Skip to main content
Log in

Ambulante vs. stationäre Rehabilitation nach stattgehabtem Myokardinfarkt – Contra ambulante Rehabilitation

  • Published:
Zeitschrift für Kardiologie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Die ambulante Rehabilitation besitzt im Vergleich zur stationären in wesentlichen Bereichen der Struktur- und Prozeßqualität deutliche Nachteile und Einschränkungen, die das erfolgreiche Erreichen von wesentlichen Rehabilitationszielen in Frage stellen. Wir brauchen deshalb in der Zukunft ein flexibles System, das sowohl stationäre wie ambulante Rehabilitation erfolgreicher und kostengünstiger anbietet, mit enger und kluger Verzahnung beider Formen.

Ob die Kosten der ambulanten Rehabilitation, insbesondere unter einer komplexeren Sichtweise wirklich niedriger sind, bleibt abzuwarten. Die Zulassung der ambulanten Rehabilitation in der Orthopädie bescherte jedenfalls den Krankenkassen eine zusätzliche Kostenbelastung von ca. 50 Millionen DM.

Summary

Outpatient cardiac rehabilitation, as compared to inpatient rehabilitation, has substantial disadvantages for several patient groups. These drawbacks may lead to insufficient results in long term secondary prevention and to inadequate quality of life in patients with chronic heart disease. As outpatients, they remain in life circumstances which were, at least in part, causative for their heart diseases. Especially in elderly patients, those with a complicated course of disease, those who find adjusting their life style to the chronic disease state a daunting task, and those who find coping with the fact of being chronically ill as surpassing their psychological skills will find only in an inpatient setting all the relevant support delivered by a team of experts complementing each other for the benefit of the patient.

A flexible system for inpatient or/and subsequent outpatient cardiac rehabilitation should be adopted which can be tailored to the individual patient's needs.

It remains to be seen whether outpatient cardiac rehabilitation will really lower costs in the long run. This can be expected at best for a small group of relatively young patients with reasonably good physical fitness and no major problems in coping behaviour. The majority of patients needing cardiac rehabilitation does not fall into this group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Benesch, L. Ambulante vs. stationäre Rehabilitation nach stattgehabtem Myokardinfarkt – Contra ambulante Rehabilitation. Z Kardiol 87 (Suppl 2), s225–s227 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/s003920050571

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s003920050571

Navigation