Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Lessons learned from SCOT-HEART, DISCHARGE, and PRECISE: a patient-centered perspective with implications for the appropriate use of CCTA

  • Critical Perspective
  • Published:
Clinical Research in Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 07 November 2023

This article has been updated

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Change history

References

  1. Achenbach S, Moshage W, Ropers D, Nossen J, Daniel WG (1998) Value of electron-beam computed tomography for the noninvasive detection of high-grade coronary-artery stenoses and occlusions. N Engl J Med 339(27):1964–1971

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Task Force M, Montalescot G, Sechtem U et al (2013) 2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: the task force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 34(38):2949–3003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Eckert J, Renczes-Janetzko P, Schmidt M, Magedanz A, Voigtlander T, Schmermund A (2019) Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) using third-generation dual-source CT for ruling out in-stent restenosis. Clin Res Cardiol 108(4):402–410

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schmermund A, Eckert J, Schmidt M, Magedanz A, Voigtlander T (2018) Coronary computed tomography angiography: a method coming of age. Clin Res Cardiol 107(Suppl 2):40–48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A et al (2020) 2019 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J 41(3):407–477

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nationale Versorgungsleitlinie; Chronische KHK; Langfassung; 5. Auflage, 2019 Version 1; AWMF-Register-Nr.: nvl-004, 2019. https://www.khk.versorgungsleitlinien.de

  7. Investigators S-H, Newby DE, Adamson PD et al (2018) Coronary CT angiography and 5-year risk of myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 379(10):924–933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sabatine MS, Giugliano RP, Keech AC et al (2017) Evolocumab and clinical outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med 376(18):1713–1722

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Williams MC, Kwiecinski J, Doris M et al (2020) Low-attenuation noncalcified plaque on coronary computed tomography angiography predicts myocardial infarction: results from the multicenter SCOT-HEART trial (Scottish computed tomography of the HEART). Circulation 141(18):1452–1462

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Group DT, Maurovich-Horvat P, Bosserdt M et al (2022) CT or invasive coronary angiography in stable chest pain. N Engl J Med 386(17):1591–1602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nanna MG, Vemulapalli S, Fordyce CB et al (2022) The prospective randomized trial of the optimal evaluation of cardiac symptoms and revascularization: rationale and design of the PRECISE trial. Am Heart J 245:136–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Weir-McCall JR, Williams MC, Shah ASV et al (2023) National trends in coronary artery disease imaging: associations with health care outcomes and costs. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 16(5):659–671

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Renker M, Thiele H, Baldus S, Hamm CW, Korosoglou G (2023) First-line coronary CT angiography in chronic coronary syndromes: an internationally oriented translational outlook. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 16(5):722

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Korosoglou G (2023) Bedarfs- und leitliniengerechte Diagnostik bei symptomatischer obstruktiver koronarer Herzkrankheit mittels Kardio-CT und MRT. Positionspapier der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kardiologie. Die Kardiologie. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12181-023-00636-x

  15. Gulati M, Levy PD, Mukherjee D et al (2021) 2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR guideline for the evaluation and diagnosis of chest pain: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 144(22):e368–e454

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rolf A (2023) Qualitätskriterien für die Erbringung kardialer CT-Leistungen. Die Kardiologie 17:81–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, GRN Hospital Weinheim, Weinheim, Germany

    Grigorios Korosoglou

  2. Cardiac Imaging Center Weinheim, Hector Foundation, Weinheim, Germany

    Grigorios Korosoglou

  3. Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Science, Leipzig, Germany

    Holger Thiele

  4. Clinic III for Internal Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany

    Stephan Baldus

  5. Clinic of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Homburg, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany

    Michael Böhm

  6. Departments of Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany

    Norbert Frey

Authors
  1. Grigorios Korosoglou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Holger Thiele
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Stephan Baldus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Michael Böhm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Norbert Frey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Grigorios Korosoglou.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Korosoglou, G., Thiele, H., Baldus, S. et al. Lessons learned from SCOT-HEART, DISCHARGE, and PRECISE: a patient-centered perspective with implications for the appropriate use of CCTA. Clin Res Cardiol 112, 1347–1350 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-023-02277-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-023-02277-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation