Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Medikamentöse Interaktionen in der Rheumatologie

Drug-drug interactions in antirheumatic treatment

  • CME Zertifizierte Fortbildung
  • Published:
Zeitschrift für Rheumatologie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Medikamentöse Interaktionen stellen einen wichtigen Grund für gefährliche Nebenwirkungen und stationäre Einweisungen dar. Auch in der Rheumatologie bilden sie ein Problem, das im Praxisalltag evtl. nicht ausreichend wahrgenommen wird. Sie sind für die meisten hier verwendeten Medikamente beschrieben; nicht immer ist ihre praktische Relevanz klar. Zu den Antirheumatika mit häufigeren und praktisch wichtigen Interaktionsproblemen zählen nichtsteroidale Antiphlogistika (NSAR), Methotrexat, Azathioprin, Mycophenolat-Mofetil und insbesondere Cyclosporin A. Für alle anderen Substanzen sind einzelne Wechselwirkungen beschrieben, die meist nicht mit gefährlichen Folgen verbunden sind. Die wichtigsten Einzelinteraktionen mit potenziell lebensbedrohlichen Konsequenzen resultieren aus der gleichzeitigen Verabreichung von Methotrexat und Cotrimoxazol sowie Azathioprin und Allopurinol. Bei Multimedikation sollte grundsätzlich an Interaktionen gedacht werden. Ältere Patienten sind diesem Risiko besonders ausgesetzt.

Abstract

Clinically relevant drug-drug interactions contribute considerably to potentially dangerous drug side-effects and are frequently the reason for hospitalization. Nevertheless they are often overlooked in daily practice. For most antirheumatic drugs a vast number of interactions have been described but only a minority with clinical relevance. Several potentially important drug interactions exist for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate-mofetil and especially for cyclosporin A. Most importantly co-medication with methotrexate and sulfmethoxazole trimethoprim as well as azathioprine and allopurinol carries the risk of severe, sometimes life-threatening consequences. Nevertheless, besides these well-known high-risk combinations in each case of polypharmacy with antirheumatic drugs it is necessary to bear in mind the possibility of drug interactions. As polypharmacy is a common therapeutic practice in older patients with rheumatic diseases, they are at special risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2

Literatur

  1. Van Roon EN, Flikweert S, le Comte M et al (2006) Clinical relevance of drug-drug interactions. A structured assessment procedure. Drug Saf 28:1131–1139

    Google Scholar 

  2. Roughhead EE, Kalisch LM, Barratt JD et al (2010) Prevalence of potentially hazardous drug interactions amongst Australian veterans. Br J Clin Pharmacol 70:252–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Greenlaw CW (1981) Evaluation of a computerized drug interaction screening system. Am J Hosp Pharm 38:517–521

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wagner CC, Locher P, Elke B, Corti N (2009) Häufige Medikamenteninteraktionen im Alter. Praxis 98:1185–1192

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Paneitz A, Meissner K, Kroemer HK (2000) Arzneimittelinteraktionen: Neue Mechanismen und klinische Relevanz. Internist 41:338–343

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Haffner S, Thürmann PA (2004) Welche Arzneimittelinteraktionen sollte der praktisch tätige Arzt kennen? Med Klin 99:137–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mackenzie IS, Coughtrie MWH, MacDonald TM, Wei L (2010) Antiplatelet drug interactions. J Intern Med 268:516–529

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. van Roon EN, van den Bemt PM, Jansen TL et al (2009) An evidence-based assessment of the clinical significance of drug-drug interactions between disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and non-antirheumatic drugs according to rheumatologists and pharmacists. Clin Ther 31:1737–1746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bourré-Tessier J, Haraoui B (2010) Methotrexate drug interactions in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review. J Rheumatol 37:1416–1421

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yamazaki H, Nanki T (2011) Methotrexate and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for pneumocystis pneumonia prophylaxis. J Rheumatol 38:777

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Curtis JR, Beukelman T, Onofrei A et al (2010) Elevated liver enzyme tests among rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis patients treated with methotrexate and/or leflunomide. Ann Rheum Dis 69:43–47

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Warrington JS, Shaw LM (2005) Pharmacogenetic differences and drug-drug interactions in immunosuppressive therapy. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 1:487–503

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dunn CJ, Wagstaff AJ, Perry CM et al (2001) Cyclosporin: an updated review of the pharmacokinetic properties, clinical efficacy and tolerability of a microemulsion-based formulation (neoral®)1 in organ transplantation. Drugs 61:1957–2016

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Müller EA, Kovarik JM, Koelle EU et al (1993) Pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine and multiple-dose diclofenac during coadministration. J Clin Pharmacol 33:936–943

    Google Scholar 

  15. Maltz HC, Balog DL, Cheigh JS (1999) Rhabdomyolysis associated with concomitant use of atorvastatin and cyclosporine. Ann Pharmacother 33:1176–1179

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. De Winter BC, van Gelder T (2008) Therapeutic drug monitoring for mycophenolic acid in patients with autoimmune diseases. Nephrol Dial Transplant 23:3386–3388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Schaier M, Scholl C, Scharpf D et al (2010) Proton pump inhibitors interfere with the immunosuppressive potency of mycophenolate mofetil. Rheumatology (Oxford) 49:2061–2067

    Google Scholar 

  18. Burmester GR, Feist E, Kellner H et al (2011) Effectiveness and safety of the interleukin 6-receptor antagonist tocilizumab after 4 and 24 weeks in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: the first phase IIIb real-life study (TAMARA). Ann Rheum Dis 70:755–759

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Dougados M, Kissel K, Amital H et al (2011) Double-blind study of tocilizumab plus methotrexate vs tocilizumab plus placebo in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite prior methotrexate: progression of structural damage, quality of life, and physical function at 24 weeks. Arthritis Rheum 63(Suppl 10):1032

    Google Scholar 

  20. Schmitt C, Kuhn B, Zhang X et al (2011) Disease-drug-drug interaction involving tocilizumab and simvastatin in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Pharmacol Ther 89:735–740

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Winiarska M, Bil J, Wiczek E et al (2008) Statins impair antitumor effects of rituximab by inducing conformational changes of CD20. PLoS Med 5:e64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Arts EEA, Jansen TL, Den Broeder A et al (2011) Statins inhibit the antirheumatic effects of rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis: results from the Dutch Rheumatoid Arthritis Monitoring (DREAM) registry. Ann Rheum Dis 70:877–878

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Unger M (2010) Pharmakokinetische Arzneimittelinteraktionen durch pflanzliche Arzneimittel. Kritische Bewertung und klinische Relevanz. Wien Med Wochenschr 160:571–577

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt für sich und seine Koautoren an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Krüger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krüger, K. Medikamentöse Interaktionen in der Rheumatologie. Z. Rheumatol. 71, 209–216 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00393-012-0973-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00393-012-0973-0

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation