Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Variation of microbiological and biochemical parameters in the faeces of two healthy people over a 15 day period

  • ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION
  • Published:
European Journal of Nutrition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Background

Recent years have seen increasing interest in the complex microbial ecosystem of the human gastrointestinal tract. Knowledge of its microbial colonists and their beneficial/detrimental activities is important. However, generalized assumptions about the microbial composition of the human gut should be taken with caution until more studies in different human communities have been conducted. The capacity of modulating or inhibiting harmful populations through high doses of beneficial microorganisms (probiotics) is now an attractive possibility.

Aims

The aim of this study was to determine the daily variation in the most prominent and representative of the cultivable microbial populations in the faeces of two healthy Spanish persons, with special reference to the lactic acid bacteria (lactobacilli and bifidobacteria). Faecal enzymatic activities caused or modulated by gut microorganisms were also examined.

Methods

Microbial populations were enumerated in selective and differential media. LAB species isolated from MRS agar plates were further identified by phenotypic and genetic techniques. Enzymatic activities were measured by the semi quantitative method of the API ZYM system.

Results

Obligate anaerobes (members of the Clostridium clusters and species of bacteroides and bifidobacteria) made up the largest bacterial populations in both individuals (ranging between 1010–1011 cfu/g of faeces) and remained constant over time. Lactobacilli species were found at an intermediate level (around 108 cfu/g), and yeasts and moulds, staphylococci, enterococci, coliforms and Enterobacteriaceae at a lower level (between 103 to 106 cfu/g). 38 lactic acid bacteria strains identified belonged to Bifidobacterium bifidum [19], Bifidobacterium longum [7], Bifidobacterium adolescentis [7] and Lactobacillus ruminis [5] species. Enzymatic profiles and values were shown to be personal and stable, but inter–sample fluctuations were recorded.

Conclusions

The dominant microbial populations in the faeces of the two persons were similar and stable during the sampling period. Large differences were found in the lactic acid bacterial composition of each individual. Biochemistry seemed to be also personal and stable over time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Drasar BS, Barrow PA (1985) Intestinal microbiology. American Society for Microbiology, Wahington DC

  2. Conway PL (1995) Microbial ecology of the human large intestine. In: Gibson GR, Macfarlane GT (eds) Human Colonic Bacteria: Role in Nutrition, Physiology, and Pathology, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, pp 1–24

  3. Tannock GW (1999) Analysis of the intestinal microflora: a renaissance. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 76:265–278

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hayashi H, Sakamoto M, Benno Y (2002) Faecal microbial diversity in a strict vegetarian as determined by molecular analysis and cultivation. Microbiol Immunol 46:819–31

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Falk PG, Hooper LV, Midtvedt T, Gordon JI (1998) Creating and maintaining the gastrointestinal ecosystem: what we know and need to know from gnotobiology. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 62:1157–1170

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gill HS (1998) Stimulation of the immune system. Int Dairy J 8:535–544

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Parodi PW (1999) The role of intestinal bacteria in the causation and prevention of cancer: modulation by diet and probiotics. Aust J Dairy Technol 54:103–121

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rowland IR (1995) Toxicology of the colon. Role of the intestinal microflora. In: Gibson GR, Macfarlane GT (eds) Human Colonic Bacteria: Role in Nutrition, Physiology, and Pathology, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, pp 155–174

  9. Guarner F, Malagelada JR (2003) Gut flora in health and disease. Lancet 360:512–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Biavati B, Castagnoli P, Crociani F, Trovatelli LD (1986) Species of the genus Bifidobacterium in the feces of human adults. Microbiologica 9:39–45

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mitsuoka T (1992) The human gastrointestinal tract. In: Wood BJB (ed) The Lactic Acid Bacteria, Vol. 1. The Lactic Acid Bacteria in Health and Disease, Elsevier Applied Science, London, pp 69–114

  12. McCartney AL, Wang W, Tannock GW (1996) Molecular analysis of the composition of the bifidobacterial and lactobacilli microflora of humans. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:4608–4613

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wilson KH, Blitchington RB (1996) Human colonic biota studied by ribosomal DNA sequence analysis. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:2273–2278

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Franks AH, Harmens HJM, Raangs GC, Jansen GJ, Schut F, Welling GW (1998) Variation of bacterial populations in human feces measured by fluorescent in situ hybridization with group-specific 16S rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes. Appl Environ Microbiol 6:3336–3345

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zoetendal EG, Akkermans ADL, de Vos WM (1998) Temperature gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of 16S rRNA from human faecal samples reveals stable and host-specific communities of active bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:3854–3863

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sau A, Bonnet R, Sutren M, Godon J-J, Gibson GR, Collins MD, Doré J (1999) Direct analysis of genes encoding 16S rRNA from complex communities reveals many novel molecular species within the human gut. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:4799–4807

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Salminen S, Bouley C, Boutron-Ruault M-C, Cummings JH, Franck A, Gibson GR, Isolauri E, Moreau M-C, Roberfroid M, Rowland I (1998) Functional food science and gastrointestinal physiology and function. British J Nutr 80:S147–S171

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tannock GW (1999) A fresh look at the intestinal microflora. In: Tannock GW (ed) Probiotics. A critical review, Horizon Scientific Press, Norfolk, England, pp 5–14

  19. Vaughan EE, de Vries MC, Zoetendal EG, Ben-Amor K, Akkermans ADL, de Vos WM (2002) The intestinal LABs. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 82:341–352

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Salminen S, Ouwehand AC, Isolauri E (1998) Clinical applications of probiotic bacteria. Int Dairy J 8:563–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sanders ME (1998) Overview of functional foods: emphasis on probiotic bacteria. Int Dairy J 8:341–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Saxelin M (1996) Colonization of the human gastrointestinal tract by probiotic bacteria. Nutr Today 31S:5S–8S

    Google Scholar 

  23. Charteris WP, Kelli PM, Morelli L, Collins JK (1998) Development and application of an in vitro methodology to determine the transient tolerance of potentially probiotic Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium species in the upper human gastrointestinal tract. J Appl Microbiol 84:759–768

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Fujiwara S, Seto Y, Kimura A, Hashiba H (2001) Establishment of orally-administered Lactobacillus gassery SBT2055SR in the gastrointestinal tract of humans and its influence on intestinal microflora and metabolism. J Appl Microbiol 90:343–352

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Haavenar R, ten Brink BT, Huis in’t Veld JHJ (1992) Selection of strains for probiotics use. In: Fuller R (ed) Probiotics the Scientific Basis, Chapman and Hall, London, pp 209–224

  26. Dunne C, O’Mahony L, Murphy L, Thornton G,Morrissey D, O’Halloran S, Fenney M, Flynn S, Fitzgerald G, Daly C, Kiely B, O’Sullivan GC, Shanahan F, Collins JK (2001) In vitro selection criteria for probiotic bacteria of human origin: correlation with in vivo findings. Am J Clin Nutr 73S:386S–392S

    Google Scholar 

  27. Payne JF, Morris AEJ, Beers P (1999) Note: evaluation of selective media for the enumeration of Bifidobacterium sp. in milk. J Appl Microbiol 86:353–358

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Young JPW, Downer HL, Eardly BD (1991) Phylogeny of the prototrophic Rhizobium strain BTAil by polymerase chain reaction-based sequencing of a 16S rRNA segment. J Bacteriol 173:2271–2277

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ward L, Brown J,Graham D (1998) Two methods for the genetic differentiation of Lactococcus lactis ssp. lactis and cremoris based on differences in the 16S rRNA gene sequence. FEMS Microbiol Lett 166:15–21

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein databases search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25:3389–3402

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Langendij PSF, Schut F, Jansen GJ, Raangs GC, Kamphuis GR, Wilkinson MH, Welling GW (1995) Quantitative fluorescence in situ hybridization of Bifidobacterium spp. with genus specific 16S rRNA-targeted probes and its application in faecal samples. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:3069–3075

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kimura K, McCartney AL, McConnell MA, Tannock GW (1997) Analysis of faecal populations of bifidobacteria and lactobacilli and investigations of the immunological responses of their human hosts to the predominant strains. App Environ Microbiol 63:3394–3398

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Reuter G (2001) The Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium microflora of the human intestine: composition and succession. Curr Issues Intestinal Microbiol 2:43–53

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Kandler O, Weiss N (1986) Genus Lactobacillus Beijerinck 1901:212AL. In: Sneath PHA, Mair NS, Sharpe ME, Holt JG (eds) Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Vol 2, Williams and Wilkings, Baltimore, pp 1209–1234

  35. Heilig HGHJ, Zoetendal EG, Vaughan EE, Marteau P, Akkermans ADL, de Vos WM (2002) Molecular diversity of Lactobacillus spp. and other lactic acid bacteria in the human intestine as determined by specific amplification of 16S ribosomal DNA. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:114–123

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Mykkänen H, Laiho K, Salminen S (1998) Variations in faecal bacterial enzyme activities and associations with bowel function and diet in elderly subjects. J Appl Microbiol 85:37–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Instituto de Productos Lácteos de Asturias-CSIC Carretera de Infiesto s/n, 33300, Villaviciosa (Asturias), Spain

    S. Delgado & B. Mayo

  2. Servicio de Digestivo, Hospital de Cabueñes, Gijón, Spain

    A. Suárez

  3. Servicio de Microbiología, Hospital de Cabueñes, Gijón, Spain

    L. Otero

Authors
  1. S. Delgado
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Suárez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. L. Otero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. B. Mayo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Mayo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Delgado, S., Suárez, A., Otero, L. et al. Variation of microbiological and biochemical parameters in the faeces of two healthy people over a 15 day period. Eur J Nutr 43, 375–380 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-004-0485-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-004-0485-z

Key words

Search

Navigation