy 2:419–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kibby MY, Schmitter-Edgecombe M, Long CJ (1998) Ecological validity of neuropsychological tests: focus on the California Verbal Learning Test and the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 13:523–534Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Chaytor N, Schmitter-Edgecombe M (2003) The ecological validity of neuropsychological tests: a review of the literature on everyday cognitive skills. Neuropsychol Rev 13:181–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ramaekers JG (2003) Antidepressants and driving impairment: empirical evidence from a standard over de road test. J Clin Psychiatry 64:20–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rose SPR (2002) Smart drugs: do they work? Are they ethical? Will they be legal? Nat Rev Neurosci 3:975–979CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Steinkopff-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeroen A. J. Schmitt
    • 1
    • 2
  • David Benton
    • 3
  • K. Wolfgang Kallus
    • 4
  1. 1.Nestlé Research Center Nutrition and Health Dept.LausanneSwitzerland
  2. 2.ILSI Europe A.I.S.B.L.BrusselsBelgium
  3. 3.University of Wales at Swansea, Dept. of PsychologySwanseaUK
  4. 4.Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz, Institut für PsychologieGrazAustria

Personalised recommendations