Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Influence of the medical treatment schedule in new diagnoses patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clinical Research in Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aims

Heart failure (HF) guidelines recommend treating all patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) with quadruple therapy, although they do not establish how to start it. This study aimed to evaluate the implementation of these recommendations, analyzing the efficacy and safety of the different therapeutic schedules.

Methods and results

Prospective, observational, and multicenter registry that evaluated the treatment initiated in patients with newly diagnosed HFrEF and its evolution at 3 months. Clinical and analytical data were collected, as well as adverse reactions and events during follow-up.

Five hundred and thirty-three patients were included, selecting four hundred and ninety-seven, aged 65.5 ± 12.9 years (72% male). The most frequent etiologies were ischemic (25.5%) and idiopathic (21.1%), with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 28.7 ± 7.4%. Quadruple therapy was started in 314 (63.2%) patients, triple in 120 (24.1%), and double in 63 (12.7%). Follow-up was 112 days [IQI 91; 154], with 10 (2%) patients dying. At 3 months, 78.5% had quadruple therapy (p < 0.001). There were no differences in achieving maximum doses or reducing or withdrawing drugs (< 6%) depending on the starting scheme. Twenty-seven (5.7%) patients had any emergency room visits or admission for HF, less frequent in those with quadruple therapy (p = 0.02).

Conclusion

It is possible to achieve quadruple therapy in patients with newly diagnosed HFrEF early. This strategy makes it possible to reduce admissions and visits to the emergency room for HF without associating a more significant reduction or withdrawal of drugs or significant difficulty in achieving the target doses.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ARNI:

Dual inhibitors of type II angiotensin receptor and neprilysin

BB:

Beta-blockers

BP:

Blood pressure

CKD-EPI:

Chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration formula

CRT:

Cardiac resynchronization therapy

CV:

Cardiovascular

GFR:

Glomerular filtration rate

HF:

Heart failure

HFrEF:

Heart failure with a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction

HFpEF:

Heart failure with a preserved left ventricular ejection fraction

HR:

Heart rate

ICD:

Implantd cardiac desfibrilator

LVEF:

Left ventricular ejection fraction

MRA:

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists

NTproBNP:

Amino-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide type B portion

NYHA:

New York Heart Association

OR:

Odds ratio

RAASi:

Renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system inhibitors

SGLT2i:

Sodium and glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors

SBP:

Systolic blood pressure

TAPSE:

Tricuspid annulus plane systolic displacement

References

  1. Conrad N, Judge A, Tran J et al (2018) Temporal trends and patterns in heart failure incidence: a population-based study of 4 million individuals. Lancet (London, England) 391:572–580

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Martínez Santos P, Bover Freire R, Esteban Fernández A et al (2019) In-hospital mortality and readmissions for heart failure in Spain. A study of index episodes and 30-day and 1-year cardiac readmissions. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 72:998–1004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gómez-Otero I, Ferrero-Gregori A, Varela Román A et al (2017) Mid-range ejection fraction does not permit risk stratification among patients hospitalized for heart failure. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) 70:338–346

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Anguita Gámez M, Esteban Fernández A, García Márquez M, del Prado N, Elola Somoza FJ, Anguita Sanchez M (2022) Age and stabilization of admissions for heart failure in Spain (2006–2019). The beginning of the end of the “epidemic”? Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 76(4):272–274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Savarese G, Lund LH (2017) Global public health burden of heart failure. Card Fail Rev 3:7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Zannad F, Ferreira JP, Pocock SJ et al (2020) SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a meta-analysis of the EMPEROR-reduced and DAPA-HF trials. Lancet (London, England) 396:819–829

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. McMurray JJV, Packer M, Desai AS et al (2014) Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition versus enalapril in heart failure. N Engl J Med 371:993–1004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tromp J, Ouwerkerk W, van Veldhuisen DJ et al (2022) A Systematic review and network meta-analysis of pharmacological treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. JACC Heart Fail 10:73–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Heidenreich PA, Bozkurt B, Aguilar D et al (2022) 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American college of cardiology/american heart association joint committee on clinical practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 79:e263–e421

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M et al (2021) 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J 42:3599–3726

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rosano GMC, Moura B, Metra M et al (2021) Patient profiling in heart failure for tailoring medical therapy. A consensus document of the heart failure association of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur J Heart Fail. 23:872–881

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Anguita Sánchez M, Lambert Rodríguez JL, Bover Freire R et al (2016) Classification and quality standards of heart failure units: scientific consensus of the Spanish Society of Cardiology. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) 69:940–950

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V et al (2015) Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Hear J Cardiovasc Imaging 16:233–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP (2007) The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med 147:573–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. McMurray JJV, Packer M (2021) How should we sequence the treatments for heart failure and a reduced ejection fraction?: a redefinition of evidence-based medicine. Circulation 143:875–877

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Miller RJH, Howlett JG, Fine NM (2021) A novel approach to medical management of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Can J Cardiol 37:632–643

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Velazquez EJ, Morrow DA, DeVore AD et al (2019) Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition in acute decompensated heart failure. N Engl J Med 380:539–548

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kapelios CJ, Laroche C, Crespo-Leiro MG et al (2020) Association between loop diuretic dose changes and outcomes in chronic heart failure: observations from the ESC-EORP heart failure long-term registry. Eur J Heart Fail 22:1424–1437

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Beldhuis IE, Lam CSP, Testani JM et al (2022) Evidence-based medical therapy in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and chronic kidney disease. Circulation 145:693–712

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Anker SD, Butler J, Filippatos G et al (2021) Effect of empagliflozin on cardiovascular and renal outcomes in patients with heart failure by baseline diabetes status: results from the EMPEROR-reduced trial. Circulation 143:337–349

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Esteban-Fernández A, Ortiz Cortés C, López-Fernández S et al (2022) Experience with the potassium binder patiromer in hyperkalaemia management in heart failure patients in real life. ESC Hear Fail 9(5):3071–3078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kotecha D, Holmes J, Krum H et al (2014) Efficacy of β blockers in patients with heart failure plus atrial fibrillation: an individual-patient data meta-analysis. Lancet (London, England) 384:2235–2243

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Böhm M, Swedberg K, Komajda M et al (2010) Heart rate as a risk factor in chronic heart failure (SHIFT): the association between heart rate and outcomes in a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet (London, England) 376:886–894

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tymińska A, Ozierański K, Wawrzacz M et al (2022) Heart rate control and its predictors in patients with heart failure and sinus rhythm. Data from the European Society of Cardiology long-term registry. Cardiol J. https://doi.org/10.5603/CJ.a2022.0076

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Vardeny O, Claggett B, Kachadourian J et al (2018) Incidence, predictors, and outcomes associated with hypotensive episodes among heart failure patients receiving sacubitril/valsartan or enalapril: the PARADIGM-HF trial (prospective comparison of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor to determine impact on global mortality and morbidity in heart failure). Circ Heart Fail 11(4):e004745

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mebazaa A, Davison B, Chioncel O et al (2022) Safety, tolerability and efficacy of up-titration of guideline-directed medical therapies for acute heart failure (STRONG-HF): a multinational, open-label, randomised, trial. Lancet (London, England). 400(10367):1938–1952

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Oyanguren J, Garcia-Garrido L, Nebot-Margalef M et al (2021) Noninferiority of heart failure nurse titration versus heart failure cardiologist titration ETIFIC multicenter randomized trial. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) 74:533–543

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Crespo-Leiro MG, Segovia-Cubero J, González-Costello J et al (2015) Adherence to the ESC heart failure treatment guidelines in spain: ESC heart failure long-term registry. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) 68:785–793

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

List of contributors to the TIDY-HF registry: Xabier Arana-Achaga, Francisco José Bermúdez Jiménez, Marta Cobo Marcos, Concepción Cruzado Álvarez, Juan F. Delgado Jiménez, Víctor Donoso Trenado, Inmaculada Fernández Rozas, Aleix Fort, Belén García, María Dolores García-Cosío Carmena, Clara Jiménez Rubio, Laura Jordán Martínez, Bernardo Lanza Reynolds, Juan Carlos López-Azor, Raquel López Vilella, Ainara Lozano Bahamonde, Irene Marco Clement, Elisabet Mena Sabastia, María Molina Villar, Julio Nuñez Villota, Pedro Agustín Pájaro Merino, Alejandro Pérez Cabeza, Montserrat Puga Martínez, Ainhoa Robles Mezcua, Ester Sánchez Corral, Enrique Sánchez Muñoz, José María Segura Aumente, Estefanía Torrecilla and Iñaki Villanueva Benito.

Funding

This project was supported by a grant for Heart Failure Research projects from the Heart Failure Association of the Spanish Society of Cardiology (SECAINC-INV-ICC 21/003). An unconditional grant from Novartis and an unconditional grant from Boehringer-Ingelheim provided additional support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

Study design: AE-F, IGO. Data collection: all authors. Data review and statistical analysis: AE-F, IGO. Manuscript drafting: AE-F, IGO. Review, editing, and acceptance of the manuscript: all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alberto Esteban-Fernández.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

AE-F has received scientific speaking fees from Novartis, Bayer, Vifor, Fresenius, and Boehringer-Ingelheim. IGO has received funding or fees from Pfizer, Novartis, Rovi, Vifor, Orion, and Boheringer-Ingelheim. JJB reports consulting and speaking fees from Almirall, AstraZeneca, ArrhytNeT, Bayer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Daiichi Sankyo, Esteve, Impulse Dynamics, Orion Pharma, Novartis, Rovi, Servier, and Vifor. The other authors declare no conflict of interest with this article.

Additional information

The complete details of author involved in TIDY-HF investigators are given in acknowledgements.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Esteban-Fernández, A., Gómez-Otero, I., López-Fernández, S. et al. Influence of the medical treatment schedule in new diagnoses patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. Clin Res Cardiol (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-023-02241-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-023-02241-0

Keywords

Navigation