Zusammenfassung
Die Sklerodermie als systemische rheumatologische Erkrankung, stellt selbst in der Gruppe der relativ seltenen Kollagenosen eine Rarität dar. Heterogenes Krankheitsbild und damit oft langwierige Diagnosefindung, sowie das Fehlen einer kausalen oder kurativen Behandlungsstrategie und die gelegentlich düstere Prognose, zeigen dem behandelnden Rheumatologen nach wie vor deutliche Grenzen möglicher Einflussnahme auf das Krankheitsgeschehen auf. Umso mehr kommt der Frage nach krankheitsbedingter Minderung der Erwerbsfähigkeit bei diesen Patienten große Bedeutung zu; und nur bestmögliches Wissen kann die Grundlage einer objektiven Beurteilung schaffen. Dieser Artikel soll das kollegiale Verständnis zwischen Gutachterärzten und Sklerodermiespezialisten fördern.
Abstract
Diagnosis and management of the rare disease systemic sclerosis (scleroderma) is a challenge for the physician, not least due to the possible multitude of organ systems involved. The medico-legal assessment is important for the patient claiming insurance benefits or applying for early retirement due to scleroderma. Both the specialist for sclerosis and the impartial medico-legal assessor have to cooperate and understand the respective partner’s requirements and terminology. Evaluations of individual organ impairments, handicaps and disabilities have to be taken into account when assessing the degree of impairment of occupational activity.
Literatur
Genth E, Krieg T (2006) [Systemic sclerosis – diagnosis and classification]. Z Rheumatol 65: 268–274
Legendre C, Allanore Y, Ferrand I, Kahan A (2005) Evaluation of depression and anxiety in patients with systemic sclerosis. Joint Bone Spine 72: 408–411
Schady W, Sheard A, Hassell A et al. (1991) Peripheral nerve dysfunction in scleroderma. Q J Med 80(292): 661–675
Rose S, Young MA, Reynolds JC (1998) Gastrointestinal manifestations of scleroderma. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 27: 563–594
Hesselstrand R, Scheja A, Shen GQ et al. (2003) The association of antinuclear antibodies with organ involvement and survival in systemic sclerosis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 42: 534–540
Steen VD, Powell DL, Medsger TA Jr (1988) Clinical correlations and prognosis based on serum autoantibodies in patients with systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheum 31: 196–203
Buch MH, Denton CP, Furst DE et al. (2007) Submaximal exercise testing in the assessment of interstitial lung disease secondary to systemic sclerosis: reproducibility and correlations of the 6-min walk test. Ann Rheum Dis 66: 169–173
Camiciottoli G, Orlandi I, Bartolucci M et al. (2007) Lung CT densitometry in systemic sclerosis: correlation with lung function, exercise testing, and quality of life. Chest 131: 672–681
McNearney TA, Reveille JD, Fischbach M et al. (2007) Pulmonary involvement in systemic sclerosis: associations with genetic, serologic, sociodemographic, and behavioral factors. Arthritis Rheum 57: 318–326
Candell-Riera J, Armadans-Gil L, Simeon CP et al. (1996) Comprehensive noninvasive assessment of cardiac involvement in limited systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheum 39: 1138–1145
Foerster J, Kuerth A, Niederstrasser E et al. (2007) A cold-response index for the assessment of Raynaud’s phenomenon. J Dermatol Sci 45: 113–120
Steen VD, Medsger TA Jr, Osial TA Jr et al. (1984) Factors predicting development of renal involvement in progressive systemic sclerosis. Am J Med 76: 779–786
Mehlhorn J, Gerlach C, Vetter J (1988) [Occupationally-induced progressive scleroderma and the heart]. Z Gesamte Inn Med 43: 231–234
Nietert PJ, Silver RM (2000) Systemic sclerosis: environmental and occupational risk factors. Curr Opin Rheumatol 12: 520–526
Haustein UF, Anderegg U (1998) Silica induced scleroderma – clinical and experimental aspects. J Rheumatol 25: 1917–1926
Haustein UF, Herrmann K (1994) Environmental scleroderma. Clin Dermatol 12: 467–473
Haustein UF, Ziegler V, Herrmann K et al. (1990) Silica-induced scleroderma. J Am Acad Dermatol 22: 444–448
Maitre A, Hours M, Bonneterre V et al. (2004) Systemic sclerosis and occupational risk factors: role of solvents and cleaning products. J Rheumatol 31: 2395–2401
Mayes MD (1999) Epidemiologic studies of environmental agents and systemic autoimmune diseases. Environ Health Perspect 107 Suppl 5: 743–748
Steen VD, Medsger TA Jr (1997) The value of the Health Assessment Questionnaire and special patient-generated scales to demonstrate change in systemic sclerosis patients over time. Arthritis Rheum 40: 1984–1991
Merkel PA (1998) Measurement of functional status, self-assessment, and psychological well-being in scleroderma. Curr Opin Rheumatol 10: 589–594
Sigl T, Ewert T, Stucki G (2004) Patientenzentriertes Assessment der funktionalen Gesundheit bei systemischer Sklerodermie – Wo stehen wir?. Z Rheumatol 63: 463–469
Beretta L, Santaniello A, Lemos A et al. (2007) Validity of the Saint George’s Respiratory Questionnaire in the evaluation of the health-related quality of life in patients with interstitial lung disease secondary to systemic sclerosis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 46: 296–301
Interessenkonflikt
Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Graninger, M. Das Krankheitsbild Sklerodermie im Begutachtungswesen. Z. Rheumatol. 66, 484–487 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00393-007-0206-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00393-007-0206-0